Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:20:58.099Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transmission, acquisition, parameter-setting, reanalysis, and language change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2011

SALIKOKO S. MUFWENE
SALIKOKO S. MUFWENE*
Affiliation:
University of Chicago, Department of Linguistics, 1010 E. 59th Street, Chicago, IL 60637, USAs-mufwene@uchicago.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Jürgen Meisel's (JM) article is literally thought-provoking, especially for the issues that one can raise out of the central position that he develops, viz., “although bilingual acquisition in situations of language contact can be argued to be of significant importance for explanations of grammatical change, reanalysis affecting parameter settings is much less likely to happen than is commonly assumed in historical linguistics” (p. 142). This is a position that calls for grounding language change, hence historical linguistics, in the pragmatics/ethnography of language practice, a question that linguists can continue to ignore no more than the actuation question (Weinreich, Labov & Herzog, 1968; McMahon, 1994; Labov, 2001; Mufwene, 2008). The latter regards what particular ethnographic factors trigger particular changes at particular places and at particular times but not at others. In other words, do structural changes happen simply because they must happen or because particular agents are involved at specific times under specific ecological conditions of language practice?

Type
Peer Commentaries
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , April 2011 , pp. 152 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andersen, H. (1973). Abductive and deductive change. Language, 49, 765–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeGraff, M. (1999). Creolization, language change, and language acquisition: A prolegomenon. In DeGraff, M. (ed.), Language creation and language change: Creolization, diachrony, and development, pp. 1–46. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hickey, R. (ed.) (2003). Motives for language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Labov, W. (2001). Principles of linguistic change: Social factors. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lee, N., Mikesell, L., Joaquin, A. D. L., Mates, A. W., & Schumann, J. H. (2009) The interactional instinct: The evolution and acquisition of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, D. (1997). Catastrophic change and learning theory. Lingua, 100, 171–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, D. (2006). How new languages emerge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, P. (2003). On change in ‘E-language’. In Hickey (ed.), pp. 7–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCawley, J. D. (1976). Some ideas not to live by. Die neueren Sprachen, 75, 151–165.Google Scholar
McMahon, A. (1994). Understanding language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, S. S. (1989). Equivocal structures in some Gullah complex sentences. American Speech, 64, 304–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, S. S. (2001). The ecology of language evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, S. S. (2003). Genetic linguistics and genetic creolistics: A response to Sarah G. Thomason's “Creoles and Genetic Relationships”. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages, 18, 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, S. S. (2008). Language evolution: Contact, competition and change. London: Continuum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mufwene, S. S. (2010). Second language acquisition and the emergence of creoles. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmeyer, F. J. (2003). Formal and functional motivation for language change. In Hickey (ed.), pp. 18–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, H. (1880). Prinzipien der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Paul, H. (1891). Principles of the history of language. Translated from the second edition of the original by Strong, H. A.. London: Longmans, Green, and Co.Google Scholar
Rizzi, L. (1992). Reanalysis rules. In Bright, W. (ed.), International encyclopedia of linguistics (vol. 3), pp. 318–320. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weinreich, U., Labov, W., & Herzog, M. I. (1968). Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Lehman, W. P. & Malkiel, Y. (eds.), Directions for historical linguistics: A symposium, pp. 97–195. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar