Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T06:31:26.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In a bilingual state of mind: Investigating the continuous relationship between bilingual language experience and mentalizing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2021

Mehrgol Tiv Open the ORCID record for Mehrgol Tiv [Opens in a new window] ,
Elisabeth O’Regan  and
Debra Titone
Mehrgol Tiv*
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal, Canada
Elisabeth O’Regan
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal, Canada
Debra Titone*
Affiliation:
McGill University, Montréal, Canada
*
Address for correspondence: Mehrgol Tiv or Debra Titone, Ph.D. Department of Psychology, McGill University 2001 McGill College Ave. Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1G1, Canada Telephone: (514) 398-1778 / Fax: (514) 398-4896 E-mail: mehrgol.tiv@mail.mcgill.ca; debra.titone@mcgill.ca
Address for correspondence: Mehrgol Tiv or Debra Titone, Ph.D. Department of Psychology, McGill University 2001 McGill College Ave. Montreal, Quebec, H3A 1G1, Canada Telephone: (514) 398-1778 / Fax: (514) 398-4896 E-mail: mehrgol.tiv@mail.mcgill.ca; debra.titone@mcgill.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Mentalizing, a dynamic form of social cognition, is strengthened by language experience. Past research has found that bilingual children and adults outperform monolinguals on mentalizing tasks. However, bilingual experiences are multidimensional and diverse, and it is unclear how continuous individual differences in bilingual language experience relate to mentalizing. Here, we examine whether individual differences in bilingual language diversity, measured through language entropy, continuously pattern with mentalizing judgments among bilingual adults, and whether this relationship is constrained by first vs. second language reading. We tested sixty-one bilingual adults on a reading and inference task that compared mental state and logical inferences. We found that greater language diversity patterned with higher mentalizing judgments of mental state inferences across all readers, and that L2 readers attributed more mentalizing to logical inferences compared to L1 readers. Together, we found evidence of a positive relationship between continuous individual differences in bilingual language diversity and mentalizing.

Keywords

mentalizingbilingualisminferencestheory of mindsocial cognitionpragmaticslanguage diversity
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 24 , Issue 5 , November 2021 , pp. 918 - 931
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

All anonymized materials are available on the Open Science Framework: https://osf.io/m2h93/

