Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:31:23.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Desirable difficulties while learning collocations in a second language: Conditions that induce L1 interference improve learning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 October 2019

Manuel F. Pulido Open the ORCID record for Manuel F. Pulido [Opens in a new window]  and
Paola E. Dussias
Manuel F. Pulido*
Affiliation:
Center for Language Science, Department of Spanish, Italian and Portuguese, Penn State University
Paola E. Dussias
Affiliation:
Center for Language Science, Department of Spanish, Italian and Portuguese, Penn State University
*
Address for correspondence: Manuel F. Pulido, E-mail: mfp149@psu.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Learning conventional verb-noun combinations in a second language is known to be highly problematic when word choices differ from those in the native language. Grounded on recent proposals of desirable difficulties in vocabulary learning (Bjork & Kroll, 2015), we tested Spanish learners of English on a new paradigm that aimed to induce interference from the native language during lexical selection in a second language, as a way to train regulation of the dominant language. Results showed that recall rates were significantly higher in the group of learners that practiced in conditions of L1-interference. Faster RTs showed more efficient lexical selection in those same learners. Additionally, RTs revealed that the more successful learners in both groups incurred a cost in accessing verb choices congruent with the native language, a finding that is consistent with an inhibitory account.

Keywords

multi-word unitssecond language learninginterferencelexical selectionL1 Regulation Hypothesis
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 23 , Issue 3 , May 2020 , pp. 652 - 667
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abutalebi, J (2008) Neural aspects of second language representation and language control. Acta Psychologica 128, 466–478. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2008.03.014CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, MC, Bjork, RA and Bjork, EL (1994) Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20, 1063–1087. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.5.1063Google ScholarPubMed
Arnon, I and Snider, N (2010) More than words: Frequency effects for multi-word phrases. Journal of Memory and Language 62, 67–82. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.09.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, RH, Davidson, DJ and Bates, DM (2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 390–412. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahns, J (1993) Lexical collocations: A contrastive view. ELT Journal 47, 56–63. doi:10.1093/elt/47.1.56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baddeley, A, Papagno, C and Vallar, G (1988) When long-term learning depends on short-term storage. Journal of Memory and Language 27, 586–595. doi:10.1016/0749-596X(88)90028-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bardovi-Harlig, K (2009) Conventional expressions as a pragmalinguistic resource: Recognition and production of conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. Language Learning: A Journal of Research in Language Studies 59, 755–795. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00525.xGoogle Scholar
Bates, D, Maechler, M, Bolker, B and Walker, S (2015) Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67, 1–48. doi:10.18637/jss.v067.i01.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, D, Kliegl, R, Vasishth, S and Baayen, H (2015) Parsimonious mixed models. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.04967Google Scholar
Barr, DJ, Levy, R, Scheepers, C and Tily, HJ (2013) Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language 68, 255–278. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bialystok, E, Craik, FIM, Green, DW and Gollan, TH (2009) Bilingual minds. Psychological Science in the Public Interest 10, 89–129. doi:10.1177/1529100610387084CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Biskup, D (1992) L1 influence on learners’ renderings of English collocations: A Polish/German empirical study. In Arnaud, P. and Bejoint, H. (eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bjork, RA and Bjork, EL (1992) A new theory of disuse and an old theory of stimulus fluctuation. In Healy, A, Kosslyn, S., & Shiffrin, R. (eds.), From Learning Processes to Cognitive Processes: Essays in Honor of William K. Estes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 2, pp. 35–67.Google Scholar
Bjork, RA and Kroll, JF (2015) Desirable difficulties in vocabulary learning. The American Journal of Psychology 128, 241–252. doi:10.5406/amerjpsyc.128.2.0241CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boers, F, Eyckmans, J, Kappel, J, Stengers, H and Demecheleer, M (2006) Formulaic sequences and perceived oral proficiency: Putting a lexical approach to the test. Language Teaching Research 10, 245–261. doi:10.1191/1362168806lr195oaCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F, Demecheleer, M, Coxhead, A and Webb, S (2014) Gauging the effects of exercises on verb–noun collocations. Language Teaching Research 18, 54–74. doi:10.1177/1362168813505389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boers, F and Webb, S (2015) Gauging the semantic transparency of idioms: do natives and learners see eye to eye? In Heredia, RR and Cieślicka, AB (eds.), Bilingual figurative language processing. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 368–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bogulski, CA, Bice, K and Kroll, JF (2018) Bilingualism as a desirable difficulty: Advantages in word learning depend on regulation of the dominant language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1–16. doi:10.1017/S1366728918000858Google ScholarPubMed
