Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:23:02.730Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Scrutinizing the role of length of residence and age of acquisition in the interlanguage pronunciation development of English /ɹ/ by late Japanese bilinguals*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2013

KAZUYA SAITO  and
FRANÇOIS-XAVIER BRAJOT
KAZUYA SAITO*
Affiliation:
Waseda University
FRANÇOIS-XAVIER BRAJOT
Affiliation:
McGill University
*
Address for correspondence: Kazuya Saito, School of Commerce, Waseda University, 1–6-1, Nishi Waseda, Shinjuku, Tokyo 169–8050, Japankazuya.saito@waseda.jp
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The current project examined whether and to what degree continued L2 input, operationalized as length of residence (LOR), and age of acquisition (AOA), defined as the first intensive exposure to the target language, can be predictive of adult Japanese learners’ production of word-initial English /ɹ/. Data were collected from 65 participants, consisting of three groups of Japanese learners of English (n = 13 for Short-, Mid-, and Long-LOR groups, respectively) and two groups of baseline speakers (n = 13 for Japanese- and English-Baseline groups, respectively). Their production of /ɹ/ was elicited via three oral tasks (i.e., word reading, sentence reading, timed picture description). Acoustic analyses were carried out along four dimensions: third formant (F3), second formant (F2), first formant (F1) frequencies, and formant transition duration. The results demonstrated that (a) all learners reached native-like proficiency with respect to the use of existing cues (F2, transition duration) within approximately one year of LOR, (b) their performance was negatively related to AOA to some degree, and (c) longer LOR was predictive of the development of the new cue (F3). These results suggest that late L2 speech sound acquisition and proficiency may be characterized by different levels of phonetic processing.

Keywords

second language pronunciationlate bilingualismexperience effectsage effectsEnglish /ɹ/
Type
Research Article
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , October 2013 , pp. 847 - 863
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

This study was funded by the Government of Canada Post-Doctoral Research Fellowship awarded to the first author. We would like to thank Murray Munro and anonymous Bilingualism: Language and Cognition reviewers for their useful and constructive comments on the earlier versions of the manuscript.

