Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T05:44:12.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The predictors of foreign-accentedness in the home language of Polish–English bilingual children

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 March 2018

MAGDALENA WREMBEL Open the ORCID record for MAGDALENA WREMBEL [Opens in a new window] ,
MARTA MARECKA Open the ORCID record for MARTA MARECKA [Opens in a new window] ,
JAKUB SZEWCZYK Open the ORCID record for JAKUB SZEWCZYK [Opens in a new window]  and
AGNIESZKA OTWINOWSKA
MAGDALENA WREMBEL*
Affiliation:
Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań, Poland
MARTA MARECKA
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
JAKUB SZEWCZYK
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Kraków, Poland
AGNIESZKA OTWINOWSKA
Affiliation:
Institute of English Studies, University of Warsaw, Poland
*
Address for correspondence: Magdalena Wrembel, Faculty of English, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań, al. Niepodległości 4, 61–874 Poznań, Polandmagdala@wa.amu.edu.pl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We investigated the speech patterns and accentedness of Polish–English bilingual children raised in Great Britain to verify whether their L1 Polish would be perceived as different from that of monolinguals matched for age and socioeconomic status. To this end, Polish-language speech samples of 32 bilinguals and 10 monolinguals (a 3:1 ratio, MAge = 5.79) were phonetically analysed by trained phoneticians and rated by 55 Polish raters, who assessed the degree of native accent, intelligibility, acceptability and perceived age. The results show significant differences in the phonetic performance of bilingual and monolingual children – both in terms of atypical speech patterns uncovered in the phonetic analysis and in terms of the holistic accentedness ratings. We also explored the socio-linguistic predictors of accent ratings in bilingual speech and found that the amount of L1 Polish input was the main predictor of accentedness in children's L1 Polish speech, while L2 English input was marginally significant. (149)

Keywords

foreign accentbilingual childrenaccentedness ratingsspeech patternscross-linguistic influence
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , March 2019 , pp. 383 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*The data for this paper come from the Bi-SLI-Poland project Cognitive and language development of Polish bilingual children at the school entrance age – risks and opportunities conducted within the European COST Action IS0804 and carried out at the Faculty of Psychology, University of Warsaw, Poland in collaboration with Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University, Poland. The project was supported by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education /National Science Centre (Decision 809/N-COST/2010/0). Data collection and coding were also partly supported by Foundation for Polish Science subsidy to Zofia Wodniecka.

The current project was supported by the Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education grant (Decision 0094/NPRH3/H12/82/2014) Phonological and Morpho-syntactic Features of Language and Discourse of Polish Children Raised Bilingually in Migrant Communities in Great Britain carried out at the Faculty of Modern Languages, University of Warsaw, Poland. The project was related to the European COST Action IS1306.

Supplementary material can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918000044

References

Audacity Team (2016) Audacity®. Version 2.1.2. Available from: http://audacityteam.org/Google Scholar
Anderson-Hsieh, J., & Koehler, K. (1988). The effect of foreign accent and speaking rate on native speaker comprehension. Language Learning, 38, 561–613.Google Scholar
Asher, J. J., & Garcia, R. (1969). The optimal age to learn a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal, 53, 334–341.Google Scholar
Banasik, N., Haman, E., & Smoczyńska, M. (2012). Sentence Repetition Task. Unpublished material, University of Warsaw.Google Scholar
Barlow, J. A. (2014). Age of acquisition and allophony in Spanish–English bilinguals. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 288.Google Scholar
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68 (3), 255–278.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67 (1), 1–48.Google Scholar
Bates, D., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., & Baayen, H. (2015). Parsimonious Mixed Models. ArXiv:1506.04967 [Stat]. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.04967Google Scholar
Bongaerts, T., van Summeren, C., Planken, B., & Schils, E. (1997). Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 447–465.Google Scholar
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A. (2014). Gimson's Pronunciation of English (8th edition). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A Dynamic Systems Theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 7–21.Google Scholar
de Leeuw, E. (2009). When your native language sounds foreign: A phonetic investigation into first language attrition. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
de Leeuw, E., Schmid, M., & Mennen, I. (2010). The effects of contact on native language pronunciation in an L2 migrant setting. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 33–40.Google Scholar
de Mareüil, P. B., & Vieru-Dimulescu, B. (2006). The Contribution of Prosody to the Perception of Foreign Accent. Phonetica, 63 (4), 247–267.Google Scholar
Dubisz, S. (2013). Integracja językowa w dziejach polszczyzny. Poznańskie Studia Polonistyczne. Seria Językoznawcza, 20, 85–97.Google Scholar
Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K., & Walczak, B. (2011). Polish. In: Delcourt, C.; van Sterkenburg, P. (eds.) The languages of the 27. Bruxelles: Fondation universitaire de Belgique, 817–840.Google Scholar
Elliott, A. R. (1995). Field independence/dependence, hemispheric specialization, and attitude in relation to pronunciation accuracy in Spanish as a foreign language. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 351–371.Google Scholar
En, L. G. W., Brebner, C., & McCormack, P. (2014). A preliminary report on the English phonology of typically developing English-Mandarin bilingual preschool Singaporean children. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 49, 317–332.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1988). Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in English sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 70–79.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second-language Speech Learning: Theory, Findings, and Problems. In Strange, W. (ed.) Speech Perception and Linguistic Experience: Issues in Cross-language research, pp. 229–273. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (2002). Interactions between the native and second-language phonetic systems. In Burmeister, P., Piske, T., & Rhode, A. (eds.), An Integrated View of Language Development Papers in Honor of Henning Wode, pp. 217–244. Trier: Wissenshaftlicher Verlag.Google Scholar
Flege, J.E., & Fletcher, K. L. (1992). Talker and listener effects on degree of perceived foreign accent. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 370–389.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., & MacKay, I. R. A. (2011). What accounts for “age” effects on overall degree of foreign accent? In Wrembel, M., Kul, M. and Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K., (eds.) Achievements and perspectives in the acquisition of second language speech: New Sounds 2010, pp. 65–82, Vol. 2. Bern, Switzerland: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E., Munro, M. J., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1995). Factors affecting strength of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3125–3134.Google Scholar
Gallardo del Puerto, F., Gómez Lacabex, E., & García Lecumberri, M. L. (2007). The assessment of foreign accent by native and non-native judges. PTLC Proceedings, London, CD-ROM.Google Scholar
Genesee, F., & Nicoladis, E. (2009). Bilingual first language acquisition. In: Hoff, E., Shatz, M. (eds) Blackwell Handbook of Language Development, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 324–342.Google Scholar
Grzymała-Moszczyńska, H., Grzymała-Moszczyńska, J., Durlik, J., & Szydłowska, P. (2015). (Nie)łatwe powroty do domu? Funkcjonowanie dzieci i młodzieży powracających z emigracji. Warsaw, Poland: Fundacja Centrum im. prof. Bronisława Geremka.Google Scholar
Guion, S. G., Flege, J. E., & Loftin, J. D. (2000). The effect of L1 use on pronunciation in Quichua-Spanish bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics, 28, 27–42.Google Scholar
Haman, E., Wodniecka, Z., Marecka, M., Szewczyk, J., Białecka-Pikul, M., Otwinowska, A., Mieszkowska, K., Łuniewska, M., Kołak, J., Miękisz, A., Kacprzak, A., Banasik, N., & Foryś-Nogala, M. (under review). How does L1 and L2 exposure impact L1 performance in bilingual children? Evidence from Polish–English migrants to the UK. Frontiers in Psychology.Google Scholar
Hayes, A. F., & Krippendorff, K. (2007). Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data. Communication Methods and Measures, 1, 77–89.Google Scholar
Herdina, P., & Jessner, U. (2002). A Dynamic Model of Multilingualism: Perspectives of Change in Psycholinguistics. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd.Google Scholar
Holm, A., & Dodd, B. (1999). A longitudinal study of the phonological development of two Cantonese–English bilingual children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 20, 349–376.Google Scholar
Hopp, H., & Schmid, M.S. (2013). Perceived foreign accent in first language attrition and second language acquisition: The impact of age of acquisition and bilingualism. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 361–394.Google Scholar