Botvinick, MM, Braver, TS, Barch, DM, Carter, CS and Cohen, JD (2001) Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review 108, 624–652.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brenders, P, van Hell, JG and Dijkstra, T (2011) Word recognition in child second language learners: Evidence from cognates and false friends. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 109, 383–396. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2011.03.012CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bybee, JL (2010) Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacciari, C and Tabossi, P (1988) The comprehension of idioms. Journal of Memory and Language 27, 668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caillies, S and Declercq, C (2011) Kill the song – steal the show: What does distinguish predicative metaphors from decomposable idioms? Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 40, 205–223. doi:10.1007/s10936-010-9165-8CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carrol, G and Conklin, K (2017) Cross language lexical priming extends to formulaic units: Evidence from eye-tracking suggests that this idea ‘has legs’. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20, 299–317. doi:10.1017/S1366728915000103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cintrón-Valentín, MC and Ellis, NC (2016) Salience in second language acquisition: Physical form, learner attention, and instructional focus. Frontiers in Psychology 7, 1284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Colombo, L (1993) The comprehension of ambiguous idioms in context. In Cacciari, C. and Tabossi, P. (eds.), Idioms: Processing, structure, and interpretation. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, pp. 163–200.Google Scholar
Council of Europe (2011) Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment. Council of Europe.Google Scholar
Cummins, J (2000) Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire (vol. 23). Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, M (2008) The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 560 million words, 1990-present. https://corpus.byu.edu/coca/Google Scholar
Davies, M (2016) Corpus del Español: Two billion words, 21 countries. http://www.corpusdelespanol.org/web-dial/Google Scholar
Dijkstra, T, Miwa, K, Brummelhuis, B, Sappelli, M and Baayen, H (2010) How cross-language similarity and task demands affect cognate recognition. Journal of Memory and Language 62, 284–301. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2009.12.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijkstra, T, Hell, JGv and Brenders, P (2015) Sentence context effects in bilingual word recognition: Cognate status, sentence language, and semantic constraint. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18, 597–613. doi:10.1017/S1366728914000388CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durrant, P and Doherty, A (2010) Are high-frequency collocations psychologically real? investigating the thesis of collocational priming. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 6, 125–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, NC, Hafeez, K, Martin, KI, Chen, L, Boland, J and Sagarra, N (2012) An eye-tracking study of learned attention in second language acquisition. Applied Psycholinguistics 35, 547–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, NC and Sagarra, N (2010) The bounds of adult language acquisition: Blocking and learned attention. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 32, 552–580.Google Scholar
Elosúa, MR, Gutiérrez, F, García Madruga, JA, Luque, JL and Gárate, M (1996) Adaptación española del reading span test de Daneman y Carpenter. Psicothema 8, 383–395.Google Scholar
English Language Institute. (2001) MELICET – GCVR User's Manual. Ann Arbor, MI.Google Scholar
Eriksen, BA and Eriksen, CW (1974) Effects of noise letters upon the identification of target letters in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics 16, 143–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkbeiner, M and Nicol, J (2003) Semantic category effects in second language word learning. Applied psycholinguistics 24, 369–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García, O and Wei, L (2014) Translanguaging. The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics 1–7.Google Scholar
García, O, Johnson, SI, Seltzer, K and Valdés, G (2017) The translanguaging classroom: Leveraging student bilingualism for learning. Philadelphia, PA: Caslon.Google Scholar
Ghazi-Saidi, L and Ansaldo, AI (2017) Second language word learning through repetition and imitation: Functional networks as a function of learning phase and language distance. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 11, 463–463. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00463CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbs, RW Jr. (1980) Spilling the beans on understanding and memory for idioms in conversation. Memory & Cognition 8, 149–156.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Granger, S (1998) Prefabricated patterns in advanced EFL writing: Collocations and formulae. In Cowie, AP (ed.), Phraseology: Theory, analysis, and applications. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 145–160.Google Scholar
