Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:52:19.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the nature of verb–noun dissociations in bilectal SLI: A psycholinguistic perspective from Greek

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 2013

MARIA KAMBANAROS
Affiliation:
Cyprus Acquisition Team
KLEANTHES K. GROHMANN*
Affiliation:
Cyprus Acquisition Team & Department of English Studies, University of Cyprus
MICHALIS MICHAELIDES
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Cyprus
ELENI THEODOROU
Affiliation:
Cyprus Acquisition Team & Department of English Studies, University of Cyprus
*
Address for correspondence: Kleanthes K. Grohmann, University of Cyprus, Department of English Studies, 75 Kallipoleos, P.O. Box 20537, 1678 Nicosia, Cypruskleanthi@ucy.ac.cy

Abstract

We report on object and action picture-naming accuracy in two groups of bilectal speakers in Cyprus, children with typical language development (TLD) and children with specific language impairment (SLI). Object names were overall better retrieved than action names by both groups. Given that comprehension for action names was relatively intact for all children, this finding is taken to be the result of a breakdown at the interface of the semantic lexicon and phonological representations, or access to them. The results complement similar research on English, a minimally inflected language in contrast to Greek. Overall, cross-linguistic word class effects provide strong evidence for the hypothesis that grammatical category is an organizing principle shared across languages. Finally, our results suggest that bilectal children with SLI present with general lexical delay rather than a deficit in verb naming per se.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armon-Lotem, S. (2010). Instructive bilingualism: Can bilingual children with SLI rely on one language in learning a second one? Applied Psycholinguistics, 31, 2936.Google Scholar
Aronin, L., & Singleton, D. (2012). Multilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, A. (2002). Linguistic practices in Cyprus and the emergence of Cypriot Standard Greek. San Diego Linguistic Papers 2, 124. [Reprinted in 2010, Mediterranean Language Review, 17, 15–45.]Google Scholar
Bird, H., Howard, D., & Franklin, S. (2003). Verbs and nouns: The importance of being imageable. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16, 113149.Google Scholar
Bishop, D. V. M. (2006). What causes specific language impairment in children? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15, 217221.Google Scholar
Davidoff, J., & Masterson, J. (1996). The development of picture naming: Differences between nouns and verbs. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 9, 213229.Google Scholar
de Bot, K. (2004). The multilingual lexicon: Modeling selection and control. International Journal of Multilingualism, 1, 1732.Google Scholar
Dockrell, J. E., & Lindsay, G. (2008). Inclusion versus specialist provision: Ideology versus evidence based practice for children with language and communication difficulties. In Norbury, C., Tomblin, B. & Bishop, D. V. M. (eds.), Understanding developmental language disorders, pp. 131147. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Durkin, K., & Nugent, B. (1998). Kindergarten children's gender-role expectations for television actors. Sex Roles, 38, 387402.Google Scholar
Elbro, C., Dalby, M., & Maarbjerg, S. (2011). Language-learning impairments: A 30-year follow-up of language-impaired children with and without psychiatric, neurological and cognitive difficulties. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 46, 437448.Google Scholar
Fenson, L., Dale, P., Reznik, S., Bates, E., Thal, D., & Pethick, S. (1994). Variability in early communicative development. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gentner, D. (2006). Why verbs are hard to learn. In Hirsh-Pasek & Golinkoff (eds.), pp. 544–564.Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Boroditsky, L. (2001). On individuation, relativity, and early word learning. In Bowerman, M. & Levinson, S. (eds.), Language acquisition and conceptual development, pp. 257283. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
German, D. J., & Newman, R. S. (2004). The impact of lexical factors on children's word-finding errors. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47, 624636.Google Scholar
Grohmann, K. K. (2011). Some directions for the systematic investigation of the acquisition of Cypriot Greek: A new perspective on production abilities from object clitic placement. In Rinke, E. & Kupisch, T. (eds.), The development of grammar: Language acquisition and diachronic change, pp. 179203. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Grohmann, K. K., & Leivada, E. (2012). Interface ingredients of dialect design: Bi-x, socio-syntax of development, and the grammar of Cypriot Greek. In Di Sciullo, A. M. (ed.), Towards a biolinguistic understanding of grammar: Essays on interfaces, pp. 239262. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Grohmann, K. K., Panagiotidis, P., & Tsiplakou, S. (2006). Properties of wh-question formation in Cypriot Greek. In Janse, M., Joseph, B. D. & Ralli, A. (eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Modern Greek Dialects and Linguistic Theory (Mytilene, Greece: 30 September–3 October 2004), pp. 8398. Patras: University of Patras.Google Scholar
