Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:56:25.812Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The evolution of fitness in life-history theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2000

JON E. BROMMER
Affiliation:
Department of Ecology and Systematics, Division of Population Biology, PO Box 17 (Arkadiankatu 7), FIN – 00014, University of Helsinki, Finland (Tel: +358 – 9 – 191 7397; Fax: +358 – 9 – 191 7492; E-mail: jon.brommer@helsinki.fi)
Get access

Abstract

Theory concerning the evolution of life history (the schedule of reproduction and survival) focuses on describing the life history which maximises fitness. Although there is an intuitive link between life history and fitness, there are in fact several measures of the ‘black box’ concept of fitness. There has been a debate in the bio-mathematical literature on the predictive difference between the two most commonly used measures; intrinsic rate of increase r and net reproductive ratio R0. Although both measures aim to describe fitness, models using one of the measures may predict the opposite of similar models using the other measure, which is clearly undesirable. Here, I review the evolution of these fitness measures over the last four decades, the predictive differences between these measures and the resulting shift of the fitness concept. I focus in particular on some recent developments, which have solved the dilemma of predictive differences between these fitness measures by explicitly acknowledging the game-theoretical nature of life-history evolution.

Type
Review Article
Copyright
Cambridge Philosophical Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)