References

Abrahamsson, N. (2012). Age of onset and nativelike L2 ultimate attainment of morphosyntactic and phonetic intuition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abrahamsson, N., & Hyltenstam, K. (2008). The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30, 481–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, W. (2010). Effects of age and experience on the production of English word-final stops by Korean speakers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 13, 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, W., Trofimovich, P., Flege, J. E., Mack, M., & Halter, R. (2008). Child–adult differences in second-language phonological learning: The role of cross-language similarity. Language and Speech, 51, 316–341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Best, C., & Tyler, M. (2007). Nonnative and second-language speech perception. In Bohn, O. & Munro, M. (eds.), Language experience in second language speech learning: In honour of James Emil Flege, pp. 13–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bialystok, E. (1997). The structure of age: In search of barriers to second language acquisition. Second Language Research, 13, 116–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsong, D. (2005). Interpreting age effects in second language acquisition. In Kroll & de Groot (eds.), pp. 109–127.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. (2006). Age and second language acquisition and processing: A selective overview. Language Learning, 56, 9–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P., & Pater, J. (2007). Constructing constraints from language data: The case of Canadian English diphthongs. Handout, 38th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS 38), Ottowa. http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/paul/presentations/CanadianRaisingNELS2007.pdf (retrieved December 2, 2012).Google Scholar
Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2011). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. http://www.praat.org (retrieved September 1, 2011).Google Scholar
Bongaerts, T., Van Summeren, C., Planken, B., & Schils, E. (1997). Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 447–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bundgaard-Nilsen, R., Best, C., & Tyler, M. (2011). Vocabulary size is associated with second-language vowel perception performance in adult learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 33, 433–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cebrian, J. (2006). Experience and the use of non-native duration in L2 vowel categorization. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 372–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobb, T. (2011). The complete lexical tutor. http://www.lextutor.ca/vp/ (retrieved September 1, 2011).Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 499–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In Long, M. & Doughty, C. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition, pp. 313–348. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R., & Larson-Hall, J. (2005). What does the critical period really mean? In Kroll & de Groot (eds.), pp. 88–108.Google Scholar
Delattre, P., & Freeman, D. (1968). A dialect study of American r's by x-ray motion picture. Linguistics, 44, 29–68.Google Scholar
Derwing, T., & Munro, M. (2005). Second language accent and pronunciation teaching: A research-based approach. TESOL Quarterly, 39, 379–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derwing, T., & Munro, M. (in press). The development of L2 oral language skills in two L1 groups: A seven-year study. Language Learning.Google Scholar
Dickerson, L., & Dickerson, W. (1977). Interlanguage phonology: Current research and future directions. The notions of simplification, interlanguages, and pidgins, and their relation to second language pedagogy. Actes du 5ième Colloque de Linguistique Appliquée de Neuchatel, pp. 18–30. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (2005). Measuring implicit and explicit knowledge of a Second Language: A psychometric study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 141–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espy-Wilson, C. Y. (1992). Acoustic measures for linguistic features distinguishing the semivowels /w j r l/ in American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92, 736–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Espy-Wilson, C. Y., Boyce, S. E., Jackson, M., Narayanan, S., & Alwan, A. (2000). Acoustic modeling of American English /ɹ/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108, 343–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J. (1988) Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in English sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 70–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J. (1995). Second language speech learning. In Strange (ed.), pp. 233–277.Google Scholar
Flege, J. (2003). Assessing constraints on second-language segmental production and perception. In Meyer, A. & Schiller, N. (eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities, pp. 319–355. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. (2009). Give input a chance! In Piske, T. & Young-Scholten, M. (eds.), Input matters in SLA, pp. 175–190. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Flege, J., Birdsong, D., Bialystok, E., Mack, M., Sung, H., & Tsukada, K. (2006). Degree of foreign accent in English sentences produced by Korean children and adults. Journal of Phonetics, 34, 153–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J., Bohn, O-S., & Jang, S. (1997). The effect of experience on nonnative subjects’ production and perception of English vowels. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 437–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J., & Fletcher, K. (1992). Talker and listener effects on the perception of degree of foreign accent. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 370–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J., & Liu, S. (2001). The effect of experience on adults’ acquisition of a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 527–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J., & MacKay, I. [R. A.] (2004). Perceiving vowels in a second language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J., Munro, M., & Fox, A. (1994). Auditory and categorical effects on cross-language vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95, 3623–3641.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J., Munro, M., & MacKay, I. R. A. (1995a). Factors affecting degree of perceived foreign accent in a second language. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 3125–3134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J., Takagi, N., & Mann, V. (1995b). Japanese adults learn to produce English /ɹ/ and /l/ accurately. Language and Speech, 38, 25–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Flege, J., Yeni-Komshian, G., & Liu, S. (1999). Age constraints on second language acquisition. Journal of Memory & Language, 41, 78–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatbonton, E., & Trofimovich, P. (2008). The ethnic group affiliation and L2 proficiency link: Empirical evidence. Language Awareness, 17, 229–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottfried, T. L., & Suiter, T. L. (1997). Effect of linguistic experience on the identification of Mandarin tones. Journal of Phonetics, 25, 207–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guion, S., Flege, J., Ahahane‐Yamada, R., & Pruitt, J. C. (2000). An investigation of current models of second language speech perception: The case of Japanese adults’ perception of English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 107, 2711–2725.