Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T05:43:32.615Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Let's not forget the role of deafness in sign/speech bilingualism*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2015

BENCIE WOLL  and
MAIRÉAD MACSWEENEY
BENCIE WOLL
Affiliation:
ESRC Deafness, Cognition and Language Research Centre (DCAL), University College London, UK
MAIRÉAD MACSWEENEY*
Affiliation:
ESRC Deafness, Cognition and Language Research Centre (DCAL), University College London, UK Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, UK
*
Address for correspondence: Mairead MacSweeney, Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, 17 Queen Square London WC1N 3ARm.macsweeney@ucl.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Emmorey, Giezen and Gollan (Emmorey, Giezen & Gollan) address the fascinating question of what can be learnt about language, cognition and the brain from the unique group of people who have grown up learning both a signed and a spoken language. The focus of their review is hearing individuals – referred to as hearing bimodal bilinguals. The review presents an excellent overview of research in this field and highlights the unique insights that this population can provide.

Type
Peer Commentaries
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , March 2016 , pp. 253 - 255
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

We acknowledge the support of a Wellcome Trust Fellowship to MM (GR075214MA) and a Centre Grant from the Economic and Social Research Council of Great Britain (RES-620-28-6001) to B.W. and M.M.

References

Bank, R., Crasborn, O., & van Hout, R. (2011). Variation in mouth actions with manual signs in Sign Language of the Netherlands (NGT). Sign Language & Linguistics 14 (2): 248–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capek, C., Woll, B., MacSweeney, M., Waters, D., David, A.S., McGuire, P.K., Brammer, M., & Campbell, R. (2008). Both Hand and Mouth: Cortical correlates of lexical processing in BSL and speechreading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20 (7), 1220–1234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Vos, C., & Zeshan, U. (2012). Demographic, sociocultural and linguistic variation across rural signing communities. In Zeshan, U & de Vos, C (eds.) Sign languages in village communities: anthropological and linguistic insights. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 2–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebbinghaus, H., & Hessmann, J. (2001). Sign language as multidimensional communication: why manual signs, mouthings and mouth gestures are three different things. In Boyes-Braem, P., & Sutton-Spence, R.L., (Eds.) The hands are the head of the mouth: the mouth as articulator in sign languages. Hamburg: Signum Press, pp. 133–151.Google Scholar
Emmorey, K., Giezen, M. R., & Gollan, T. H. (in press). Psycholinguistic, cognitive, and neural implications of bimodal bilingualism. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. doi: 10.1017/S1366728915000085CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmorey, K., Weisberg, J., McCullough, S., & Petrich, J. A. F. (2013). Mapping the reading circuitry for skilled deaf readers: An fMRI study of semantic and phonological processing. Brain and Language, 126, 169–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hohenberger, A. & Happ, D. (2001). The linguistic primacy of signs and mouth gestures over mouthing: evidence from language production in German Sign Language. In Boyes-Braem, P., & Sutton-Spence, R.L., (Eds.) The hands are the head of the mouth: the mouth as articulator in sign languages. Hamburg: Signum Press, pp. 153–190.Google Scholar
Kubus, O., Villwock, A., Morford, J.P., & Rathmann, C. (2014). Word recognition in deaf readers: Cross-language activation of German Sign Language and German. Applied Psycholinguistics, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716413000520. Published online: 27 January 2014.Google Scholar
MacSweeney, M., Brammer, M., Waters, D., & Goswami, U. (2009). Enhanced activation of the left inferior frontal gyrus in deaf and dyslexic adults during rhyming. Brain (132), 1928–1940 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mayberry, R. I., del Giudice, A. A., & Lieberman, A. M. (2011). Reading achievement in relation to phonological coding and awareness in deaf readers: A meta-analysis. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16, 2, 164–188 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mohammed, T., Campbell, R., MacSweeney, M., Barry, F., & Coleman, M. (2006). Speechreading and its association with reading among deaf, hearing and dyslexic individuals. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 20 (7–8), 621–630 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mohr, S. (2012). The visual-gestural modality and beyond: mouthings as a language contact phenomenon in Irish Sign Language. Sign Language & Lingusitics 15 (2): 185–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadolske, M.A., & Rosenstock, R. (2007). The occurrence of mouthings in American Sign Language: a preliminary study. In Perniss, P., Pfau, R., & Steinbach, M. (Eds.) Visible variation: comparatie studies on sign language structure. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 35–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyst, V.A.S. (2007). A descriptive analysis of Adamorobe Sign Language (Ghana). Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Piñar, P., Dussias, P., & Morford, J. (2011). Deaf readers as bilinguals: an examination of Deaf readers’ print comprehension in light of current advances in bilingualism and second language processing. Language and Linguistics Compass 5: 691–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van de Sande, I., & Crasborn, O. (2009). Lexically bound mouth actions in Sign Language of the Netherlands: a comparison between different registers and age groups. Linguistics in the Netherlands 26: 78–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schermer, T. (1990). In search of a language: Influences from spoken Dutch on Sign Language of the Netherlands. Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
Schuit, J. (2013). Signing in the Arctic: external influences on Inuit Sign Language. In Zeshan, U., & de Vos, C., (Eds.). Sign languages in village communities: anthropological and linguistic insights. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, pp. 181–208.Google Scholar
Sutton-Spence, R.L. (1994) The role of the manual alphabet and fingerspelling in British Sign Language. PhD Thesis, University of BristolGoogle Scholar
Sutton-Spence, R.L. (2007). Mouthings and simultaneity in British Sign Language. In Vermeerbergen, M., Leeson, L., & Crasborn, O. (Eds.) Simultaneity in signed languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 147–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutton-Spence, RL., & Day, L. (2001). Mouthings and mouth gestures in British Sign Language (BSL). In Boyes-Braem, P. & Sutton-Spence, R.L. (eds.) The hands are the head of the mouth: the mouth as articulator in sign languages. Hamburg: Signum Press, pp. 69–86.Google Scholar
Vinson, D.P., Thompson, R., Skinner, R., Fox, N., & Vigliocco, G. (2010). The hands and mouth do not always slip together in British Sign Language: dissociating articulatory channels in the lexicon. Psychological Science 21 (8): 1158–1167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt-Svendsen, M. (1981). Mouth position & mouth movement in Norwegian Sign Language. Sign Language Studies 33 (1): 363–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogt-Svendsen, M. (2001). A comparison of mouth gestures and mouthings in Norwegian Sign Language (NSL). In Boyes-Braem, P. & Sutton-Spence, R.L. (Eds.) The hands are the head of the mouth: the mouth as articulator in sign languages. Hamburg: Signum Press, pp. 9–40.Google Scholar