References

Antoniou, K (2019) Multilingual pragmatics: Implicature comprehension in adult L2 learners and multilingual children. In Taguchi, N (ed), The Routledge Handbook of Pragmatics and Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge, pp. 495–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antoniou, K and Katsos, N (2017) The effect of childhood multilingualism and bilectalism on implicature understanding. Applied Psycholinguistics 38, 787–833. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271641600045XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Apperly, IA (2008) Beyond Simulation-Theory and Theory-Theory: Why social cognitive neuroscience should use its own concepts to study “theory of mind.” Cognition 107, 266–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.07.019CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Astington, JW and Gopnik, A (1988) Knowing you've changed your mind: Children's understanding of representational change. In Astington, JW, Harris, P and Olson, D (eds), Developing theories of mind. Cambridge University Press, pp. 193–206.Google Scholar
Baimel, A, Birch, SA and Norenzayan, A (2018) Coordinating bodies and minds: Behavioral synchrony fosters mentalizing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 74, 281–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2017.10.008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banasik, N (2013) Non-literal speech comprehension in preschool children - an example from a study on verbal irony. Psychology of Language and Communication 17, 309–323. https://doi.org/10.2478/plc-2013-0020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baron-Cohen, S, Leslie, AM and Frith, U (1985) Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”?. Cognition 21(1), 37–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90022-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron-Cohen, S, Wheelwright, S, Hill, J, Raste, Y and Plumb, I (2001) The “reading the mind in the eyes” test revised version: a study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology Psychiatry 42, 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021963001006643CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron-Cohen, S and Wheelwright, S (2004) The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 34, 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JADD.0000022607.19833.00CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barr, DJ, Levy, R, Scheepers, C and Tily, HJ (2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of memory and language 68, 255–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bateman, A and Fonagy, P (2019) Mentalization-based treatment for borderline and antisocial personality disorder. In Kealy, D and Ogrodniczuk, JS (eds), Contemporary Psychodynamic Psychotherapy: Evolving Clinical Practice. Academic Press, pp 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D, Maechler, M, Bolker, B and Walker, S (2014) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.1–7.Google Scholar
Baum, S and Titone, D (2014) Moving toward a neuroplasticity view of bilingualism, executive control, and aging. Applied Psycholinguistics 35, 857–894. doi:10.1017/s0142716414000174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bice, K and Kroll, JF (2019) English only? Monolinguals in linguistically diverse contexts have an edge in language learning. Brain and Language 196, 104644. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2019.104644CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloom, P and German, TP (2000) Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind. Cognition 77, 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00096-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burns, EJ, Tree, J, Chan, AH and Xu, H (2019) Bilingualism shapes the other race effect. Vision Research 157, 192–201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conway, JR, Coll, MP, Cuve, HC, Koletsi, S, Bronitt, N, Catmur, C and Bird, G (2019) Understanding how minds vary relates to skill in inferring mental states, personality, and intelligence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 149, 1032–1047. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000704CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, MH (1980) A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology 10, 85Google Scholar
De Bruin, A (2019) Not all bilinguals are the same: A call for more detailed assessments and descriptions of bilingual experiences. Behavioral Sciences 9, 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs9030033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Decety, J and Sommerville, JA (2003) Shared representations between self and other: A social cognitive neuroscience view. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7, 527–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.10.004CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dewaele, JM and Wei, L (2012) Multilingualism, empathy and multicompetence. International Journal of Multilingualism 9, 352–366. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2012.714380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewaele, JM and Li, W (2013) Is multilingualism linked to a higher tolerance of ambiguity?. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16, 231–240. doi:10.1017/S1366728912000570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumontheil, I, Apperly, IA and Blakemore, SJ (2010) Online usage of theory of mind continues to develop in late adolescence. Developmental Science 13, 331–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00888.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dziobek, I, Rogers, K, Fleck, S, Bahnemann, M, Heekeren, HR, Wolf, OT and Convit, A (2008) Dissociation of cognitive and emotional empathy in adults with Asperger syndrome using the Multifaceted Empathy Test (MET). Journal of Autism Developmental Disorders 38, 464–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fan, SP, Liberman, Z, Keysar, B and Kinzler, KD (2015) The Exposure Advantage: Early Exposure to a Multilingual Environment Promotes Effective Communication. Psychological Science 26, 1090–1097. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615574699CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, HJ, Apperly, I, Ahmad, J, Bindemann, M and Cane, J (2015) Task constraints distinguish perspective inferences from perspective use during discourse interpretation in a false belief task. Cognition 139, 50–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.02.010CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferstl, EC and Von Cramon, DY (2002) What does the frontomedian cortex contribute to language processing: Coherence or theory of mind? NeuroImage 17, 1599–1612. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2002.1247CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Filippova, E and Astington, JW (2010) Children's understanding of social-cognitive and social-communicative aspects of Discourse Irony. Child Development 81, 913–928. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01442.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fletcher, P, Happé, F, Frith, U, Baker, SC, Dolan, RJ, Frackowiak, RSJ, and Frith, CD (1995) Other minds in the brain: A functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension. Cognition 57, 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucart, A, Garcia, X, Ayguasanosa, M, Thierry, G, Martin, C and Costa, A (2015) Does the speaker matter? Online processing of semantic and pragmatic information in L2 speech comprehension. Neuropsychologia 75, 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2016.10.003CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Foucart, A, Romero-Rivas, C, Lottie, B and Costa, A (2016) Brain & Language Discourse comprehension in L2 : Making sense of what is not explicitly said. Brain and Language 163, 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.09.