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hakuta, K., Bialystok, E., & Wiley, E. (2003). Critical evidence: A test of the critical-period hypothesis for second-language acquisition. Psychological Science, 14, 31–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hattori, K., & Iverson, P. (2009). English /r/–/l/ category assimilation by Japanese adults: Individual differences and the link to identification accuracy. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125, 469–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioup, G., Boustagi, E., El Tigi, M., & Moselle, M. (1994). Reexamining the Critical Period Hypothesis: A case study of successful adult SLA in a naturalistic environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 73–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iverson, P., Kuhl, P., Akahane-Yamada, R., Diesch, E., Tohkura, Y., Kettermann, A., & Siebert, C. (2003). A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non-native phonemes. Cognition, 87, 847–857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Iverson, P., Hazan, V., & Bannister, K. (2005). Phonetic training with acoustic cue manipulations: A comparison of methods for teaching English /ɹ/–/l/ to Japanese adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118, 3267–3278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, G., & Aaronson, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of Chinese children and adolescents learning English in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 131–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, J., & Newport, E. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of ESL. Cognitive Psychology, 21, 60–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroll, J. F., & de Groot, A. M. B. (eds.) (2005). Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Labov, W., Ash, S., & Boberg, C. (2006). The Atlas of North American English: Phonetics, phonology, and sound change. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson-Hall, J. (2006). What does more time buy you? Another look at the effects of long-term residence on production accuracy of English /ɹ/ and /l/ by Japanese speakers. Language and Speech, 49, 521–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, B., Guion, S. G., & Harada, T. (2006). Acoustic analysis of the production of unstressed English vowels by early and late Korean and Japanese bilinguals. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 487–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Y. (2003). Interphonology variability: Sociolinguistic factors affecting L2 simplification strategies. Applied Linguistics, 24, 439–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lotto, A. J., Sato, M., & Diehl, R. L. (2004). Mapping the task for the second language learner: The case of Japanese acquisition of /ɹ/ and /l/. In Slifka, J., Manuel, S. & Matthies, M. (eds.), From sound to sense: 50+ years of discoveries in speech communication, pp. C381–386. http://www.rle.mit.edu/soundtosense/conference/pdfs/fulltext/Saturday%20Posters/SB-Lotto-STS.pdf [Online conference proceedings]Google Scholar
Major, R. (2008). Transfer in second language phonology: A review. In Hansen Edwards, J. & Zampini, M. (eds.), Phonology and second language acquisition, pp. 63–94. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAllister, R., Flege, J., & Piske, T. (2002). The influence of L1 on the acquisition of Swedish quantity by native speakers of Spanish, English and Estonian. Journal of Phonetics, 30, 229–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moyer, A. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 phonology: The critical factors of age, motivation, and instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munro, M. (1993). Productions of English vowels by native speakers of Arabic: Acoustic measurements and accentedness ratings. Language and Speech, 36, 39–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munro, M., & Derwing, T. (2008). Segmental acquisition in adult ESL learners: A longitudinal study of vowel production. Language Learning, 58, 479–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patkowski, M. (1990). Age and accent in a second language: A reply to James Emil Flege. Applied Linguistics, 11, 73–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piske, T., Flege, J., MacKay, I. [R. A.], & Meador, D. (2011). Investigating native and non-native vowels produced in conversational speech. In Wrembel, M., Kul, M. & Dziubalska-Kołaczyk, K. (eds.), Achievements and perspectives in the acquisition of second language speech: New Sounds 2010, pp. 195–205. Switzerland: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Piske, T., MacKay, I. [R. A.], & Flege, J. (2001). Factors affecting degree of foreign accents in an L2: A review. Journal of Phonetics, 29, 191–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purcell, E. T., & Suter, R. W. (1980). Predictors of pronunciation accuracy: A reexamination. Language Learning, 30, 271–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rau, D., Chang, A., & Tarone, E. (2009). Think or sink: Chinese learners’ acquisition of the voiceless interdental fricative. Language Learning, 59, 581–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schroeder, M. R., Atal, B. S., & Hall, J. L. (1979). Optimizing digital speech coders by exploiting masking properties of the human ear. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66, 1647–1652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scovel, T. (2000). A critical review of the critical period research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 20, 213–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Segalowitz, N. (2003) Automaticity and second languages. In Doughty, C. & Long, M. (eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition, pp. 382–408. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spada, N., & Tomita, Y. (2010). Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 263–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, G. (1999). Age at immigration and second language proficiency among foreign-born adults. Language in Society, 28, 555–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strange, W. (ed.) (1988). Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research. Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, I. (1991). Foreign accents revisited: The English pronunciation of Russian immigrants. Language Learning, 41, 177–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W. (2006). Learning second-language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ullman, M. T. (2004). Contributions of memory circuits to language: The declarative/procedural model. Cognition, 92, 231–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Underbakke, M., Polka, L., Gottfried, T. L., & Strange, W. (1988). Trading relations in the perception of /ɹ/ and /l/ by Japanese learners of English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 84, 90–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamada, R. A. (1995). Age and acquisition of second language speech sounds: Perception of American English /p/ and /l/ by native speakers of Japanese. In Strange (ed.), pp. 305–320.Google Scholar
Yang, B. (1996). A comparative study of American English and Korean vowels produced by male and female speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 24, 245–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, X., Espy-Wilson, C., Boyce, S., Tiede, M., Holland, C., & Choe, A. (2008). A magnetic resonance imaging-based articulatory and acoustic study of “retroflex” and “bunched” American English /ɹ/. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123, 4466–4481.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed