Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T11:12:31.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Executive control mechanisms in bilingualism: Beyond speed of processing*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2016

KLARA MARTON ,
MIRA GORAL ,
LUCA CAMPANELLI ,
JUNGMEE YOON  and
LORAINE K. OBLER
KLARA MARTON*
Affiliation:
The Graduate School and University Center of the City University of New York Bárczi Gusztáv College of Special Education of Eötvös Loránd University
MIRA GORAL
Affiliation:
The Graduate School and University Center of the City University of New York Lehman College of the City University of New York
LUCA CAMPANELLI
Affiliation:
The Graduate School and University Center of the City University of New York
JUNGMEE YOON
Affiliation:
The Graduate School and University Center of the City University of New York
LORAINE K. OBLER
Affiliation:
The Graduate School and University Center of the City University of New York
*
Address for correspondence: Klara Marton, Ph.D., The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, 365 Fifth Avenue, Rm. 7107, New York NY 10016–4309kmarton@gc.cuny.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The question of interest in this study was whether bilingual individuals show superior executive control compared to monolingual participants. Findings are mixed, with studies showing advantage, disadvantage, or no difference between bilingual and monolingual speakers. In this study, we used different experimental conditions to examine implicit learning, resistance to interference, monitoring, and switching, independently. In addition, we matched our monolingual and bilingual participants on baseline response time. Bilingual participants demonstrated faster implicit learning, greater resistance to interference, more efficient switching compared to monolingual participants. The groups did not differ in monitoring. In conclusion, depending on task complexity and on the target executive control component, there are different patterns of bilingual advantage, beyond the global faster processing speed documented in previous studies. Bilingual young adults showed more efficient adjustments of the cognitive system in response to changes in task demands.

Keywords

bilingual advantagecognitive flexibilityexecutive controlspeed of processing
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , May 2017 , pp. 613 - 631
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Supplementary material can be found online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000930
*

The stimuli for this study were developed within a project that was supported by a grant from the National Institutes of Health-National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, 1R15DC009040-01, entitled “The Impact of Inhibition Control on Working Memory in Children With SLI,” awarded to Klara Marton, principal investigator. The study was further supported by an internal PSC-CUNY grant entitled “Executive Functions and Language Processing Across the Lifespan” awarded to Mira Goral, P.I.

