Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:05:24.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Global Pharmaceutical Markets and Corporate Citizenship: The Case of Novartis’ Anti-cancer Drug Glivec

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2008

Stefan Ecks
Stefan Ecks
Affiliation:
School of Social and Political Studies, University of Edinburgh, Adam Ferguson Building, George Square, Edinburgh EH8 9LLUK E-mail: stefan.ecks@ed.ac.uk
Get access

Abstract

This paper analyses a remarkable transformation of global capitalism in recent years: that corporations claim to be ‘good citizens’ and are driven by higher aspirations than profits alone. It focuses on the lawsuit brought by the drug company Novartis against the Indian government over the patent for the anti-cancer drug Glivec. Novartis’ attack on Indian patent law caused an international outcry. Opponents of Novartis argued that the company was trying to destroy essential provisions in the Indian law that keep drugs affordable even after the country signed up to the World Trade Organization's agreement on Trade-Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). With reference to ‘the constitutional obligation of providing good health care to its citizens’, the High Court in Chennai, India, dismissed Novartis’ challenge in August 2007. While health activists celebrated the court's decision as a victory for anti-corporate citizens, this article argues that Novartis won a more important battle elsewhere: to protect its profits in European and North American markets. The article shows how claims to ‘citizenship’ were mobilized by both anti-Novartis and pro-Novartis groups, and how Novartis’ global corporate citizenship programme succeeded even when it seemed to fail.