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frith, CD and Frith, U (1999) Interacting minds--a biological basis. Science 286, 1692–1695. 10.1126/science.286.5445.1692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaudreau, G, Monetta, L, Macoir, J, Poulin, S, Laforce, RJ and Hudon, C (2015) Mental State Inferences Abilities Contribution to Verbal Irony Comprehension in Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment. Behavioural Neurology, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/685613CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goetz, PJ (2003) The effects of bilingualism on theory of mind development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 6, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728903001007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graesser, AC, Singer, M and Trabasso, T (1994) Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological review 101, 371. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.101.3.371CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grosjean, J (2010) Attitudes and Feelings about Bilingualism. In Grosjean, J (ed), Bilingual: Life and Reality. Harvard University Press, pp 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gullberg, M (1998) Gesture as a communication strategy in second language discourse: A study of learners of French and Swedish (Vol. 35). Lund University.Google Scholar
Gullifer, JW and Titone, D (2018) Compute language entropy with {languageEntropy}. Retrieved from https://github.com/jasongullifer/languageEntropy. doi:10.5281/zenodo.1406201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gullifer, JW and Titone, D (2019) Characterizing the social diversity of bilingualism using language entropy. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition : 23, 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gullifer, JW and Titone, D (2020) Engaging proactive control: Influences of diverse language experiences using insights from machine learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000933Google ScholarPubMed
Harris, LT (2017) Invisible mind: flexible social cognition and dehumanization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. doi: 10.7551/mitpress/9780262035965.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, RJ and Monaco, GE (1978) Psychology of pragmatic implication: Information processing between the lines. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 107, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.107.1.1Google Scholar
Higgins, ET (1981) Role taking and social judgment: Alternative developmental perspectives and processes. In Flavell, R and Parke, R (eds), Social Cognitive Development: Frontiers and Possible Futures. Cambridge University Press, pp 119–153.Google Scholar
Horiba, Y (1996) Comprehension Processes in L2 Reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 18, 433–473. https://doi.org/10.1177/01454829909300906CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsin, L and Snow, C (2017) Social perspective taking: A benefit of bilingualism in academic writing. Reading and Writing 30, 1193–1214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-016-9718-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikizer, EG and Ramírez-Esparza, N (2018) Bilinguals’ social flexibility. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 21, 957–969. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728917000414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J and Rosano, T (1993) Relation of cognitive style to metaphor interpretation and second language proficiency. Applied psycholinguistics 14, 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271640000953XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson-Laird, PN (1993) The mental representation of the meaning of words. In Goldman, AI (ed), Readings in Philosophy and Cognitive Science. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jolliffe, D and Farrington, DP (2006) Development and validation of the Basic Empathy Scale. Journal of Adolescence 29, 589–611. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.08.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kanske, P, Böckler, A, Trautwein, FM, Parianen Lesemann, FH and Singer, T (2016) Are strong empathizers better mentalizers? Evidence for independence and interaction between the routes of social cognition. Social Cognitive and Affective neuroscience 11, 1383–1392. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsw052CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kidd, DC and Castano, E (2013) Reading literary fiction improves theory of mind. Science 342, 377–380. doi: 10.1126/science.1239918CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kispal, A (2008) Effective teaching of inference skills for reading. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED501868.pdfGoogle Scholar
Kovács, Á. M. (2009) Early bilingualism enhances mechanisms of false-belief reasoning. Developmental Science 12, 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00742.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavoie, MA, Vistoli, D, Sutliff, S, Jackson, PL and Achim, AM (2016) Social representations and contextual adjustments as two distinct components of the Theory of Mind brain network: evidence from the REMICS task. Cortex 81, 176–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2016.04.017CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matuschek, H, Kliegl, R, Vasishth, S, Baayen, H and Bates, D (2017) Balancing Type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language 94, 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mepham, KD and Martinovic, B (2018) Multilingualism and out-group acceptance: The mediating roles of cognitive flexibility and deprovincialization. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 37, 51–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X17706944CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milligan, K, Astington, JW and Dack, LA (2007) The Language Demographics of Amazon Mechanical Turk. Child Development 78, 622–646. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, JP (2009) Social psychology as a natural kind. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 13, 246–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2009.03.008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Myers, JL, Shinjo, M and Duffy, SA (1987) Degree of causal relatedness and memory. Journal of Memory and Language 26, 453–465. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(87)90101-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadig, A and Ozonoff, S (2007) Bridging inferences in high-functioning autism: A reading time study comparing mental and physical inferences. Poster presented at the 32nd Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston, MA, USA.Google Scholar
Navarro, E and Conway, ARA (2020) Adult Bilinguals Outperform Monolinguals in Theory of Mind. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/nyt3wCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ortega, L (2018) Ontologies of language, Second Language Acquisition, and world Englishes. World Englishes 37, 64–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/weng.12303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pino, MC and Mazza, M (2016) The use of “literary fiction” to promote mentalizing ability. PloS One 11, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0160254CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poynor, DV and Morris, RK (2003) Inferred goals in narratives: Evidence from self-paced reading, recall, and eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 29, 3. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.1.3Google ScholarPubMed
