Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T06:55:32.716Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of speaker certainty on novel word learning in monolingual and bilingual children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2018

MILIJANA BUAC ,
AURÉLIE TAUZIN-LARCHÉ ,
EMILY WEISBERG  and
MARGARITA KAUSHANSKAYA
MILIJANA BUAC
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Madison
AURÉLIE TAUZIN-LARCHÉ
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Madison
EMILY WEISBERG
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Madison
MARGARITA KAUSHANSKAYA*
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin-Madison
*
Address for correspondence: Margarita Kaushanskaya, Waisman Center Room 476, 1500 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53705kaushanskaya@wisc.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the present study, we examined the effect of speaker certainty on word-learning performance in English-speaking monolingual (MAge = 6.40) and Spanish–English bilingual (MAge = 6.58) children. No group differences were observed when children learned novel words from a certain speaker. However, bilingual children were more willing to learn novel words from an uncertain speaker than their monolingual peers. These findings indicate that language experience influences how children weigh cues to speaker credibility during learning and suggest that children with more diverse linguistic backgrounds (i.e., bilinguals) are less prone to prioritizing information based on speaker certainty.

Keywords

bilingualismspeaker certaintyword learning
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , August 2019 , pp. 883 - 895
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*The present project was supported by NIDCD Grants R03 DC010465 and R01 DC011750, and Training Grant T32 DC005359-10. The authors wish to express gratitude to all of the families who participated in the present study, the numerous schools in the Madison Metropolitan school district who generously aided in participant recruitment, and the members of the Language Acquisition and Bilingualism Lab for their invaluable assistance with data collection.