Gries, ST (2013) 50-something years of work on collocations. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 18, 137–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamblin, JL and Gibbs, RW Jr. (1999) Why you can't kick the bucket as you slowly die: Verbs in idiom comprehension. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28, 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartsuiker, RJ, Beerts, S, Loncke, M, Desmet, T and Bernolet, S (2016) Cross-linguistic structural priming in multilinguals: Further evidence for shared syntax. Journal of Memory and Language 90, 14–30. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2016.03.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoshino, N and Thierry, G (2011) Language selection in bilingual word production: Electrophysiological evidence for cross-language competition. Brain Research 1371, 100–109. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.11.053CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ibbotson, P (2013) The scope of usage-based theory. Frontiers in Psychology 4, 255. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00255CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Irujo, S (1984) Don't Put Your Leg in Your Mouth: Transfer in the Acquisition of Idioms in a Second Language. Presented at the Boston University Conference on Language Development, Boston.Google Scholar
Jaeger, TF (2008) Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 434–446. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamin, LJ (1968) “Attention-like” processes in classical conditioning. In Jones, M. R. (ed.), Miami symposium on the prediction of behavior: Aversive stimulation. Coral Gabels, FL: University of Miami Press, pp. 9–31.Google Scholar
Kaushanskaya, M (2012) Cognitive mechanisms of word learning in bilingual and monolingual adults: The role of phonological memory. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15, 1–20. doi:10.1017/S1366728911000472CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kornell, N, Hays, MJ and Bjork, RA (2009) Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 35, 989–998. doi:10.1037/a0015729Google ScholarPubMed
Kroll, JF and Stewart, E (1994) Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language 33, 149–174. doi:10.1006/jmla.1994.1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, R (1987) Foundations of cognitive grammar. Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Laufer, B and Girsai, N (2008) Form-focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning: A case for contrastive analysis and translation. Applied Linguistics 29, 694–716. doi:10.1093/applin/amn018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Libben, MR and Titone, DA (2008) The multidetermined nature of idiom processing. Memory & Cognition 36, 1103–1121. doi:10.3758/MC.36.6.1103CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linck, JA, Osthus, P, Koeth, JT and Bunting, MF (2014) Working memory and second language comprehension and production: A meta-analysis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 21, 861–883. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0565-2CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marian, V, Blumenfeld, HK and Kaushanskaya, M (2007) The language experience and proficiency questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50, 940–967. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067)CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, KI and Ellis, NC (2012) The roles of phonological short-term memory and working memory in L2 grammar and vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 34, 379. doi:10.1017/S0272263112000125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirman, D (2014) Growth curve analysis and visualization using R. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Morett, LM and MacWhinney, B (2013) Syntactic transfer in english-speaking spanish learners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 16, 132–151. doi:10.1017/S1366728912000107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan-Short, K, Faretta-Stutenberg, M, Brill-Schuetz, KA, Carpenter, H and Wong, PC (2014) Declarative and procedural memory as individual differences in second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 17, 56–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesselhauf, N (2003) The use of collocations by advanced learners of English and some implications for teaching. Applied Linguistics 24, 223–242. doi:10.1093/applin/24.2.223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nesselhauf, N (2005) Collocations in a learner corpus. Amsterdam; Philadelphia: J. Benjamins Publishing Company.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, TMH and Webb, S (2017) Examining second language receptive knowledge of collocation and factors that affect learning. Language Teaching Research 21, 298–320. doi:10.1177/1362168816639619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellicer-Sánchez, A (2017) Learning L2 collocations incidentally from reading. Language Teaching Research 21, 381–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, E (2012) Learning german formulaic sequences: The effect of two attention-drawing techniques. The Language Learning Journal 40, 65–79. doi:10.1080/09571736.2012.658224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, E (2016) The learning burden of collocations: The role of interlexical and intralexical factors. Language Teaching Research 20, 113–138. doi:10.1177/1362168814568131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potts, R and Shanks, DR (2014) The benefit of generating errors during learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143, 644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R Core Team (2016) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org/Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Fornells, A, Lugt, Avd, Rotte, M, Britti, B, Heinze, H and Münte, TF (2005) Second language interferes with word production in fluent bilinguals: Brain potential and functional imaging evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17, 422–433. doi:10.1162/0898929053279559CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sasaki, Y (1991) English and Japanese interlanguage