Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T08:39:48.172Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing the role of current and cumulative exposure in simultaneous bilingual acquisition: The case of Dutch gender*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 September 2012

SHARON UNSWORTH
SHARON UNSWORTH*
Affiliation:
Utrecht University
*
Address for correspondence: Department of Modern Languages/Utrecht Institute of Linguistics, Trans 10, 3512JK Utrecht, The Netherlandss.unsworth@uu.nl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper investigates the role of amount of current and cumulative exposure in bilingual development and ultimate attainment by exploring the extent to which simultaneous bilingual children's knowledge of grammatical gender is affected by current and previous amount of exposure, including in the early years. Elicited production and grammaticality judgement data collected from 136 English–Dutch-speaking bilingual children aged between three and 17 years are used to examine the lexical and grammatical aspects of Dutch gender, viz. definite determiners and adjectival inflection. It is argued that the results are more consistent with a rule-based than a piecemeal approach to acquisition (Blom, Polišenskà & Weerman, 2008a; Gathercole & Thomas, 2005, 2009), and that non-target performance on the production task can be explained by the Missing Surface Inflection Hypothesis (Haznedar & Schwartz, 1997; Prévost & White, 2000; Weerman, Duijnmeijer & Orgassa, 2011).

Keywords

simultaneous bilingual acquisitionexposure effectsDutchgrammatical gendercumulative length of exposure
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , January 2013 , pp. 86 - 110
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This research was supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research with a VENI Innovational Research Incentives Scheme award to the author and an international programme award to Leonie Cornips. I wish to thank the participants and research assistants, as well as Leonie Cornips, Aafke Hulk, Antonella Sorace and Ianthi Tsimpli for discussion of some of the issues in this paper, Enlli Môn Thomas for comments on an earlier version of this paper, and Harvard Language and Cognition group for feedback on a presentation version. I also thank three anonymous reviewers for their critical and constructive comments.