References

Barth, H., Bhandari, K., Garcia, J., MacDonald, K., & Chase, E. (2014). Preschoolers trust novel members of accurate speakers' groups and judge them favourably. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67 (5), 872–883.Google Scholar
Bassetti, B. (2007). Bilingualism and thought: Grammatical gender and concepts of objects in Italian-German bilingual children. International Journal of Bilingualism, 11 (3), 251–273.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., and Walker, S. (2015). lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S. R package version 1.1-9, URL: https://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=lme4.Google Scholar
Bergstra, M., De Mulder, H., & Coopmans, P. (2013). Children's ability to use speaker certainty in learning novel words. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 30 (1), 1–12.Google Scholar
Bion, R., Borovsky, A., & Fernald, A. (2013). Fast mapping, slow learning: Disambiguation of novel word-object mappings in relation to vocabulary learning at 18, 24, and 30 months. Cognition, 126, 39–53.Google Scholar
Birch, S. A., Akmal, N., & Frampton, K. L. (2010). Two‐year‐olds are vigilant of others’ non‐verbal cues to credibility. Developmental Science, 13 (2), 363–369. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00906.xGoogle Scholar
Birch, S. A., Vauthier, S. A., & Bloom, P. (2008). Three-and four-year-olds spontaneously use others’ past performance to guide their learning. Cognition, 107 (3), 1018–1034.Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2014). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [Computer program]. Version 5.4.04. Retrieved from http://www.praat.org/Google Scholar
Brojde, C. L., Ahmed, S., & Colunga, E. (2012). Bilingual and monolingual children attend to different cues when learning new words. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00155Google Scholar
Byers‐Heinlein, K., & Werker, J. F. (2009). Monolingual, bilingual, trilingual: infants' language experience influences the development of a word‐learning heuristic. Developmental Science, 12 (5), 815–823. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00902.xGoogle Scholar
Camarota, S. A. (2012). Immigrants in the United States, 2012: A profile of America's foreign-born population. Washington, DC: Center for Immigration Studies.Google Scholar
Corriveau, K., & Harris, P. L. (2009a). Choosing your informant: Weighing familiarity and recent accuracy. Developmental Science, 12 (3), 426–437.Google Scholar
Corriveau, K., & Harris, P. L. (2009b). Preschoolers continue to trust a more accurate informant 1 week after exposure to accuracy information. Developmental Science, 12 (1), 188–193.Google Scholar
Corriveau, K. H., Kurkul, K., & Arunachalam, S. (2016). Preschoolers' Preference for Syntactic Complexity Varies by Socioeconomic Status. Child development, 87 (5), 1529–1537.Google Scholar
Corriveau, K. H., Meints, K., & Harris, P. L. (2009). Early tracking of informant accuracy and inaccuracy. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 27 (2), 331–342.Google Scholar
Davidson, D., & Tell, D. (2005). Monolingual and bilingual children's use of mutual exclusivity in the naming of whole objects. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 92 (1), 25–45. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2005.03.007Google Scholar
Davidson, D., Jergovic, D., Imami, Z., & Theodos, V. (1997). Monolingual and bilingual children's use of the mutual exclusivity constraint. Journal of Child Language, 24 (01), 3–24.Google Scholar
DeJesus, J. M., Hwang, H. G., Dautel, J. B., & Kinzler, K. D. (2017). Bilingual children's social preferences hinge on accent. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 164, 178–191.Google Scholar
Diesendruck, G. (2005). The principles of conventionality and contrast in word learning: an empirical examination. Developmental Psychology, 41 (3), 451. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.41.3.451Google Scholar
Fan, S. P., Liberman, Z., Keysar, B., & Kinzler, K. D. (2015). The exposure advantage: Early exposure to a multilingual environment promotes effective communication. Psychological Science, 26 (7), 1090–1097.Google Scholar
Fennell, C. T., Byers‐Heinlein, K., & Werker, J. F. (2007). Using speech sounds to guide word learning: The case of bilingual infants. Child development, 78 (5), 1510–1525.Google Scholar
Fernald, A. (2006). When infants hear two languages: Interpreting research on early speech perception by bilingual children. Childhood Bilingualism: Research on Infancy through School Age, 19–29.Google Scholar
Ganea, P. A., Koenig, M. A., & Millett, K. G. (2011). Changing your mind about things unseen: Toddlers’ sensitivity to prior reliability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 109 (4), 445–453.Google Scholar
Gupta, P., Lipinski, J., Abbs, B., Lin, P.H., Aktunc, E., Ludden, D., Martin, N., & Newman, R. (2004). Space aliens and nonwords: Stimuli for investigating the learning of novel word-meaning pairs. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36 (4), 599–603.Google Scholar
Healey, E., & Skarabela, B. (2008). Are children willing to accept two labels for a single object?: A comparative study of mutual exclusivity in monolingual and bilingual children. Child Language Seminar 2007, 48.Google Scholar
Hoff, E., Core, C., Place, S., Rumiche, R., Señor, M., & Parra, M. (2012). Dual language exposure and early bilingual development. Journal of Child Language, 39 (01), 1–27. doi: 10.1017/S0305000910000759Google Scholar
Houston‐Price, C., Caloghiris, Z., & Raviglione, E. (2010). Language experience shapes the development of the mutual exclusivity bias. Infancy, 15 (2), 125–150.Google Scholar
Jaswal, V. K., & Hansen, M. B. (2006). Learning words: Children disregard some pragmatic information that conflicts with mutual exclusivity. Developmental science, 9 (2), 158–165.Google Scholar