Keywords

Global Corporate CitizenshipHealth ActivismIndiaPharmaceutical IndustryPatent LawsTrade-Related Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS)
Type
Articles
Information
BioSocieties , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 165 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © London School of Economics and Political Science 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basheer, S. (2006). Protection of regulatory data under Article 39.3 of TRIPs: The Indian context. London: Intellectual Property Institute. URL (accessed January 2008): www.ip-institute.org.uk/pub.htmlGoogle Scholar
Basheer, S. (2007). The Mashelkar Committee Report on patents: Placing it in context OR reading the lines and not ‘between’ them. Spicy IP, 28 January. URL (accessed January 2008): http://spicyipindia.blogspot.com/2007/01/mashelkar-committee-report-on-patents_28.htmlGoogle Scholar
Berne Declaration. (2006). Novartis challenges the Indian Patent Law. 9 October. URL (accessed January 2008): www.evb.ch/en/p25011414.htmlGoogle Scholar
Berne Declaration. (2007). Statement of the Berne Declaration at Novartis’ AGM. 6 March. URL (accessed January 2008): www.evb.ch/en/p25012134.htmlGoogle Scholar
Bhandari, L., & Kale, S. (2007). West Bengal: Performance, facts and figures (Indian States at a glance 2006–07). Delhi: Pearson.Google Scholar
Biehl, J. (2004). The activist state: Global pharmaceuticals, AIDS, and citizenship in Brazil. Social Text, 22, 105–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1998). Utopia of endless exploitation: The essence of neoliberalism. Le Monde Diplomatique, December. URL (accessed January 2008): http://mondediplo.com/1998/12/08bourdieuGoogle Scholar
Cancer Patients Aid Association. (2006). Affidavit in response to Novartis, Writ Petition No. 24759, 9 September, High Court Chennai.Google Scholar
Cancer Patients Aid Association. (2007). CPAA sends defamation notice to Novartis. 30 January. URL (accessed March 2008):www.cpaaindia.org/aboutus/PublicEyeAwards.htmGoogle Scholar
Chaudhuri, S. (2005). The WTO and India's pharmaceuticals industry. New Delhi: Oxford UP.Google Scholar
Ecks, S. (2005). Pharmaceutical citizenship: Antidepressant marketing and the promise of demarginalization in India. Anthropology & Medicine, 12, 239–254.Google Scholar
Ecks, S. (2007). Comment on C. Hayden, A generic solution? Current Anthropology, 48, 490–491.Google Scholar
Economic Times (India) (2008). Natco Pharma up 5% as SC stays Novartis hearing. 29 January. URL (accessed April 2008): http://economictimes.indiatimes.com/stocks_in_news_home/Natco_Pharma_up_5/articleshow/2740369.cmsGoogle Scholar
Express Pharma. (2004) Generic companies withdraw imatinib mesylate. 6 February. URL (accessed April 2008): www.expresspharmaonline.com/story.php?&idno=436Google Scholar
Fuller, C.J. (1992). Review of The gift: The form and reason for exchange in archaic societies by M. Mauss. Man (n.s.), 27, 431–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerhardsen, T.I.S. (2006). Novartis persists with challenge to Indian patent law despite adversity. URL(accessed March 2008): www.ip-watch.org/weblog/index.php?p=430&res=1280_ff&print=0Google Scholar
Government of India, Ministry of Law and Justice. (2005). The Patents (Amendment) Act. URL (accessed 15 January 2008): www.patentoffice.nic.in/ipr/patent/patent_2005.pdfGoogle Scholar
Hayden, C. (2007). A generic solution? Pharmaceuticals and the politics of the similar in Mexico. Current Anthropology, 48,475–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (2004). Science and citizenship: A new synergy. Science and Public Policy, 31, 90–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffery, R., Ecks, S., & Brhlikova, P. (2007). Global assemblages of pharmaceuticals: Rethinking TRIPS and GMP. Biblio, 30 (3), 45–52.Google Scholar
Lawyers Collective. (2007a). www.lawyerscollective.org/%5Eamtc/%5EPatent_Oppositions/gleevec/gleevec-15-2-07.asp (last accessed 27 July 2007).Google Scholar
Lawyers Collective. (2007b). www.lawyerscollective.org/%5Eamtc/Mashelkar_Committee/news_&_updates/news1.asp (last accessed 27 July 2007).Google Scholar
Mauss, M. (1997 [1925]). Sociologie et anthropologie. Précédé d'une introduction à l’œuvre de Marcel Mauss par Claude Lévi-Strauss. Paris: Quadrige/Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Médecins Sans Frontières. (2007). People before patents: the lives of millions are at stake!! Online petition. URL (accessed January 2008):www.msf.org/petition_india/international.htmlGoogle Scholar
Novartis. (2006a). Annual Report 2006. URL (accessed January 2008): www.novartis.com/downloads/investors/reports/AR06_E_web.pdfGoogle Scholar
Novartis. (2006b). Novartis v Union of India, Writ Petition No. 24754 of 2006, High Court, Chennai.Google Scholar
Novartis. (2007a). About Novartis: Ranjit Shahani. URL (accessed April 2008): http://youtube.com/watch?v=wNhijTE6dxoGoogle Scholar
Novartis. (2007b). About Novartis: History of Glivec in India. URL (accessed January 2008): www.novartis.com/downloads/about-novartis/glivec-history-india.pdfGoogle Scholar
Novartis. (2007c). Corporate citizenship review. URL (accessed March 2008): www.novartis.com/downloads/about-novartis/CCR_English.pdfGoogle Scholar
Novartis. (2007d). Corporate Citizenship News. URL (accessed January 2008): www.novartis.com/about-novartis/corporate-citizenship/news/2007-01-07_influential_sustainability.shtmlGoogle Scholar
Novartis. (2007e). Novartis provides free access to patients globally. Video clip, 9 March. URL (accessed January 2008): www.youtube.com/watch?v=_3w8ldf3KwIGoogle Scholar
Novartis. (2007f). Novartis seeking clarity in Indian patent laws: A critical incentive for long-term R&D investments into better medicines for patients. Business Wire India, 15 February. URL (accessed January 2008): www.businesswireindia.com/PressRelease.asp?b2mid=12008Google Scholar
Novartis. (2007g). Novartis strategic healthcare portfolio drives sustained strong performance with record full-year results in 2006. Novartis media release, 18 January.: URL (accessed March 2008): http://cws.huginonline.com/N/134323/PR/200701/1098754_5.htmlGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, V. (2004). Antiretroviral globalism, biopolitics, and therapeutic citizenship. In Ong, A. & Collier, S. (Eds), Global assemblages: Technology, politics, and ethics as anthropological problem, 124–144. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Oxfam. (2007). Email pharmaceutical giant Novartis. URL (accessed July 2007): www.oxfam.org.uk/what_you_can_do/campaign/mtf/actions/novartis.htmGoogle Scholar
Park, C., & Prabha, A. (2007). Patent wrong. Times of India, 12 February. URL (accessed January 2008):http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/OPINION/Editorial/LEADER_ARTICLE_Patent_Wrong/articleshow/1593525.cmsGoogle Scholar
Parry, J. (1986). The gift, the Indian gift and the ‘Indian gift’. Man (n.s.), 21, 453–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petryna, A. (2002). Life exposed: Biological citizenship after Chernobyl. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.Google Scholar
Pharmabiz. (2004). SC admits cancer patients’ petition against granting EMR for Gleevec. 11 August. URL (accessed March 2008): www.pharmabiz.com/article/detnews.asp?articleid=23237&sectionid=44Google Scholar
Pharmabiz. (2005a). Letter to the Editor. 15 April. URL (accessed January 2008):www.pharmabiz.com/article/detnews.asp?articleid=27114&sectionid=44Google Scholar
Pharmabiz. (2005b). Editorial: Pricing cancer drugs. 20 April. URL (accessed March 2008):www.pharmabiz.com/article/detnews.asp?articleid=27192&sectionid=47Google Scholar
Pharmabiz. (2007a). IPAB postpones hearing of Novartis Glivec case to July 2. 18 June. URL (accessed March 2008): www.pharmabiz.com/article/detnews.asp?articleid=39348&sectionid=44Google Scholar
Pharmabiz. (2007b). Mashelkar gets 3 months to correct report on Patent Law issues. 15 March. URL (accessed March 2008): www.pharmabiz.com/article/detnews.asp?articleid=37997&sectionid=19Google Scholar
Pharmabiz. (2007c). Dr Mashelkar resigns as TEG chairman. 17 March. URL (accessed March 2008): www.pharmabiz.com/article/detnews.asp?articleid=38046&sectionid=17Google Scholar
Pharmabiz. (2008). SC stays hearing of Glivec case by IPAB sans technical member. 29 January. URL (accessed March 2008): www.pharmabiz.com/article/detnews.asp?articleid=42735&sectionid=44Google Scholar
Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America. (2003). Pharmaceutical companies lead the way in corporate philanthropy. URL (accessed January 2008): www.phrma.org/files/2004-01-20.884.pdfGoogle Scholar
Purkayastha, P. (2007). Novartis and Mashelkar: Tripping up on patents. People's Democracy, 31 (10), 11 March. URL (accessed March 2008): http://pd.cpim.org/2007/0311/03112007_snd.htmGoogle Scholar
Redfield, P. (2005). Doctors, borders, and life in crisis. Cultural Anthropology, 20 (3):328–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, N. (2006). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.Google Scholar
Srinivas, A. (2007). ‘Certain inaccuracies have crept in’: A contrite but defiant Mashelkar withdraws his patent report. Outlook Magazine, 5 March. URL (accessed January 2008): www.outlookindia.com/fullprint.asp?choice=2&fodname=20070305&fname=Mashelkar+%28F%29&sid=1Google Scholar
Srinivasan, S. (2007). Battling patent laws: The Glivec case. Economic and Political Weekly, September 15, 2007, 3686–3690.Google Scholar
The Max Foundation. (2007). Press release: Gratitude meetings. 9 February. URL (accessed March 2008): www.maxaid.org/Default.aspx?trgt=newsstories&choice=70Google Scholar
Tripathi, S.K., Dey, D., & Hazra, A. (2005). Medicine prices and affordability in the state of West Bengal, India: Report of a survey supported by World Health Organization and Health Action International. URL (accessed January 2008): www.haiweb.org/medicineprices/surveys/200412IW/survey_report.pdfGoogle Scholar
United Nations. (2008). The global compact. URL (accessed March 2008): www.unglobalcompact.org/Google Scholar
Vasella, D., & Slater, N. (2003). Magic cancer bullet: How a little orange pill may rewrite medical history. New York:HarperCollins.Google Scholar