Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:51:10.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Momentary and Partial Interval Time Sampling: A Reply to Harrop, Daniels and Foulkes (1990)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2009

Robert M. Adams
Robert M. Adams
Affiliation:
Eastern Kentucky University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Momentary time sampling (MTS) is described as an unbiased method of estimating time spent engaging in target behaviour. Conclusions that MTS with long sampling intervals or for short sessions results in large error are based on studies which use too few observations (a too-small sample size) to expect small sampling error. Partial interval (PI) sampling is a biased method, and the degree of bias changes as the characteristics of the behaviour change, a particular problem for intervention studies.

Type
Research Article
Information
Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , October 1991 , pp. 333 - 336
Copyright
Copyright © British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R. M. and Markley, R. P. (1978). Behavior sampling methods based on time: a review and an assessment of validity by computer simulation.Paper presented at the Animal Behavior Society meeting,July,Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
Brulle, A. P. and Repp, A. C. (1984). An investigation of the accuracy of momentary time sampling procedures with time series data. British Journal of Psychology 75, 481–485.Google Scholar
Dunbar, R. I. M. (1976). Some aspects of research design and their implications in the observational study of behavior. Behaviour 58, 79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, B. and Adams, R. M. (1983). A parametric model for estimating prevalence incidence, and mean bout duration from point sampling. American Journal of Primatology 4, 261–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harrop, A. and Daniels, M. (1985). Momentary time sampling with time series data: a commentary on the paper by Brulle and Repp. British Journal of Psychology 76, 533–537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrop, A., Daniels, M. and Foulkes, C. (1990). The use of momentary time sampling and partial interval recording in behavioural research. Behavioural Psychotherapy 18, 121–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraemer, H. C. (1979). One-zero sampling in the study of primate behaviour. Primates 20, 237–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leger, D. W. (1977). An empirical evaluation of instantaneous and one-zero sampling of chimpanzee behavior. Primates 18, 387–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudford, O. C., Beale, I. L. and Singh, N. N. (1990). The representativeness of observational samples of different durations. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis 23, 323–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, G. and Goodall, E. (1980). Measurement error in direct observation. Behaviour Research and Therapy 18, 147–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, J., Martindale, B., Kulp, S., Martindale, A. and Bauman, R. (1977). Taking a closer look: time-sampling and measurement error. Journal of Applied Behaviour Analysis 10, 325–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Powell, J. (1984a). Some empirical justification for a modest proposal regarding data acquisition via intermittent direct observation. Journal of Behavioral Assessment 6, 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, J. (1984b). On the misrepresentation of behavioral realities by a widely practised direct observation procedure: partial interval (one—zero) sampling. Behavioral Assessment 6, 209–219.Google Scholar
Tyler, S. (1979). Time-sampling: a matter of convenience. Animal Behaviour 27, 801–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rojahn, J. and Kanoy, R. C. (1985). Toward an empirically based parameter selection for time-sampling observation systems. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 7, 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.