Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b6zl4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T09:34:10.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Foraging use of cultivated fields by the Houbara Bustard Chlamydotis undulata fuertaventurae Rothschild and Hartert, 1894 on Fuerteventura (Canary Islands)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

Félix M. Medina
Félix M. Medina
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of La Laguna, E-38271 La Laguna, Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The Houbara Bustard on Fuerteventura uses cultivated fields (gavias) as feeding sites, finding in these a high-level resource of easy access. A total of 521 visits were observed during this study, 81 to abandoned gavias, 139 to cultivated, and 301 to ploughed ones. This use was correlated with the total vegetation cover, as well as with cover by herbaceous plants and by alfalfa Medicago sativa. The relationship with invertebrate abundance was negative. Cultivated gavias were selected in relation to their alfalfa cover, abandoned gavias in relation to their herbaceous cover, and ploughed gavias were selected in relation to total vegetation cover, cover of herbaceous plants, Launaea arborescens and Salsola vermiculata cover, and vegetation height. Figs, present in ploughed gavias only, were a highly favoured food resource. Of the three study localities, Lajares was most visited by Houbaras (357 visits), followed by Triquivijate (105) and Tefía (59). This use was not correlated with the population of Houbaras in each locality but with the resources that were found in them. The gavias were used in all seasons of the year, mainly in summer, and less so in spring. In summer, use was correlated with herbaceous plant cover and associated to the presence of figs, and in winter with herbaceous cover; in autumn there was no overall selection for variables; in spring, selection was negative with respect to invertebrate availability. This predictable food resource is a real advantage for the maintenance of Houbara populations and contributes to the conservation of the species on Fuerteventura.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bird Conservation International , Volume 9 , Issue 4 , December 1999 , pp. 373 - 386
Copyright
Copyright © Birdlife International 1999