Jahr, E. H., & Janicki, K. (2009). The function of the Standard variety: a contrastive study of Norwegian and Polish. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 115, 25–45.Google Scholar
Jassem, W. (2003). Polish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 33, 103–108.Google Scholar
Jesney, K. (2004). The use of global foreign accent rating in studies of L2 acquisition. Calgary, AB: Language Research Centre, University of Calgary.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. E., & Wilson, I. L. (2002). Phonetic evidence for early language differentiation: Research issues and some preliminary data. International Journal of Bilingualism, 6, 271–289.Google Scholar
Karaś, H. (ed.) (2008). Gwary polskie. Przewodnik multimedialny. (2008). http://www.gwarypolskie.uw.edu.plGoogle Scholar
Karpowicz, T. (2009). Kultura Języka Polskiego: wymowa, ortografia, interpunkcja. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.Google Scholar
Kiebzak-Mandera, D., Otwinowska, A., & Białecka-Pikul, M. (2012). MAIN Multilingual Assessment Instrument for Narratives: Polish Version. In: Gagarina, N., Klop, D., Kunnari, S., Tantele, K., Välimaa, T., Balciuniene, I., Bohnacker, U., & Walters, J.. (eds.), ZAS Papers in Linguistics 56.Google Scholar
Kurkowska, H. (1981). Próba charakterystyki socjolingwistycznej współczesnego języka polskiego. In Kurkowska, H. (Ed.): Współczesna polszczyzna. Wybór zagadnień;. Warszawa, 30–31.Google Scholar
Kuś, K., Otwinowska, A. Banasik, N., & Kiebzak-Mandera, D. (2012). Kwestionariusz Rozwoju Językowego (Language Development Questionnaire). University of Warsaw, unpublished material.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2015). lmerTest. R package version 2.0.Google Scholar
Lee, J. K. (2014). The role of prosody in the perception of foreign accent and comprehensibility: prosody-corrected-L2 speech vs. prosody-distorted-L1 speech. Korean Journal of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Liu, X., & Lee, J.-K. (2012). The Contribution of Prosody to the Foreign Accent of Chinese Talkers‘ English Speech. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 4 (3), 59–73.Google Scholar
Marecka, M., Wrembel, M., Zembrzuski, D., & Otwinowska-Kasztelanic, A. (2015). Do early bilinguals speak differently than their monolingual peers? Predictors of phonological performance of Polish–English bilingual children. In E. Babatsouli & D. Ingram (eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Monolingual and Bilingual Speech 2015.Google Scholar
Mayr, R., Howells, G., & Lewis, R. (2014). Asymmetries in phonological development: the case of word-final cluster acquisition in Welsh-English bilingual children. Journal of Child Language, 42, 146–179.Google Scholar
Meador, D., Flege, J., & MacKay, I. (2000). Factors affecting the recognition of words in a second language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3, 55–67.Google Scholar
Moyer, A. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology: The critical factors of age, motivation, and instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 81–108.Google Scholar
Oyama, S. (1976). A sensitive period for the acquisition of a non-native phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 261–285.Google Scholar
Piske, T., MacKay, I.R.A., & Flege, J. E. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accent in an L2. A review. Journal of Phonetics 29, 191–215.Google Scholar
Purcell, E., & Suter, R. (1980). Predictors of pronunciation accuracy: A reexamination. Language Learning, 30, 271–287.Google Scholar
Roach, P. (2009). English Phonetics and Phonology (4th edition). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S. (2013). First language attrition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 4, 117–123.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S., & Dusseldorp, E. (2010). Quantitative analyses in a multivariate study of language attrition: The impact of extralinguistic factors. Second Language Research, 26, 125–160.Google Scholar
Schmid, M. S., & Hopp, H. (2014). Comparing foreign accent in L1 attrition and L2 acquisition: Range and rater effects. Language Testing, 31, 367–388.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E., & Hoefnagel-Hohle, M. (1977). Age differences in the pronunciation of foreign sounds. Language and Speech, 20, 357–365.Google Scholar
Southwood, M. H., & Flege, J. E. (1999). Scaling foreign accent: direct magnitude estimation versus interval scaling. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 13, 335–349.Google Scholar
Suter, R. (1976); Predictors of pronunciation accuracy in second language learning, Language Learning, 26, 233–253.Google Scholar
Thompson, I. (1991). Foreign accents revisited: The English pronunciation of Russian immigrants. Language Learning, 41, 177–204.Google Scholar
Tuller, L. (2015). Clinical Use of Parental Questionnaires in Multilingual Contexts. In: Armon-Lotem, S., De Jong, J. and Meir, N. (eds.), Assessing multilingual children: Disentangling bilingualism from language impairment pp. 301–330. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Wilkoń, A. (2000). Typologia odmian językowych współczesnej polszczyzny. Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.Google Scholar
Wrembel, M. (2015). In search of a new perspective: Cross-linguistic influence in the acquisition of third language phonology. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.Google Scholar
Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Flege, J. E., & Liu, S. (2000). Pronunciation proficiency in the first and second languages of Korean-English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 3, 131–149.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Wrembel et al. supplementary material

Wrembel et al. supplementary material 1

Download Wrembel et al. supplementary material(File)
File 14.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Wrembel et al. supplementary material

Wrembel et al. supplementary material 2

Download Wrembel et al. supplementary material(File)
File 6.4 KB
Supplementary material: File

Wrembel et al. supplementary material

Wrembel et al. supplementary material 3

Download Wrembel et al. supplementary material(File)
File 516.4 KB