Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:04:23.318Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Conceptual representations in bicultural bilinguals: An ERP approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 June 2021

Xuan Pan ,
Andy Xiong ,
Olessia Jouravlev  and
Debra Jared
Xuan Pan
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
Andy Xiong
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
Olessia Jouravlev
Affiliation:
Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada
Debra Jared*
Affiliation:
University of Western Ontario, London, Canada
*
Address for correspondence: Debra Jared, Department of Psychology, Brain and Mind Institute, Western Interdisciplinary Research Building, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, CanadaN6A 3K7. Email: djjared@uwo.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigated conceptual representations for translation word pairs in bilinguals who learned their languages in different cultural contexts. Mandarin–English bilinguals were presented with a word, and then a picture, and decided if they matched. Both behavioural and ERP data were collected. In one session, words were in English and in another they were the Mandarin translations. Critical pictures matched the prior word and were either biased to Chinese or Canadian culture. There was an interaction of test language and picture type in RT and errors in the behavioural data, and in five components in the ERP data, indicating that the task was easier when the culture depicted in the picture was congruent with the language of the preceding word. These findings provide evidence that the specific perceptual experiences that bilinguals encounter when learning words in each language have an impact on the semantic features that are activated by those words.

Keywords

bilingualsbiculturalconceptual representationstranslation wordsword–picture matching task
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 24 , Issue 5 , November 2021 , pp. 932 - 944
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ameel, E, Malt, BC, Storms, G and Van Assche, F (2009) Semantic convergence in the bilingual lexicon. Journal of Memory and Language 60, 270–290. doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.10.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameel, E, Storms, G, Malt, BC and Sloman, SA (2005) How bilinguals solve the naming problem. Journal of Memory and Language 53, 60–80. doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, SE and Rugg, MD (1990) Event-related potentials and the semantic matching of pictures. Brain and Cognition 14, 201–212. doi.org/10.1016/0278-2626(90)90029-NCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, LW (1999) Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral & Brain Sciences 22, 577–660. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barsalou, LW, Santos, A, Simmons, WK and Wilson, CD (2008) Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In De Vega, M, Glenberg, AM & Graesser, AC (eds.), Symbols, embodiment, and meaning. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press, pp. 245–284.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199217274.003.0013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D, Mächler, M, Bolker, B and Walker, S (2015) Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 1–48.10.18637/jss.v067.i01CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkes, M, Friesen, DC and Bialystok, E (2018) Cultural context as a biasing factor for language activation in bilinguals. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 33, 1032–1048. doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1446541CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chauncey, K, Holcomb, PJ and Grainger, J (2009) Primed picture naming within and across languages: An ERP investigation. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience 9, 286–303. doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.11.006Google Scholar
De Groot, AMB (1992) Bilingual lexical representation: A closer look at conceptual representations. In Frost, R and Katz, L (eds.), Orthography, phonology, morphology, and meaning. Elsevier: Amsterdam, pp. 389–412. doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62805-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, T, Wahl, A, Buytenhuijs, F, van Halem, N, Al-Jibouri, Z, De Korte, M and Rekké, S (2019). Multilink: A computational model for bilingual word recognition and translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 22, 657–679. doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918000287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, T, and van Heuven, WJB (2002) The architecture of the bilingual word recognition system: From identification to decision. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 5, 175–197. doi.org/10.1017/S1366728902003012CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dong, Y, Gui, S, and MacWhinney, B (2005) Shared and separate meanings in the bilingual mental lexicon. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 8, 221–238. doi:10.1017/S1366728905002270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draschkow, D, Heikel, E, Vo, ML-H, Fiebach, CJ and Sassenhagen, J (2018) No evidence from MVPA for different processes underlying the N300 and N400 incongruity effects in scene processing. Neuropsychologia 120, 9–17. doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.09.016CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eddy, M, Schmid, A and Holcomb, P J (2006) A new approach to tracking the time-course of object perception: Masked repetition priming and event-related brain potentials. Psychophysiology 43, 564–568. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00455.x 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00455.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fang, SY, Zinszer, BD, Malt, BC and Li, P (2016) Bilingual object naming: A connectionist model. Frontiers in Psychology 7, 644. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00644CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Federmeier, KD and Kutas, M (2001) Meaning and modality: Influences of context, semantic memory organization, and perceptual predictability on picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27, 202–224. doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.27.1.202Google ScholarPubMed