References

Bianchi, G. (in press). Gender in Italian–German bilinguals: A comparison with German L2 learners of Italian. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, doi:10.1017/S1366728911000745. Published by Cambridge University Press, February 10, 2012.Google Scholar
Blom, E. (2010). Effects of input on the early grammatical development of bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism, 14, 422–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom, E., Polišenskà, D., & Weerman, F. (2008a). Articles, adjectives and age of onset: The acquisition of Dutch grammatical gender. Second Language Research, 24, 297–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom, E., Polišenskà, D., & Unsworth, S. (2008b). The acquisition of grammatical gender in Dutch. Second Language Research, 24, 259–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blom, E., & Vasic, N. (2011). The production and processing of determiner–noun agreement in child L2 Dutch. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 265–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, S., Cornips, L., & Hulk, A. (2008). Misrepresentation of Dutch neuter gender in older bilingual children? In Gavruseva, E. & Haznedar, B. (eds.), Trends in child second language acquisition, pp. 83–96. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruhn de Garavito, J., & White, L. (2002). The second language acquisition of Spanish DPs: The status of grammatical features. In Pérez-Leroux, A. T. & Munoz Liveras, J. (eds.), The acquisition of Spanish morphosyntax, pp. 153–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carroll, S. E. (1989). Second-language acquisition and the computational paradigm. Language Learning, 39, 535–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carstens, V. (2000). Concord in minimalist theory. Linguistic Inquiry, 31, 319–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chondrogianni, V., & Marinis, T. (2011). Differential effects of internal and external factors on the development of vocabulary, tense morphology and morpho-syntax in successive bilingual children. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 318–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornips, L., & Hulk, A. (2006). External and internal factors in bilingual and bidialectal language development: Grammatical gender of the Dutch definite determiner. In Lefebvre, C., White, L. & Jourdan, C. (eds.), L2 acquisition and creole genesis: Dialogues, pp. 355–378. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornips, L., & Hulk, A. (2008). Factors of success and failure in the acquisition of grammatical gender in Dutch. Second Language Research, 28, 267–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornips, L., van der Hoek, M., & Verwer, R. (2006). The acquisition of grammatical gender in bilingual child acquisition of Dutch (by older Moroccan and Turkish children): The definite determiner, attributive adjective and relative pronoun. In Los, B. & van de Weijer, J. (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 2006, pp. 40–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Damhuis, R., de Glopper, K., Boers, M., & Kienstra, M. (1992). Woordenlijst voor 4- tot 6-jarigen. Een streeflijst voor kleuters. Rotterdam: Projectbureau OVB.Google Scholar
De Houwer, A. (1990). The acquisition of two languages from birth: A case study. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Houwer, A. (2009). Bilingual first language acquisition. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, W., & Wijnen, F. (1985). The article's noun and the noun's article: Explorations into the representation and access of linguistic gender in Dutch. Linguistics, 23, 793–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, B. C. (1987). Dutch reference grammar. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test (PPVT-4) (4th edn.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., & Schlichting, L. (2005). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test-III-NL. Amsterdam: Pearson.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Burley, J. (1997). The British Picture Vocabulary Scale. London: GL Assessment.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. (2006). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gathercole, V. C. M. (2002a). Grammatical gender in bilingual and monolingual children: A Spanish morphosyntactic distinction. In Oller & Eilers (eds.), pp. 207–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, V. C. M. (2002b). Command of the mass/count distinction in bilingual and monolingual children: An English morphosyntactic distinction. In Oller & Eilers (eds.), pp. 175–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, V. C. M. (2002c). Monolingual and bilingual acquisition: Learning different treatments of that-trace phenomena in English and Spanish. In Oller, & Eilers, (eds.), pp. 220–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gathercole, V. C. M., & Thomas, E. M. (2005). Minority language survival: Input factors influencing the acquisition of welsh. In Cohen, J., McAlister, K., Rolstad, K. & MacSwan, J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Bilingualism, pp. 852–874. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Gathercole, V. C. M., & Thomas, E. M. (2009). Bilingual first-language development: Dominant language takeover, threatened minority language take-up. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 12, 213–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geerts, G., Haeseryn, W., Rooij, J. de, & Toorn, M. C. van de (1984). Algemene Nederlandse spraakkunst. Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff.Google Scholar