Jaswal, V. K., & Neely, L. A. (2006). Adults don't always know best preschoolers use past reliability over age when learning new words. Psychological Science, 17 (9), 757–758.Google Scholar
Kalashnikova, M., & Mattock, K. (2014). Maturation of executive functioning skills in early sequential bilingualism. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 17 (1), 111–123.Google Scholar
Kaufman, A. S. (2004). KBIT-2: Kaufman Brief Intelligence Test. Minneapolis, MN: NCS Pearson.Google Scholar
Kaushanskaya, M., & Marian, V. (2009). The bilingual advantage in novel word learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16 (4), 705–710.Google Scholar
Kaushanskaya, M., Gross, M., & Buac, M. (2014). Effects of classroom bilingualism on task‐ shifting, verbal memory, and word learning in children. Developmental science, 17 (4), 564–583.Google Scholar
Kinzler, K. D., Corriveau, K. H., & Harris, P. L. (2011). Children's selective trust in native‐accented speakers. Developmental Science, 14 (1), 106–111.Google Scholar
Koenig, M. A., & Echols, C. H. (2003). Infants' understanding of false labeling events: The referential roles of words and the speakers who use them. Cognition, 87 (3), 179–208. https://doi.org/110.1016/S0010-0277(03)00002-7Google Scholar
Koenig, M.A., & Harris, P.L. (2005). Preschoolers mistrust ignorant and inaccurate speakers.Child Development, 76, 1261–1277.Google Scholar
Krahmer, E., & Swerts, M. (2005). How children and adults produce and perceive uncertainty in audiovisual speech. Language and Speech, 48 (1), 29–54.Google Scholar
Lee, V. E., & Burkam, D. T. (2002). Inequality at the starting gate: Social background differences in achievement as children begin school. Economic Policy Institute; Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50 (4), 940–967.Google Scholar
Markman, E. M., & Wachtel, G.F. (1988). Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology, 20, 121–157.Google Scholar
Merriman, W., & Kutlesic, V. (1993). Bilingual and monolingual children's use of two lexical acquisition heuristics. Applied Psycholinguistics, 14, 229–249. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400009565Google Scholar
Murphey, D., Guzman, L., & Torres, A. M. (2014). America's Hispanic children: Gaining ground, looking forward. Child Trends.Google Scholar
Nash, M., & Donaldson, M. L. (2005). Word learning in children with vocabulary deficits. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 439–458.Google Scholar
Nelson, K. E., Welsh, J. A., Vance Trup, E. M., & Greenberg, M. T. (2011). Language delays of impoverished preschool children in relation to early academic and emotion recognition skills. First Language, 31, 164–194.Google Scholar
Pasquini, E. S., Corriveau, K. H., Koenig, M., & Harris, P. L. (2007). Preschoolers monitor the relative accuracy of informants. Developmental psychology, 43 (5), 1216.Google Scholar
Place, S., & Hoff, E. (2011). Properties of dual language exposure that influence 2‐year‐olds'bilingual proficiency. Child Development, 82 (6), 1834–1849.Google Scholar
Rosenblum, T., & Pinker, S. A. (1983). Word magic revisited: Monolingual and bilingual children's understanding of the word-object relationship. Child Development, 773–780.Google Scholar
Sabbagh, M. A., & Baldwin, D. A. (2001). Learning words from knowledgeable versus ignorant speakers: Links between preschoolers' theory of mind and semantic development. Child Development, 1054–1070. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00334Google Scholar
Scofield, J., & Behrend, D. A. (2008). Learning words from reliable and unreliable speakers. Cognitive Development, 23 (2), 278–290.Google Scholar
Semel, E.M., Wiig, E.H., & Secord, W. (2003). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals (CELF-4). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Souza, A. L., Byers-Heinlein, K., & Poulin-Dubois, D. (2013). Bilingual and monolingual children prefer native-accented speakers. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 953.Google Scholar
Stanislaw, H., & Todorov, N. (1999). Calculation of signal detection theory measures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31 (1), 137–149.Google Scholar
Szekely, A., Jacobsen, T., D'Amico, S., Devescovi, A., Andonova, E., Herron, D., Lu, C.C., Pechmann, T., Pléh, C., Wicha, N., Federmeier, K., Gerdjikova, I., Gutierrez, G., Hung, D., Hsu, J., Iyer, G., Kohnert, K., Mehotcheva, T., Orozco-Figueroa, A., Tzeng, A., Tzeng, O., Arévalo, A., Vargha, A., Butler, A., Buffington, R., & Bates, E. (2004). A new on-line resource for psycholinguistic studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 51 (2), 247–250.Google Scholar
Unsworth, S. (2016). Quantity and quality of language input in bilingual language development. In Nicoladis, E. & Montanari, S. (Eds.), Lifespan perspectives on bilingualism (pp. 136–196). Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Mouton/APA.Google Scholar
Vagh, S. B., Pan, B. A., & Mancilla‐Martinez, J. (2009). Measuring growth in bilingual and monolingual children's English productive vocabulary development: The utility of combining parent and teacher report. Child Development, 80 (5), 1545–1563.Google Scholar
Wiig, E.H., Semel, E.M., & Secord, W. (2006). Clinical Evaluation of Language Fundamentals – Fourth Edition, Spanish. (CELF-4 Spanish). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Yow, W. Q., & Markman, E. M. (2011a). Young bilingual children's heightened sensitivity to referential cues. Journal of Cognition and Development, 12 (1), 12–31.Google Scholar
Yow, W. Q., & Markman, E. M. (2011b). Bilingualism and children's use of paralinguistic cues to interpret emotion in speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 14 (04), 562–569.Google Scholar
Yow, W. Q., & Markman, E. M. (2015). A bilingual advantage in how children integrate multiple cues to understand a speaker's referential intent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18 (03), 391–399.Google Scholar