References

Austin, P. C. (2011). An introduction to propensity score methods for reducing the effects of confounding in observational studies. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46 (3), 399–424.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I., Klein, R., & Viswanathan, M. (2004). Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: evidence from the Simon task. Psychology and Aging, 19 (2), 290–303.Google Scholar
Bialystok, E., Craik, F. I., & Luk, G. (2012). Bilingualism: Consequences for mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16 (4), 240–250.Google Scholar
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108 (3), 624–652.Google Scholar
Cepeda, N. J., Blackwell, K. A., & Munakata, Y. (2013). Speed isn't everything: Complex processing speed measures mask individual differences and developmental changes in executive control. Developmental Science, 16 (2), 269–286.Google Scholar
Colzato, L. S., Bajo, M. T., van den Wildenberg, W., Paolieri, D., Nieuwenhuis, S., La Heij, W., & Hommel, B. (2008). How does bilingualism improve executive control? A comparison of active and reactive inhibition mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34 (2), 302–312.Google Scholar
Costa, A., Hernández, M., Costa-Faidella, J., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2009). On the bilingual advantage in conflict processing: Now you see it, now you don't. Cognition, 113 (2), 135–149.Google Scholar
Costa, A., Hernández, M., & Sebastián-Gallés, N. (2008). Bilingualism aids conflict resolution: Evidence from the ANT task. Cognition, 106, 59–86.Google Scholar
Dutilh, G., Vandekerckhove, J., Forstmann, B. U., Keuleers, E., Brysbaert, M., & Wagenmakers, E. J. (2012). Testing theories of post-error slowing. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 74 (2), 454–465.Google Scholar
Eling, P., Derckx, K., & Maes, R. (2008). On the historical and conceptual background of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Brain and Cognition, 67 (3), 247–253.Google Scholar
Fan, J., McCandliss, B. D., Sommer, T., Raz, A., & Posner, M. I. (2002). Testing the efficiency and independence of attentional networks. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14 (3), 340–347.Google Scholar
Gollan, T. H., Montoya, R. I., Cera, C., & Sandoval, T. C. (2008). More use almost always means a smaller frequency effect: Aging, bilingualism, and the weaker links hypothesis. Journal of Memory and Language, 58 (3), 787–814.Google Scholar
Green, D. W., & Abutalebi, J. (2013). Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25 (5), 515–530.Google Scholar
Hall, W. S., Nagy, W. E., Linn, R. L., & Bruce, B. (1984). Spoken Words, Effects of Situation and Social Group on Oral Word Usage and Frequency (Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Associates).Google Scholar
Henik, A., Bibi, U., Yanai, M., & Tzelgov, J. (1997). The Stroop effect is largest during first trials. Psychonomic Society, 2, 57.Google Scholar
Hernández, M., Martin, C. D., Barcelo, F., & Costa, A. (2013). Where is the bilingual advantage in task-switching? Journal of Memory and Language, 69, 257–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilchey, M. D., Saint-Aubin, J., & Klein, R. M. (2015). Does bilingual exercise enhance cognitive fitness in non-linguistic executive processing tasks. Cambridge Handbook of Bilingual Processing.Google Scholar
Hilchey, M.D., & Klein, M. (2011). Are there bilingual advantages on nonlinguistic interference tasks? Implications for the plasticity of executive control processes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18, 625–658. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00309 Google Scholar
Ibrahim, R., Shoshani, R., Prior, A., & Share, D. (2013). Bilingualism and measures of spontaneous and reactive cognitive flexibility. Psychology, 4 (7A), 1–10.Google Scholar
Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59 (4), 434–446.Google Scholar
Kane, M. J., & Engle, R. W. (2003). Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: The contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132 (1), 47–70.Google Scholar
Kongs, S. K., Thompson, L. L., Iverson, G. L., & Heaton, R. K. (2000). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test-64 Card Version (WCST-64). Psychological Assessment Resources. Odessa, FL.Google Scholar
Kousaie, S., Sheppard, C., Lemieux, M., Monetta, L., & Taler, V. (2014). Executive function and bilingualism in young and older adults. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8 (250), 1–29.Google Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & Bialystok, E. (2013). Understanding the consequences of bilingualism for language processing and cognition. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25 (5), 497–514.Google Scholar
Leuven, E., & Sianesi, B. (2003). PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full Mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing (Version 4.0.10). Retrieved from http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s432001.html Google Scholar
Marian, V., Blumenfeld, H. K., & Kaushanskaya, M. (2007). The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing language profiles in bilinguals and multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50 (4), 940–967.Google Scholar
Marton, K. (2015). Theoretically driven experiments may clarify questions about the bilingual advantage. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18 (1), 37–38.Google Scholar
Marton, K., Campanelli, L., Eichorn, N., Scheuer, J., & Yoon, J. (2014). Information processing and proactive interference in children with and without Specific Language Impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57 (1), 106–119.Google Scholar
Miller, A. E., Watson, J. M., & Strayer, D. L. (2012). Individual differences in working memory capacity predict action monitoring and the error-related negativity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38 (3), 757–763.Google Scholar
Monsell, S. (2003). Task switching. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7 (3), 134–140.Google Scholar
Morales, J., Gómez-Ariza, C. J., & Bajo, M. T. (2013). Dual mechanisms of cognitive control in bilinguals and monolinguals. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 25 (5), 531–546.Google Scholar
Morton, J. B., & Munakata, Y. (2002). Active versus latent representations: A neural network model of perseveration, dissociation, and decalage. Developmental Psychobiology, 40 (3), 255–265.Google Scholar
Muysken, P. (2000). Bilingual speech: A typology of code-mixing (Vol. 11). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oberauer, K. (2005). Binding and inhibition in working memory: Individual and age differences in short-term recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134 (3), 368–387.Google Scholar
O'Donnell, J. P., MacGregor, L. A., Dabrowski, J. J., Oestreicher, J. M., & Romero, J. J. (1994). Construct validity of neuropsychological tests of conceptual and attentional abilities. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 50 (4), 596–600.Google Scholar
Paap, K. R., & Greenberg, Z.I. (2013). There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognitive Psychology, 66, 232–258.Google Scholar
Prior, A. (2012). Too much of a good thing: Stronger bilingual inhibition leads to larger lag-2 task repetition costs. Cognition, 125 (1), 1–12.Google Scholar
Prior, A., & Gollan, T. H. (2011). Good language-switchers are good task-switchers: Evidence from Spanish–English and Mandarin–English bilinguals. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 17 (04), 682–691.Google Scholar
Prior, A., & MacWhinney, B. (2010). A bilingual advantage in task switching. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13 (02), 253–262.Google Scholar
Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1984). Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 79 (387), 516–524.Google Scholar
Salvatierra, J. L., & Rosselli, M. (2011). The effect of bilingualism and age on inhibitory control. International Journal of Bilingualism, 15, 26–37.Google Scholar
Soveri, A., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., & Laine, M. (2011). Is there a relationship between language switching and executive functions in bilingualism? Introducing a within-group analysis approach. Frontiers in Psychology. Cognition. August 1, 2011. doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00183 Google Scholar
StataCorp. (2013). Stata Statistical Software: Release 13. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP.Google Scholar
Tokowicz, N., Michael, E. B., & Kroll, J. F. (2004). The roles of study-abroad experience and working-memory capacity in the types of errors made during translation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 7, 255–272. doi:10.1017/S1366728904001634.Google Scholar
Valian, V. V. (2015). Bilingualism and cognition. Journal of Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 18 (1), 3–24.Google Scholar
Yudes, C., Mazico, P., & Bajo, T. (2011). The influence of expertise in simultaneous interpreting on non-verbal executive processes. Frontiers in Psychology, 2 (309) 1–9.Google Scholar
Zelazo, P. D., & Frye, D. (1998). Cognitive complexity and control: II. The development of executive function in childhood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 121–126.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Marton supplementary material

Tables S1-S4

Download Marton supplementary material(File)
File 25.6 KB