Genesee, F., & Nicoladis, E. (2007). Bilingual first language acquisition. In Hoff, E. & McCardle, P. (eds.), Handbook of language development, pp. 324–342. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gilger, J. W. (1992). Using self-report and parental-report survey data to assess past and present academic achievement of adults and children. Journal of Applied Development Psychology, 13, 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grüter, T., Lew-Williams, C., & Fernald, A. (2012). Grammatical gender in L2: A production or a real-time processing problem? Second Language Research, 28, 217–241.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutiérrez-Clellen, V. F., & Kreiter, J. (2003). Understanding child bilingual acquisition using parent and teacher reports. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 267–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, M. (1997). Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In Bruening, B., Kang, Y. & McGinnis, M. (eds.), Papers at the interface (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 30), pp. 425–449. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, M., & Marantz, A. (1993). Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Hale, K. & Keyser, S. J. (eds.), The view from Building 20, pp. 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Haznedar, B., & Schwartz, B. D. (1997). Are there optional infinitives in child L2 acquisition? In Hughes, E., Hughes, M. & Greenhill, A. (eds.), Proceedings of the 21st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp. 257–268. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Jia, G., & Aaronson, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of Chinese children and adolescents leaning English in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 131–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiparsky, P. (1973). “Elsewhere” in phonology. In Anderson, S. & Kiparsky, P. (eds.), A Festschrift for Morris Halle, pp. 93–106. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Kupisch, T., Müller, N., & Cantone, K. F. (2002). Gender in monolingual and bilingual first language acquisition. Lingue e Linguaggio, 1, 107–150.Google Scholar
Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarthy, C. (2008). Morphological variability in the comprehension of agreement: An argument for representation over computation. Second Language Research, 24, 459–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (2007a). On autonomous syntactic development in multiple first language acquisition. In Caunt-Nulton, H., Kulatilake, S. & Woo, I. (eds.), Proceedings of the 31st Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, pp. 26–45. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (2007b). Exploring the limits of the LAD. Working Papers in Multilingualism, 80, 3–31.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (2009). Second language acquisition in early childhood. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 28, 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montrul, S. A., Foote, R., & Perpiñán, S. (2008). Gender agreement in adult second language learners and Spanish heritage speakers: The effects of age and context of acquisition.Language Learning, 58, 503–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oller, D. K., & Eilers, R. E. (eds.). (2002). Language and literacy in bilingual children. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J. (2010a). Bilingual children's acquisition of English verb morphology: Effects of language exposure, structure complexity, and task type. Language Learning, 60, 651–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J. (2010b). Comparing typically-developing children and children with specific language impairment. In Blom, E. & Unsworth, S. (eds.), Experimental methods in language acquisition research, pp. 223–244. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J. (2011). Individual differences in child English second language acquisition: Comparing child-internal and child-external factors. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 213–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, J., & Genesee, F. (1996). Syntactic acquisition in bilingual children: Autonomous or independent? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, B. Z., Fernández, S. C., Lewedeg, V., & Oller, D. K. (1997). The relation of input factors to lexical learning by bilingual infants. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polišenskà, D. (2010). Dutch children's acquisition of verbal and adjectival inflection. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Prévost, P., & White, L. (2000). Missing surface inflection or impairment in second language acquisition? Evidence from tense and agreement. Second Language Research, 16, 103–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roodenburg, J., & Hulk, A. (2008). Puzzles on grammatical gender. Lingue e Linguaggio, 7, 67–91.Google Scholar
Schlyter, S., & Håkansson, G. (1994). Word order in Swedish as the first language, second language and weaker language in bilinguals. Scandinavian Working Papers on Bilingualism, 9, 49–66.Google Scholar
Sorace, A. (2011). Pinning down the concept of “interface” in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 1, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stöhr, A., Akpinar, D., Bianchi, G., & Kupisch, T. (2012). Gender marking in Italian–German heritage speakers and L2-learners of German. In Braunmueller, K. & Gabriel, C. (eds.), Multilingual individuals, multilingual societies (MIMS), pp. 153–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th edn.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Thomas, E. M., & Gathercole, V. C. M. (2007). Children's productive command of grammatical gender and mutation in welsh: An alternative to rule-based learning. First Language, 27, 251–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, S. (2008). Age and input in the acquisition of grammatical gender in Dutch. Second Language Research, 24, 365–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, S. (in press). Assessing age of onset effects in (early) child L2. Language Acquistion.Google Scholar
Unsworth, S., Argyri, E., Cornips, L., Hulk, A., Sorace, A., & Tsimpli, I. (in press). On the role of age of onset and input in early child bilingualism in Greek and Dutch. Applied Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
Unsworth, S., & Hulk, A. (2009). L1 acquisition of neuter gender in Dutch: Production and judgement. In Costa, J., Castro, A., Lobo, M. & Pratas, F. (eds.), Proceedings of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition 2009, pp. 483–492. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Van Berkum, J. J. A. (1996). The psycholinguistics of grammatical gender: Studies in language comprehension and production. Ph.D. dissertation, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.Google Scholar
van der Velde, M. (2003). Déterminants et pronoms en néerlandais et en français: Syntaxe en acquisition. Ph.D. dissertation, Paris 8.Google Scholar
Weerman, F., Duijnmeijer, I., & Orgassa, A. (2011). Effecten van SLI op nederlandse congruentie. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 16, 30–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, L., Valenzuela, E., Kozlowska-MacGregor, M., & Leung, Y. I. (2004). Gender and number agreement in non-native Spanish. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 105–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar