Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:50:23.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dealing with Feelings: The Effectiveness of Cognitive Behavioural Group Treatment for Women in Secure Settings

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 November 2010

Clive G. Long*
Affiliation:
St Andrew's Healthcare, and King's College London, St Andrew's Academic Centre, Northampton, UK
Barbara Fulton
Affiliation:
St Andrew's Healthcare, Northampton, UK
Olga Dolley
Affiliation:
St Andrew's Healthcare, Northampton, UK
Clive R. Hollin
Affiliation:
University of Leicester, UK
*
Reprint requests to Clive G. Long, St Andrew's Healthcare, Billing Road, Northampton NN1 5DG, UK. E-mail: clong@standrew.co.uk

Abstract

Background: Women in secure psychiatric settings have gender specific treatment needs. The current study examined the feasibility of a Dealing with Feelings Skills Group training for dual diagnosis women admitted to a medium secure setting. Method: A pre-test – post-test design was used to evaluate a group programme adapted from dialectical behaviour therapy skills training. Results: Most patients had a primary diagnosis of personality disorder. Treatment completers (n = 29) were compared with non-completers (n = 15). Clinically significant changes in treatment completers were apparent on coping response measures of positive reappraisal, problem solving and alternative rewards; on measures of anxiety and suicidality; on self-reported ability to engage in activities to reduce negative mood and to recognize mood changes. Self-harming and aggressive behaviours also reduced in the 3 months following group treatment. Conclusion: An adapted coping skills component of DBT benefit many dual diagnosis patients: issues related to treatment drop-out and failure to benefit are discussed.

Type
Brief Clinical Reports
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Jerusalem, M. and Schwarzer, R. (1992). Self-efficacy as a resource factor in stress appraisal process. In Schwarzer, R. (Ed.), Self-efficacy: thought control of action. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.Google Scholar
Linehan, M. (1993). The Cognitive Behavioural Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Long, C. G., Fulton, B. and Hollin, C. R. (2008). The development of a “Best Practise” service for women in a medium secure psychiatric setting: treatment components and evaluation. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 15, 304319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukoff, D., Nuechterlin, K. and Ventura, J. (1986). Manual for the expanded brief psychiatric rating scale. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 13, 261276.Google Scholar
McMurran, M. and McCulloch, A. (2007). Why don't offenders complete treatment? Prisoners’ reasons for non-completion of a cognitive skills programme. Psychology, Crime and Law, 13, 345354.Google Scholar
Patton, J. H., Stanford, N. S. and Barratt, E. S. (1995). Factor structure of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51, 768784.Google Scholar
Moos, I. H. (1990). Coping Responses Inventory Manual. Palo Alto: CA: Stanford University and Veterans Administration Medical Centres.Google Scholar
Oestrich, I. H., Austin, S. F. and Lykke, J. (2007). The feasibility of a cognitive behavioural intervention for low self-esteem with a dual diagnosis inpatient population. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 35, 403408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sambrook, S., Abba, N. and Chadwick, P. (2007). Evaluation of DBT emotional coping skills groups for people with para suicidal behaviours. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy, 35, 241244.Google Scholar
Yudofsky, S. C., Silver, J. M., Jackson, W., Endicott, J. and Williams, D. (1986). The Overt Aggression Scale for the objective rating of verbal and physical aggression. American Journal of Psychiatry, 143, 3539.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Long et al. supplementary material

Extended report

Download Long et al. supplementary material(File)
File 114.2 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.