Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T13:22:40.223Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Morphological decomposition in native and non-native French speakers*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 September 2014

CAITLIN E. COUGHLIN  and
ANNIE TREMBLAY
CAITLIN E. COUGHLIN*
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
ANNIE TREMBLAY
Affiliation:
University of Kansas
*
Address for correspondence: Caitlin Coughlin, Department of Linguistics, University of Kansas, 1541 Lilac Lane, Blake Hall Room 427, Lawrence, KS 66047, USAc.coughlin@ku.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study investigates whether late second/foreign language (L2) learners can rely on mechanisms similar to those of native speakers for processing morphologically complex words. Specifically, it examines whether native English speakers who have begun learning French around the onset of puberty can decompose -er (Class I) French verbs. Mid-to-high-proficiency L2 learners and native French speakers completed a masked-priming word-naming task. Latencies for morphologically related, orthographically related, and semantically related prime–target combinations were compared to latencies for identical and unrelated prime–target combinations. The results reveal the following effects: full morphological priming for both native and non-native speakers, with this effect increasing with French proficiency for L2 learners; partial orthographic priming for both groups; greater priming in the morphological condition than in the orthographic condition for both groups; and no semantic priming for either group. We conclude that L2 learners have access to similar mechanisms to those of native speakers for processing morphologically complex words.

Keywords

morphological processingmorphological decompositionmasked-priming word namingFrench
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , July 2015 , pp. 524 - 542
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

For their insightful comments on this research, we are very grateful to: Drs Robert Fiorentino, Alison Gabriele and Stephen Politzer-Ahles; the members of the Research in Acquisition and Processing group at the University of Kansas; and Dr Robert DeKeyser and three anonymous reviewers. Any misunderstandings are, of course, our own.

