Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T05:36:43.294Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How fuzzy are L2 phonological representations?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2022

Janet Nicol
Janet Nicol*
Affiliation:
Departments of Linguistics and Psychology & Program in Cognitive Science, University of Arizona, Tucson, USA
*
Address for correspondence: Department of Linguistics, P.O. Box 210025, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA. nicol@arizona.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

Second languagelexiconL2 representations
Type
Peer Commentaries
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 25 , Issue 2 , March 2022 , pp. 230 - 231
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bordag, D, Gor, K and Opitz, A (2021) Ontogenesis model of the L2 lexical representation. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728921000250Google Scholar
Cook, S, Pandža, NB, Lancaster, AK and Gor, K (2016) Fuzzy nonnative phonolexical representations lead to fuzzy form-to-meaning mappings. Frontiers in Psychology 7, 1345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed