Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T03:53:07.066Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coin Identification and Relative Value: A Training Programme for Adults with Mental Handicap

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

Carmen Llorente  and
E. A. Gaffan
Carmen Llorente
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Reading
E. A. Gaffan
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Reading
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The five participants in this study were adult long-term residents of institutions for people with mental handicap who had only rudimentary numerical and monetary skills. All were successfully trained, using methods based on “errorless stimulus fading” techniques within a multiple-baseline experimental design, to recognize the seven British coin types and to judge their relative value. Recognition training incidentally resulted in ability to name the coins. Training at each skill required four to seven sessions of up to 20 minutes each, at intervals of 24 hours or more. Performance remained accurate at three-week and six-month follow-up. In four out of five subjects, improvement at recognition could be attributed specifically to the training sequence.

Type
Clinical Section
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , October 1989 , pp. 332 - 346
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barlow, D. H. and Hersen, M. (1984). Single-case Experimental Designs, 2nd edition, Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Bellamy, T. and Buttars, K. L. (1975). Teaching trainable level retarded students to count money: towards personal independence through academic instruction. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded 10, 18–26.Google Scholar
Borakove, L. S. and Cuvo, A. J. (1976). Facilitative effects of coin displacement on teaching coin summation to mentally retarded adolescents. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 81, 350–356.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cuvo, A. J. (1979). Multiple baseline design in instructional research: pitfalls of measurement and procedural advantages. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 84, 219–228.Google Scholar
Cuvo, A. J. and Riva, M. T. (1980). Generalization and transfer between comprehension and production: a comparison of retarded and nonretarded persons. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 13, 315–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cuvo, A. J, Veitch, V. D., Trace, M. W. and Konke, J. L. (1978). Teaching change computation to the mentally retarded. Behavior Modification 2, 531–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frank, A. R. and McFarland, T. D. (1980). Teaching coin skills to EMR children: a curriculum study. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded 15, 270–278.Google Scholar
Kazdin, A. E. and Kopel, S. A. (1975). On resolving ambiguities of the multiple-baseline design: problems and recommendations. Behavior Therapy 6, 601–608.Google Scholar
Lambert, J-L. (1980). Stimulus fading procedures and discrimination learning by retarded children. In Advances in Mental Handicap Research 1, Hogg, J. and Mittler, P. J. (Eds), Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lowe, M. L. and Cuvo, A. J. (1976). Teaching coin summation to the mentally retarded. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 9, 483–489.Google Scholar
McIvor, M. and McGinley, P. (1983). Teaching coin discrimination using an errorless learning procedure. Mental Handicap 11, 110–113.Google Scholar
Matson, J. L. and Long, S. (1986). Teaching computation/shopping skills to mentally retarded adults. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 91, 98–101.Google ScholarPubMed
Miller, M. A., Cuvo, A. J. and Borakove, L. S. (1977). Teaching naming of coin values: comprehension before production vs. production alone. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 10, 735–736.Google Scholar
Smeets, P. M. and Kleinloog, D. (1980). Teaching retarded women to use an experimental pocket calculator for making financial transactions. Behavior Research of Severe Developmental Disabilities 1, 1–20.Google Scholar
Terrace, H. S. (1966). Stimulus control. In Operant Behavior: Areas of Research and Application, Konig, W. K. (Ed.), New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Thyer, B. A. and Curtis, G. C. (1983). The repeated pretest-posttest single-subject experiment: a new design for empirical clinical practice. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry 14, 311–316.Google Scholar
Trace, M. W., Cuvo, A. J. and Criswell, J. L. (1977). Teaching coin equivalence to the mentally retarded. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 10, 85–92.Google Scholar
Vogelsberg, T. (1975). Project Telepac: Naming Coins, Logan: Utah State University.Google Scholar
Wheeler, J., Ford, A., Nietupski, J., Loomis, R. and Brown, L. (1980). Teaching moderately and severely handicapped adolescents to shop in supermarkets using pocket calculators. Education and Training of the Mentally Retarded 15, 105–112.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.