References

Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2009). Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny. Language Learning, 59, 249–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alegre, M., & Gordon, P. (1999). Frequency effects and the representational status of regular inflections. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 41–61.Google Scholar
Amon, E., Muyskens, J., & Omaggio Hadley, A. (2010). Vis-à-vis: Beginning French (5th edn.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (1993). Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R., & Fincham, J. M. (1994). Acquisition of procedural skills from examples. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1322–1340.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data: A practical introduction to statistics using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Dijkstra, T., & Schreuder, R. (1997). Singulars and plurals in Dutch: Evidence for a parallel dual-route model. Journal of Memory and Language, 37, 94–117.Google Scholar
Baayen, R. H., Wurm, L. H., & Aycock, J. (2007). Lexical dynamics for low-frequency complex words. The Mental Lexicon, 2, 419–463.Google Scholar
Babcock, L., Stowe, J. C., Maloof, C. J., Brovetto, C., & Ullman, M. T. (2012). The storage and composition of inflected forms in adult-learned second language: A study of the influence of length of residence, age of arrival, sex, and other factors. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 15, 820–840.Google Scholar
Basnight-Brown, D. M., Chen, L., Hua, S., Kostic, A., & Feldman, L. B. (2007). Monolingual and bilingual recognition of regular and irregular English verbs: Sensitivity to form similarity varies with first language experience. Journal of Memory and Language, 57, 65–80.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., & Miller, B. (1999). The problem of age in second language acquisition: Influences from language, structure, and task. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 2, 127–145.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. (2006). Age and second language acquisition and processing: A selective overview. Language Learning, 56, 1–49.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D., & Molis, M. (2001). On the evidence for maturational constraints in second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 235–249.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2007). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 5.2.11) [Computer program]. Available at www.praat.org.Google Scholar
Bowden, H., Gelfand, M., Sanz, C., & Ullman, M. T. (2010). Verbal inflectional morphology in L1 and L2 Spanish: A frequency effects study examining storage versus composition. Language Learning, 60, 44–87.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clahsen, H. (1999). Lexical entries and rules of language: A multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 991–1060.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H. (2006). Dual-mechanism morphology. In Brown, K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (vol. 4), pp. 1–5. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Balkhair, L., Shutter, J.-S., & Cunnings, I. (2013). The time course of morphological processing in a second language. Second Language Research, 29, 7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clahsen, H., Eisenbeiss, S., & Sonnenstuhl, I. (1997). Morphological structure and the processing of inflected words. Theoretical Linguistics, 23, 201–249.Google Scholar
Clahsen, H., Felser, C., Neubauer, K., Sato, M., & Silva, R. (2010). Morphological structure in native and nonnative language processing. Language Learning, 60, 21–43.Google Scholar
Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., Coltheart, M., & Nickels, L. (2010). Fell primes fall, but does belle prime ball? Masked priming with irregularly inflected primes. Journal of Memory and Language, 63, 83–99.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 195–221.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499–533.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M. (2007). Skill acquisition theory. In VanPatten, B. & Williams, J. (eds.), Theories in second language acquisition, pp. 97–113. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. M., Alfi-Shabtay, I., & Ravid, D. (2010). Cross-linguistic evidence for the nature of age effects in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 413–438.Google Scholar
Diependaele, K., Duñabeitia, J. A., Morris, J., & Keuleers, E. (2011). Fast morphological effects in first and second language word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 64, 344–358.Google Scholar
Embick, D., & Marantz, A. (2005). Cognitive neuroscience and the English past tense: Comments on the paper by Ullman et al. Brain and Language, 93, 243–247.Google Scholar
Feldman, L. B., Kostic, A., Basnight-Brown, D. M., Durdevic, D. F., & Pastizzo, M. J. (2010). Morphological facilitation for regular and irregular verb formations in native and non-native speakers: Little evidence for two distinct mechanisms. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 119–135.Google Scholar
Frenck-Mestre, C., Osterhout, L., McLaughlin, J., & Foucart, A. (2008). The effect of phonological realization of inflectional morphology on verbal agreement in French: Evidence from ERPs. Acta Psychologica, 128, 528–536.Google Scholar
Gabriele, A., Fiorentino, R., & Aleman-Bañón, J. (2013). Examining second language development using event-related potentials: A cross-sectional study on the processing of gender and number agreement. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 3, 213–232.Google Scholar
Gillon-Dowens, M., Vergara, M., Barber, H. A., & Carreiras, M. (2010). Morphosyntactic processing in late second-language learners. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22, 1870–1887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gor, K., & Cook, S. (2010). Nonnative processing of verbal morphology: In search of regularity. Language Learning, 60, 88–126.Google Scholar
Gor, K., & Jackson, S. (2013). Morphological decomposition and lexical access in a native and second language: A nesting doll effect. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28, 1065–1091.Google Scholar
Grainger, J., & Ferrand, L. (1996). Masked orthographic and phonological priming in visual word recognition and naming: Crosstasks comparisons. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 623–647.Google Scholar
Hahne, A., Muller, J., & Clahsen, H. (2006). Morphological processing in a second language: Behavioral and ERP evidence for storage and decomposition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18, 121–134.Google Scholar
Hakuta, K., Bialystok, E., & Wiley, E. (2003). Critical evidence: A test of the critical-period hypothesis for second-language acquisition. Psychological Science, 14, 31–38.Google Scholar
Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection: The view from Building 20. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jacob, G., Fleischhauer, E., & Clahsen, H. (2013). Allomorphy and affixation in morphological processing: A cross-modal priming study with late bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 16, 924–933.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehtonen, M., Niska, H., Wande, E., Niemi, J., & Laine, M. (2006). Recognition of inflected words in morphologically limited language: Frequency effects in monolinguals and bilinguals. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35, 121–146.Google Scholar
Marslen-Wilson, W., & Tyler, L. (1998). Rules, representations, and the English past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 428–435.Google Scholar
McClelland, J., & Patterson, K. (2002). Rules or connections in past-tense inflections: What does the evidence rule out? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 465–472.Google Scholar
McCormick, S. F., Rastle, K., & Davis, M. H. (2009). Adore-able not adorable? Orthographic underspecification studied with masked repetition priming. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21, 813–836.Google Scholar
McDonald, J. L. (2006). Beyond the critical period: Processing-based explanations for poor grammaticality judgment performance by late second language learners. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 381–401.Google Scholar
Meunier, F., & Marslen-Wilson, W. (2004). Regularity and irregularity in French verbal inflection. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19, 561–580.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C. (2008). Symmetries and asymmetries of age effects in naturalistic and instructed L2 learning. Applied Linguistics, 29, 578–596.Google Scholar
Neubauer, K., & Clahsen, H. (2009). Decomposition of inflected words in a second language: An experimental study of German participles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31, 403–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New, B., Pallier, C., Ferrand, L., & Matos, R. (2001). Une base de données lexicales du français contemporain sur internet: LEXIQUE. L’Année Psychologique, 101, 447–462.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (1994). Neurolinguistic aspects of implicit and explicit memory: Implications for bilingualism and SLA. In Ellis, N. (ed.), Implicit and explicit language learning, pp. 393–419. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (2004). A neurolinguistic theory of bilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pinker, S., & Ullman, M. T. (2002). The past and future of the past tense. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 456–463.Google Scholar
Portin, M., Lehtonen, M., & Laine, M. (2007). Processing of inflected nouns in late bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 135–156.Google Scholar
Portin, M., Lehtonen, M., Herrer, G., Wande, E., Niemi, J., & Laine, M. (2008). L1 effects on the processing of inflected nouns in L2. Acta Psychologica, 128, 452–465.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., & New, B. (2004). The broth in my brother's brothel: Morpho-orthographic segmentation in visual word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 1090–1098.Google Scholar
Rastle, K., Davis, M. H., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). Morphological and semantic effects in visual word recognition: A time-course study. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 507–537.Google Scholar
Royle, P., Drury, J. E., Bourguignon, N., & Steinhauer, K. (2012). The temporal dynamics of inflected word recognition: A masked ERP priming study of French verbs. Neuropsychologia, 50, 3542–3553.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D., & McClelland, J. (1986). On learning the past tense of English verbs: Implicit rules or parallel distributed processing? In McClelland, J., Rumelhart, D. & the Group, PDP Research (eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, pp. 318–362. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user's guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.Google Scholar
Silva, R., & Clahsen, H. (2008). Morphologically complex words in L1 and L2 processing: Evidence from masked priming experiments in English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 11, 245–260.Google Scholar
Tanner, D., Inoue, K., & Osterhout, L., Brain-based individual differences in on-line L2 grammatical comprehension. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, doi:10.1017/S1366728913000370. Published online by Cambridge University Press, August 12, 2013.Google Scholar
Tremblay, A. (2011). Proficiency assessment in second language acquisition research: “Clozing” the gap. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 339–372.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T. (1999). Acceptability ratings of regular and irregular past tense forms: Evidence for a dual-system model of language from word frequency and phonological neighbourhood effects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 14, 47–67.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T. (2001). The declarative/procedural model of lexicon and grammar. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 37–69.Google Scholar
Ullman, M. T. (2005). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In Sanz, C. (ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory and practice, pp. 141–178. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Coughlin and Tremblay Supplementary Material

Supplementary Material

Download Coughlin and Tremblay Supplementary Material(PDF)
PDF 152.9 KB