comprehension strategies: An analysis based on the competition model. Applied Psycholinguistics 12, 47–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N and Freed, BF (2004) Context, contact, and cognition in oral fluency acquisition: Learning spanish in at home and study abroad contexts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 26, 173–199. doi:10.1017/S0272263104262027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A, Conklin, K, Caffarra, S, Kaan, E and van Heuven, WJB (2017) Representation and processing of multi-word expressions in the brain. Brain and Language 175, 111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siyanova-Chanturia, A, Conklin, K and Schmitt, N (2011) Adding more fuel to the fire: An eye-tracking study of idiom processing by native and non-native speakers. Second Language Research 27, 251–272. doi:10.1177/0267658310382068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, W, Eschman, A and Zuccolotto, A (2002) E-Prime Reference Guide. Pittsburgh: Psychology Software Tools, Incorporated.Google Scholar
Schriefers, H (1992) Lexical access in the production of noun phrases. Cognition 45, 33–54. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90022-ACrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sonbul, S and Schmitt, N (2013) Explicit and implicit lexical knowledge: Acquisition of collocations under different input conditions: Explicit and implicit lexical knowledge. Language Learning 63, 121–159. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00730.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprenger, SA, Levelt, WJM and Kempen, G (2006) Lexical access during the production of idiomatic phrases. Journal of Memory & Language 54, 161–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stroop, JR (1935) Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 18, 643–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sunderman, G and Kroll, JF (2009) When study-abroad experience fails to deliver: The internal resources threshold effect. Applied Psycholinguistics 30, 79–99. doi:10.1017/S0142716408090048CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Szudarski, P and Carter, R (2016) The role of input flood and input enhancement in EFL learners' acquisition of collocations: L2 input types and acquisition of collocations. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 26, 245–265. doi:10.1111/ijal.12092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thierry, G and Wu, YJ (2007) Brain potentials reveal unconscious translation during foreign language comprehension. Proceeding of National Academy of Sciences 104, 12530–12535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Titone, DA and Connine, CM (1999) On the compositional and noncompositional nature of idiomatic expressions. Journal of Pragmatics 31, 1655–1674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titone, DA and Libben, MR (2014) Time-dependent effects of decomposability, familiarity and literal plausibility on idiom meaning activation: A cross-modal priming investigation. The Mental Lexicon 9, 473–496. doi:10.1075/ml.9.3.05titGoogle Scholar
Tolentino, LC, & Tokowicz, N (2011) Across languages, space, and time: A review of the role of cross-language similarity in L2 (morpho)syntactic processing as revealed by fMRI and ERP methods. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 33, 91–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tolentino, LC and Tokowicz, N (2014) Cross-Language similarity modulates effectiveness of second language grammar instruction. Language Learning 64, 279–309. doi:10.1111/lang.12048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S and Kagimoto, E (2010) Learning collocations: Do the number of collocates, position of the node word, and synonymy affect learning? Applied Linguistics 32, 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, S, Newton, J and Chang, A (2013) Incidental learning of collocation. Language Learning 63, 91–120. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2012.00729.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, LJ, Alexander, A and Greenfield, DB (2017) The relationship between executive functioning and language: Examining vocabulary, syntax, and language learning in preschoolers attending head start. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 164, 16–31. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.06.010CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wolter, B and Gyllstad, H (2011) Collocational links in the L2 mental lexicon and the influence of L1 intralexical knowledge. Applied Linguistics 32, 430–449. doi:10.1093/applin/amr011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolter, B and Gyllstad, H (2013) Frequency of input and L2 collocational processing: A comparison of congruent and incongruent collocations. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 35, 451. doi:10.1017/S0272263113000107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolter, B and Yamashita, J (2015) Processing collocations in a second language: A case of first language activation? Applied Psycholinguistics 36, 1193–1221. doi:10.1017/S0142716414000113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamashita, J and Jiang, N (2010) L1 influence on the acquisition of L2 collocations: Japanese ESL users and EFL learners acquiring English collocations. TESOL Quarterly 44, 647–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeganehjoo, M and Thai, YN (2012) Lexical access in production of idioms by proficient L2 learners. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies 18, 87–104.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Pulido and Dussias supplementary material

Pulido and Dussias supplementary material

Download Pulido and Dussias supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 304.2 KB