Premack, D and Woodruff, G (1978) Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1, 515–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2011.1011.1001.7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyers, JE and Senghas, A (2009) Language Promotes False-Belief Understanding: Evidence from Learners of a New Sign Language. Psychological Science 20, 805–812. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02377.x.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rai, MK, Loschky, LC, Harris, RJ, Peck, NR and Cook, LG (2011) Effects of stress and working memory capacity on foreign language readers’ inferential processing during comprehension. Language Learning 61, 187–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00592.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramírez-Esparza, N, García-Sierra, A and Jiang, S (2020) The current standing of bilingualism in today's globalized world: A socio-ecological perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology 32, 124–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.06.038CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubio-Fernández, P and Glucksberg, S (2012) Reasoning about other people's beliefs: Bilinguals have an advantage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 38, 211–217. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025162Google ScholarPubMed
Rutherford, HJ, Wareham, JD, Vrouva, I, Mayes, LC, Fonagy, P and Potenza, MN (2012) Sex differences moderate the relationship between adolescent language and mentalization. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment 3, 393. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028938CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarfati, Y, Hardy-Baylé, MC, Besche, C and Widlöcher, D (1997) Attribution of intentions to others in people with schizophrenia: a non-verbal exploration with comic strips. Schizophrenia Research. 25, 199–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Saxe, R and Kanwisher, N (2003) People thinking about thinking people: the role of the temporo-parietal junction in “theory of mind”. Neuroimage 19, 1835–1842. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00230-1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schroeder, SR (2018) Do Bilinguals Have an Advantage in Theory of Mind? A Meta-Analysis. Frontiers in Communication 3, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2018.00036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, L, Quinn, PC, Qian, M and Lee, K (2020) Bilingualism is associated with less racial bias in preschool children. Developmental Psychology 56, 888–896. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000905CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slaughter, V and Repacholi, B (2003) Individual differences in theory of mind: What are we investigating?. Individual differences in theory of mind: Implications for typical and atypical development, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203488508Google Scholar
Snow, C (2002) Reading for Understanding: Toward an R&D Program in Reading Comprehension. The RAND Corporation. Retrieved from https://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1465.htmlGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D and Wilson, D (2002) Pragmatics, modularity and mind-reading. Mind & Language 17, 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0017.00186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundaray, S, Marinis, T and Bose, A (2018) Comprehending non-literal language: effects of aging and bilingualism. Frontiers in Psychology 9, 2230. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02230CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tamir, DI and Mitchell, JP (2010) Neural correlates of anchoring-and-adjustment during mentalizing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107, 10827–10832. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1003242107CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tiv, M, Kutlu, E and Titone, D (2021) Bilingualism Moves us Beyond the Ideal Speaker Narrative in Cognitive Psychology. In Francis, W.S. (Ed.). Bilingualism Across the Lifespan: Opportunities and Challenges for Cognitive Research in a Global Society (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315143996CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiv, M, Deodato, F, Rouillard, V, Wiebe, S and Titone, D (2020) Second language experience impacts first language irony comprehension among bilingual adults. PsyArxiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/3wu9rCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiv, M, Gonnerman, L, Whitford, V, Friesen, D, Jared, D and Titone, D (2019a) Figuring out how verb-particle constructions are understood during L1 and L2 reading. Frontiers in psychology 10, 1733. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01733CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tiv, M, Rouillard, V, Vingron, N, Wiebe, S and Titone, D (2019b) Global Second Language Proficiency Predicts Self-Perceptions of General Sarcasm Use Among Bilingual Adults. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 38, 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X19865764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, AR, Hanko, K, Galinsky, AD and Mussweiler, T (2011) When focusing on differences leads to similar perspectives. Psychological Science 22, 134–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610392929CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Todd, AR, Simpson, AJ and Tamir, DI (2016) Active perspective taking induces flexible use of self-knowledge during social inference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 145, 1583–1588. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000237CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vaid, J and Meuter, R (2016) Not through a glass darkly: Refocusing the psycholinguistic study of bilingualism through a ‘bivocal'lens. In Cook, V and Wei, L (eds.), The Cambridge handbook of linguistic multi-competence. Cambridge University Press, pp 77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaid, J and Meuter, RF (2017) Languages without borders. In Libben, M, Goral, M and Libben, G (eds), Bilingualism: A Framework for Understanding the Mental Lexicon. John Benjamins, pp 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valle, A, Massaro, D, Castelli, I, Sangiuliano Intra, F, Lombardi, E, Bracaglia, E and Marchetti, A (2016) Promoting mentalizing in pupils by acting on teachers: Preliminary Italian evidence of the “Thought in Mind” Project. Frontiers in Psychology 7, 1213. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Overwalle, F (2011) A dissociation between social mentalizing and general reasoning. Neuroimage 54, 1589–1599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.043CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verhagen, J, Grassmann, S and Küntay, AC (2017) Monolingual and bilingual children's resolution of referential conflicts: Effects of bilingualism and relative language proficiency. Cognitive Development 41, 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogdev.2016.10.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warnell, KR and Redcay, E (2019) Minimal coherence among varied theory of mind measures in childhood and adulthood. Cognition 191, 103997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.06.009CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zwaan, RA and Brown, CM (1996) The influence of language proficiency and comprehension skill on situation-model construction. Discourse Processes 21, 289–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539609544960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Tiv et al. supplementary material

Tiv et al. supplementary material

Download Tiv et al. supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 161.3 KB