Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-vqtzn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-28T00:09:50.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From fuzzy to fine-grained representations in the developing lexicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2021

Isabelle Darcy Open the ORCID record for Isabelle Darcy [Opens in a new window]
Isabelle Darcy*
Affiliation:
Indiana University, Bloomington, USA.
*
Address for correspondence: Isabelle Darcy, E-mail: idarcy@indiana.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

fuzzy lexical representationsbilingual mental lexiconL2 learners

Information

Type
Peer Commentaries
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , March 2022 , pp. 206 - 207
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Bordag, D, Gor, K and Opitz, A (2021) Ontogenesis model of the L2 lexical representation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, SV and Gor, K (2015) Lexical access in L2: Representational deficit or processing constraint? The Mental Lexicon 10, 247–270. doi:10.1075/ml.10.2.04cooCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darcy, I and Thomas, T (2019) When blue is a disyllabic word: Perceptual epenthesis in the mental lexicon of second language learners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22, 1141–1159. doi:10.1017/S1366728918001050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobel, C, Lagemann, L and Zwitserlood, P (2009) Non-native phonemes in adult word learning: evidence from the N400 m. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London 364, 3697–3709. doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dupoux, E, Sebastián-Gallés, N, Navarrete, E and Peperkamp, S (2008) Persistent stress ‘deafness': The case of French learners of Spanish. Cognition 106, 682–706.10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.001CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gierut, JA (2016) Nexus to Lexis: Phonological Disorders in Children. Seminars in speech and language 37, 280–290. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1587704Google ScholarPubMed
Hulstijn, J (2001) Intentional and incidental second-language vocabulary learning. In Robinson, P (ed), Cognition and Second Language Instruction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 258–286.10.1017/CBO9781139524780.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lahiri, A and Reetz, H (2002) Underspecified recognition. In Gussenhoven, C and Warner, N (eds), Laboratory Phonology 7. New York, Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter, pp. 636–675.Google Scholar
Otake, T and Cutler, A (1999) Perception of suprasegmental structure in a non-native dialect. Journal of Phonetics 27, 229–253.10.1006/jpho.1999.0095CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pajak, B, Creel, SC and Levy, R (2016) Difficulty in learning similar-sounding words: A developmental stage or a general property of learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 42, 1377–1399. doi:10.1037/xlm0000247Google ScholarPubMed
Stoel-Gammon, C (2011) Relationships between lexical and phonological development in young children. Journal of Child Language 38, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000910000425CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, KS, Yee, E, Blumstein, SE and Morgan, JL (2013) Adults show less sensitivity to phonetic detail in unfamiliar words, too. Journal of Memory and Language 68, 362–378. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.01.003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed