Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:52:37.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

DIFFERENCES IN THE APPRAISAL OF INTRUSIVE THOUGHTS AND CONTAMINATION FEARS IN OBSESSIVE-COMPULSIVE DISORDER

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 April 2004

Christian Ryan
Affiliation:
Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, UK

Abstract

A number of studies have shown that patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder do not universally regard their obsessions as either senseless or unlikely to happen. This is of particular significance for the current cognitive-behavioural model of OCD, which is based on the notion that obsessions are ego-dystonic. This study examined the appraisal of obsessions by a group of OCD patients (n=63). Participants completed a paper and pencil task in which they had to appraise a range of intrusive thoughts and contamination fears on two variables: senselessness and likelihood to happen. The results suggest that the appraisals may vary according to the content of the obsessive thought. Contamination obsessions were judged less senseless and more likely to happen than obsessions concerning aggressive and sexual themes. A number of variables, which may play a role in these appraisals, are discussed and the methodological limitations of the study are examined.

Type
Brief Clinical Reports
Copyright
2004 British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Supplementary material: File

Ryan extended report

Ryan Supplementary material

Download Ryan extended report(File)
File 90.6 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.