Fox, J and Weisberg, S (2019) An R companion to applied regression, second Edition. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. Retrieved from: https://socialsciences.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion-2E/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Ganis, G, Kutas, M and Sereno, MI (1996) The search for “common sense”: An electrophysiological study of the comprehension of words and pictures in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 8, 89–106. doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1996.8.2.89CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glenberg, AM and Robertson, DA (2000) Symbol grounding and meaning: A comparison of high-dimensional and embodied theories of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language 43, 379–401. doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamm, JP, Johnson, BW and Kirk, IJ (2002) Comparison of the N300 and N400 ERPs to picture stimuli in congruent and incongruent contexts. Clinical Neurophysiology 113, 1339–1350. 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00161-X 10.1016/S1388-2457(02)00161-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holcomb, PJ and McPherson, WB (1994) Event-related brain potentials reflect semantic priming in an object decision task. Brain and Cognition 24, 259–276. doi.org/10.1017/S0048577299971196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jared, D, Poh, RPY and Paivio, A (2013) L1 and L2 picture naming in Mandarin– English bilinguals: A test of Bilingual Dual Coding Theory. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16, 383–396. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000685CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiefer, M (2001) Perceptual and semantic sources of category-specific effects: Event-related potentials during picture and word categorization. Memory & Cognition 29, 100–116. doi.org/10.3758/BF03195745CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kiefer, M and Pulvermüller, F (2012) Conceptual representations in mind and brain: Theoretical developments, current evidence and future directions. Cortex 48, 805–825. doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kutas, M and Federmeier, KD (2011) Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology 62, 621–647. doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.131123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lenth, R, Singmann, H, Love, J, Buerkner, P and Herve, M (2019) Package “emmeans”: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. The Comprehensive R Archive Network, 1–67.Google Scholar
Lopez-Calderon, J and Luck, SJ (2014) ERPLAB: An open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8, 213. doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00213CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lupyan, G and Lewis, M (2019) From words-as-mappings to words-as-cues: The role of language in semantic knowledge. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 34, 1319–1337. doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2017.1404114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malt, BC and Lebkuecher, AL (2017) Representation and process in bilingual lexical interaction. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20, 867-885. doi:10.1017/S1366728916000584CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malt, BC, Li, P, Pavlenko, A, Zhu, H and Ameel, E (2015) Bidirectional lexical interaction in late immersed Mandarin-English bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language 82, 86–104. doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.03.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malt, BC and Majid, A (2013) How thought is mapped into words. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 4, 583–597. doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1251Google ScholarPubMed
Malt, BC and Sloman, SA (2003) Linguistic diversity and object naming by non-native speakers of English. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 6, 47–67. http://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728903001020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malt, BC, Sloman, SA, Gennari, S, Shi, M and Wang, Y (1999) Knowing versus naming: Similarity of the linguistic categorization of artifacts. Journal of Memory and Language 40, 230–262. doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A (2007) The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology 58, 25–45. doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matsuki, E, Hino, Y and Jared, D (2021) Understanding semantic accents in Japanese–English bilinguals: A feature-based approach. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 24, 137–153. doi:10.1017/S1366728920000322CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McPherson, WB and Holcomb, PJ (1999) An electrophysiological investigation of semantic priming with pictures of real objects. Psychophysiology 36, 53–65. doi.org/10.1017/S0048577299971196CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Monaco, E, Jost, LB, Gygax, PM and Annoni, JM (2019) Embodied semantics in a second language: Critical review and clinical implications. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 13, 110. doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nigam, AC, Hoffman, JE and Simons, RF (1992) N400 to semantically anomalous pictures and words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 4, 15–22. doi.org/10.1162/jocn.1992.4.1.15CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paivio, A (1971) Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
Paivio, A (1986) Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Paivio, A (2007) Mind and its evolution: A dual-coding theoretical approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Paivio, A and Desrochers, A (1980) A dual-coding approach to bilingual memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology 34, 388–399. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0081101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patterson, K, Nestor, PJ and Rogers, TT (2007) Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8, 976–987. http://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, M (1997) The cognitive neuropsychology of bilingualism. In Groot, De, and Kroll, AMB, JF (eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 331–354.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, A and Malt, BC (2011) Kitchen Russian: Cross-linguistic differences and first-language object naming by Russian–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 14, 19–45. doi:10.1017/S136672891000026XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratarelli, ME (1994) Semantic processing of pictures and spoken words: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Brain and Cognition 24, 137–157. doi.org/10.1006/brcg.1994.1008CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Core Team, R (2019) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from: https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Vigliocco, G, Meteyard, L, Andrews, M and Kousta, S (2009) Toward a theory of semantic representation. Language and Cognition 1, 219–247. doi:10.1515/LANGCOG.2009.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, WC and Holcomb, PJ (2002) Event-related potentials during discourse-level semantic integration of complex pictures. Cognitive Brain Research 13, 363–375. doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(01)00129-XCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willems, RM, Özyürek, A and Hagoort, P (2008) Seeing and hearing meaning: ERP and fMRI evidence of word versus picture integration into a sentence context. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20, 1235–1249. doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20085CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zinszer, B, Malt, B, Ameel, E and Li, P (2014) Native- likeness in second language lexical categorization reflects individual language history and linguistic community norms. Frontiers in Psychology 5, 82–96. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01203CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Supplementary material: File

Pan et al. supplementary material

Pan et al. supplementary material

Download Pan et al. supplementary material(File)
File 49.9 KB