Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:19:34.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The untouchables

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2016

ANA T. PÉREZ-LEROUX
ANA T. PÉREZ-LEROUX*
Affiliation:
University of Toronto
*
Address for correspondence: Professor Ana T. Pérez-Leroux, Director, Cognitive Science Program, University of Toronto, University College, room F201, 15 King's College Circle, Toronto ON M5S 3H7, Canadaat.perez.leroux@utoronto.ca
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Carroll's critique (Carroll) of the field of bilingualism yields strong directives. Let us not study specific groups of bilinguals, and make big claims about bilingual learning. Let us not study one domain, say vocabulary, and generalize to bilinguals’ language. These are all valid points. She also voices strong skepticism about how current literature deals with language experience:

“Much of the bilingual exposure literature making claims about quantity or quality of exposure is little more than speculation, built from a ‘logic’ about amounts of exposure that will not bear close scrutiny.” (8)

Type
Peer Commentaries
Information
Bilingualism: Language and Cognition , Volume 20 , Issue 1 , January 2017 , pp. 31 - 32
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Carroll, S.E. (2015) Exposure and input in bilingual development. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. doi:10.1017/S1366728915000863.Google Scholar
Castilla-Earls, A. P., Restrepo, M. A., Pérez-Leroux, A.T., Gray, S., Holmes, P., Gail, D. & Chen, Z. (To appear). Interactions between bilingual effects and Language Impairment: Exploring grammatical markers in Spanish-Speaking bilingual children. Applied Psycholinguistics. Published online November 2015. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716415000521 Google Scholar
Castilla, A. P., Restrepo, M. A., & Pérez-Leroux, A. T. (2009). Individual differences and the developmental interdependence hypothesis. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 12 (1), 1–16.Google Scholar
Hurtado, N., Gruter, T., Marchman, V. A., & Fernald, A. (2014). Relative Language Exposure, Processing Efficiency and Vocabulary in Spanish-English Bilingual Toddlers. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 17 (1), 189–202.Google Scholar
Jia, G., & Aaronson, D. (2003). A longitudinal study of Chinese children and adolescents learning English in the United States. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24 (01), 131–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jia, G., Aaronson, D., & Wu, Y. (2002). Long-term language attainment of bilingual immigrants: Predictive variables and language group differences. Applied Psycholinguistics, 23 (04), 599–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, N. (2003). (In) vulnerable domains in multilingualism (Vol. 1). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, B., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2004). Verbal and nonverbal predictors of early language problems: An analysis of twins in early childhood back to infancy. Journal of Child Language, 31 (03), 609–631.Google Scholar
Pérez-Leroux, A. T., Cuza, A., & Thomas, D. (2011). Input and parental attitudes: A look at Spanish-English bilingual development in Toronto. In Potowski, K. (ed.) Bilingual youth: Spanish in English-speaking societies, 149–175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Phillips, C., & Ehrenhofer, L. (2015). The role of language processing in language acquisition. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 5 (4), 409–453.Google Scholar