Grohmann, K. K., Theodorou, E., Pavlou, N., Leivada, E., Papadopoulou, E., & Martínez-Ferreiro, S. (2012). The development of object clitic placement in Cypriot Greek and the Romance connection. In Ferré, S., Prévost, P., Tuller, L. & Zebib, R. (eds.), Selected Proceedings of the Romance Turn IV Workshop on the Acquisition of Romance Languages, pp. 128152. Newcastle-upon-Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (eds.) (2006). Action meets word: How children learn verbs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holton, D., Mackridge, P., & Philippaki-Warburton, I. (1997). Greek: A comprehensive grammar of the standard language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Huang, Y. T., & Snedeker, J. (2011). Cascading activation across levels of representation in children's lexical processing. Journal of Child Language, 38, 644661.Google Scholar
Imai, M., Lianjing, L., Haryu, E., Okada, H., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., & Shigematsu, J. (2008). Novel noun and verb learning in Chinese-, English-, and Japanese-speaking children. Child Development, 79, 9791000.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kail, M., & Leonard, L. B. (1986). Word finding abilities in language impaired children. Rockville, MD: American Speech–Language–Hearing Association.Google Scholar
Kambanaros, M. (2003). Verb and noun processing in late bilingual individuals with anomic aphasia. Ph.D. dissertation, Flinders University, Adelaide.Google Scholar
Kambanaros, M. (2013). Does verb type affect action naming in specific language impairment (SLI)? Evidence from instrumentality and name relation. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 26, 160177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kambanaros, M., Georgopoulos, V., Lymberidis, D., & Skoufi, V. (2013). The acquisition of object and action names in typical language development: Evidence from Standard Modern Greek. Ms., Cyprus Acquisition Team & Technological Educational Institute Patras.Google Scholar
Kambanaros, M., & Grohmann, K. K. (2010). Patterns of object and action naming in Cypriot Greek children with SLI and WFDs. In Franich, K., Keil, L., Iserman, K. & Chandlee, J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 34th Boston University Conference on Language Development – Supplement (online publication). http://www.bu.edu/linguistics/BUCLD/supp34.html.Google Scholar
Kambanaros, M., & Grohmann, K. K. (2011). Patterns of naming objects and actions in Cypriot Greek children with SLI and WFDs. In Tsangalides, A. (ed.), Selected Papers from the 19th International Symposium on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics – Thessaloniki, 3–5 April 2009, pp. 232242. Thessaloniki: Monochromia.Google Scholar
Kambanaros, M., & Grohmann, K. K. (2013). More GAPs for action names in children with SLI compared to TD peers?Light evidence from Greek. Ms., Cyprus Acquisition Team & University of Cyprus.Google Scholar
Kambanaros, M., & Grohmann, K. K. (to appear). Profiling (specific) language impairment in bilingual children: Preliminary evidence from Cyprus. In Mueller Gathercole, V. C. (ed.), Bilinguals and assessment: State-of-the-art guide to issues and solutions from around the world. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Kambanaros, M., Grohmann, K. K., & Michaelides, M. (in press). Lexical retrieval for nouns and verbs in typically developing bilectal children. First Language.Google Scholar
Kambanaros, M., Grohmann, K. K., Michaelides, M., & Theodorou, E.Comparing multilingual children with SLI to their bilectal peers: Evidence from object and action picture naming. International Journal of Multilingualism, doi:10.1080/14790718.2012.705846. Published online by Taylor & Francis, 19 July 2012.Google Scholar
Kambanaros, M., Grohmann, K. K., & Theodorou, E. (2010a). Action and object naming in mono- and bilingual children with specific language impairment. In Botinis, A. (ed.), Proceedings of ISCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Experimental Linguistics 2010 – 25–27 August 2010, Athens, Greece, pp. 7376. Athens: ISCA & the University of Athens.Google Scholar
Kambanaros, M., Psahoulia, A., & Mataragka, K. (2010b). Action and object naming in specific language impairment: A pilot study. In Vogindroukas, I., Okalidou, A. & Stavrakaki, S. (eds.), Developmental language disorders: From basic research to clinical practice, pp. 7591. Thessaloniki: Epikentro. [In Greek]Google Scholar
Karpava, S., Grohmann, K. K., & Fokianos, K. (2012). Embedded aspect in L2 and L3 acquisition: Evidence from Russian learners of Greek. In Gabrys-Barker, D. (ed.), Cross-linguistic influences in multilingual language acquisition, pp. 4162. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauschke, C., Lee, H.-W., & Pae, S. (2007). Similarities and variation in noun and verb acquisition: A crosslinguistic study of children learning German, Korean, and Turkish. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22, 128.Google Scholar
Lahey, M., & Edwards, J. (1996). Why do children with specific language impairment name pictures more slowly than peers? Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 30, 10811097.Google Scholar
Lahey, M., & Edwards, J. (1999). Naming errors of children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 42, 195205.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. (2001). Spoken word production: A theory of lexical access. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 98, 1346413471.Google Scholar
Maguire, M. J., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2006). A unified theory of word learning: Putting verb acquisition in context. In Hirsh-Pasek & Golinkoff (eds.), pp. 364–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainela-Arnold, E., Evans, J. L., & Coady, J. A. (2010). Explaining lexical-semantic deficits in specific language impairment: The role of phonological similarity, phonological working memory, and lexical competition. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 53, 17421756.Google Scholar
Masterson, J., Druks, J., & Gallienne, D. (2008). Object and action picture naming in three- and five-year-old children. Journal of Child Language, 35, 373402.Google Scholar
McDonough, C., Song, L., Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R. M., & Lannon, R. (2011). An image is worth a thousand words: Why nouns tend to dominate verbs in early word learning. Developmental Science, 14, 181189.Google Scholar
Meisel, J. M. (1989). Early differentiation of languages in bilingual children. In Hyltenstam, K. & Obler, L. (eds.), Bilingualism across the lifespan: Aspects of acquisition, maturity, and loss, pp. 1340. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newton, B. (1972). Cypriot Greek: Its phonology and inflections. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Panhellenic Association of Logopedists (1995). Assessment of phonetic and phonological development. Athens: PAL.Google Scholar
Papaeliou, C. F., & Rescorla, L. A. (2011). Vocabulary development in Greek children: A cross-linguistic comparison using the Language Development Survey. Journal of Child Language, 38, 861887.Google Scholar
Paradis, J. (2007). Bilingual children with specific language impairment: Theoretical and applied issues. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28, 551564.Google Scholar
Paraskevopoulos, J., Kalantzi-Azizi, A., & Gianitsas, N. (1999). “Athina” test for diagnosis of learning disabilities. Athens: Ellinika Grammata. [In Greek]Google Scholar
Ralli, A. (2003). Morphology in Greek linguistics: The state of the art. Journal of Greek Linguistics, 4, 77129.Google Scholar
Raven, J., Raven, J. C., & Court, J. H. (2000). Manual for Raven's progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. (1997). The Renfrew language scales (4th edn.). Milton Keynes: Speechmark.Google Scholar
Rice, M. L. (2003). A unified model of specific and general language delay: Grammatical tense as a clinical marker of unexpected variation. In Levy, Y. & Schaeffer, J. (eds.), Language competence across populations: Toward a definition of specific language impairment, pp. 6394. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rossion, B., & Pourtois, C. (2004). Revisiting Snodgrass & Vanderwart's object pictorial set: The role of surface detail in basic-level object recognition. Perception, 33, 217236.Google Scholar
Rowe, C., & Grohmann, K. K. (2013). Discrete bilectalism: Towards co-overt prestige and diglossic shift in Cyprus. Ms., University of Cyprus.Google Scholar
Sheng, L., & McGregor, K. K. (2010). Object and action naming in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 53, 17041719.Google Scholar
Siegel, J. (2010). Second dialect acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simos, P. G., Kasselimis, D., & Mouzaki, A. (2011). Age, gender, and education effects on vocabulary measures in Greek. Aphasiology, 25, 475491.Google Scholar
Stavrakaki, S. (2000). Verb lexicons in SLI: Some experimental data from Standard Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics, 1, 95131.Google Scholar
Stavrakaki, S., & Tsimpli, I. M. (2000). Diagnostic verbal IQ test for Greek preschool and school age children: Standardization, statistical analysis, psychometric properties. Proceedings of the 8th Conference on Speech Therapy, pp. 95106. Athens: Ellinika Grammata. [In Greek]Google Scholar
Stephany, U. (1997). The acquisition of Greek. In Slobin, D. I. (ed.), The crosslinguistic study of language acquisition (vol. 4), pp. 183334. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Terkourafi, M. (2004). The Cypriot koine: A recent development? In Catsimali, G., Kalokairinos, A., Anagnostopoulou, E. & Kappa, I. (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Greek Linguistics. Rethymno: Linguistics Lab e-book.Google Scholar
Terzi, A. (1999). Cypriot Greek clitics and their positioning restrictions. In Alexiadou, A., Horrocks, G. & Stavrou, M. (eds.), Studies in Greek syntax, pp. 227240. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tsybina, I., & Eriks-Brophy, A. (2010). Bilingual dialogic book-reading intervention for preschoolers with slow expressive vocabulary development. Journal of Communication Disorders, 43, 538556.Google Scholar
Vogindroukas, I., Protopapas, A., & Sideris, G. (2009). Word-finding test. Chania: Glafki.Google Scholar