References

Alonso, J. C. and Alonso, J. A. (1990) Parámetros demográficos, selección de hábitats y distributión de la avutarda (Otis tarda) en tres regiones españolas. Madrid: Colección Técnica, ICONA.Google Scholar
Alonso, J. C, Alonso, J. A. and Veiga, J. P. (1987) Flocking in wintering Common Cranes Grus grus: influence of population size, food abundance and habitat patchiness. Ornis Scand. 18: 53–60.Google Scholar
Alonso, J. A., Alonso, J. C., Martín, E. and Morales, M. B. (1995) La Avutarda en la Reserva de Las Lagunas de Villafáflla. Institute de Estudios Zamoranos (CSIC). Zamora: Diputación de Zamora.Google Scholar
Bannerman, D. A. (1963) Birds of the atlantic islands, I. A history of the birds of the Canary Islands and of the Salvages. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Blanco, E. (1996) Higos y brevas: la curiosa fructificatión de la higuera. Quercus 120: 8–11.Google Scholar
Brown, J. S., Kotler, B. P. and Mitchell, W. A. (1994) Foraging theory, patch use, and the structure of a Negev Desert granivore community. Ecology 75: 2286–2300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, D. R. (1984) A study of the Canarian Houbara Bustard Chlamydotis undulata fuertaventurae, with special reference to its behaviour and ecology. Unpubl. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Collins, D. R. (1993) The diet of the Houbara Bustard Chlamydotis undulata fuertaventurae in the Canary Islands. Bol Mus. Mun. Funchal 2: 57–67.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. J. and Whitmore, R. C. (1990) Arthropod sampling methods in ornithology. Stud. Avian Biol. 13: 29–37.Google Scholar
Cramp, S. and Simmons, K. E. L. (1980) Handbook of the birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa, II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Domínguez-Casanova, F. (1989) The Houbara Bustard in the Canary Islands (Spain): towards a recovery plan. Bustard Stud. 4: 42–51.Google Scholar
Domínguez-Casanova, F. and Díaz, G. (1985) Plan de recuperatión de la Hubara Canaria. ICONA. Unpubl. report.Google Scholar
Galván, M. and Criado, C. (1985) Fuerteventura. Pp. 243–296 in Afonso, L., ed. Geografía de Canarias. Santa Cruz de Tenerife: Editorial Interinsular Canaria.Google Scholar
Hellmich, J. (1991) La Avutarda en Extremadura. Monografía de Alytes 2. Mérida: ADENEX.Google Scholar
Hidalgo de Trucios, S. J. and Carranza, J. (1990) Ecología y Comportamiento de la Avutarda (Otis tarda L.). Cáceres: Servicio de Publicaciones de la Universidad de Extremadura.Google Scholar
Hilden, O. (1965) Habitat selection in birds. Ann Zool. Fenn. 2: 53–75.Google Scholar
Hinz, C. and Heiss, E. M. (1989) The activity patterns of Houbara Bustards: aspects of a field study in the Canary Islands. Bustard Stud. 4: 68–79.Google Scholar
Hutto, R. L. (1990) Measuring the availability of food resources. Stud. Avian Biol. 13: 20–28.Google Scholar
Johnsgard, E. A. (1991) Bustards, hemipodes, and sandgrouse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. H. (1980) The comparision of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61: 65–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karr, J. R. and Brawn, J. D. (1990) Food resources of understorey birds in Centra Panamá: quantification and effects on avian populations. Stud. Avian Biol. 13: 58–64.Google Scholar
Kent, M. and Coker, P. (1992) Vegetation description and analysis: a practical approach. London: Belhaven Press.Google Scholar
Krebs, J. R. and Davies, N. B. (1993) An introduction to behavioural ecology, Third edition. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Lavee, D. (1985) The influence of grazing and intensive cultivation on the population size of the Houbara Bustard in the Northern Negev in Israel. Bustard Stud. 3: 103–107.Google Scholar
Martín, A., Nogales, M., Hernández, M. A., Lorenzo, J. A., Medina, F. M. and Rando, J. C. (1996) Status, conservation and habitat selection of the Houbara Bustard Chlamydotis undulata fuertaventurae on Lanzarote (Canary Islands). Bird Conserv. Internatn. 6: 229–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martín, A.Lorenzo, J. A., Hernández, M. A., Nogales, M., Medina, F. M., Delgado, J. D., Naranjo, J. J., Quilis, V. and Delgado, G. (1997) Distribution, status and conservation of the Houbara Bustard Chlamydotis undulata fuertaventurae Rothschild and Hartert, 1894, in the Canary Islands, November-December 1994. Ardeola 44: 61–69.Google Scholar
Martínez, C. (1991a) Patterns of distribution and habitat selection of a Great Bustard (Otis tarda) population in northwestern Spain. Ardeola 38: 137–147.Google Scholar
Martínez, C. (1991b) Selección de microhábitat en una población de Avutarda (Otis tarda) en un medio agrícola. Doñana Acta Vertebrata 18: 173–185.Google Scholar
Martínez, C. and de Juana, E. (1995) El Sisón. La Garcilla 92: 16–19.Google Scholar
Marzol-Jaen, M. V. (1984) El clima de Canarias. Pp. 157–202 in Alfonso, L., ed. Geografía de Canarias. Santa Cruz de Tenerife: Editorial Interinsular Canaria.Google Scholar
Mian, A. (1986) A contribution to the biology of Houbara: some studies on gizzard contents from 1983–84 wintering population in the Western Baluchistan. Pakistan J. Zool. 18: 363–370.Google Scholar
Osborne, P. (1984) Bird numbers and habitat characteristics in farmland hedgerows. J Appl. Ecol. 21: 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyke, G. H. (1984) Optimal foraging theory: a critical review. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 15: 523–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pyke, G. H., Pulliam, H. R. and Charnov, E. L. (1977) Optimal foraging: a selective review of theory and tests. Q. Rev. Biol. 52: 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rice, J. B., Anderson, B. W. and Ohmart, R. D. (1984) Comparison of the importance of different habitat attributes to avian community organization. J. Wildl. Management. 48: 895–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rotenberry, J. T. and Wiens, J. A. (1980) Habitat structure, patchyness, and avian communities in North American steppe vegetation: a multivariate analysis. Ecology 61: 1228–1250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schoener, T. W. (1971) Theory of feeding strategies. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2: 369–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seddon, P. J. and Van Heezik, Y. (1996) Seasonal changes in Houbara Bustard Chlamydotis undulata macqueenii numbers in Harrat Al Harrah, Saudi Arabia: implications for managing a remnant population. Biol. Conserv. 75: 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, F. R. and Fritzell, E. K. (1989) Habitat use, home range, and survival of territorial male Ruffed Grouse. J. Wildl. Management. 53: 15–21.Google Scholar
Tucker, G. M. and Health, M. F. (1994) Birds in Europe: their conservation status. Cambridge, U.K.BirdLife International (BirdLife Conservation Series 3).Google Scholar
Wiens, J. A. (1985) Habitat selection in variable environments: shrubsteppe birds. Pp. 227–251 in Cody, M. L., ed. Habitat selection in birds. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wiens, J. A., Rotenberry, J. T. and Van Home, B. (1986) A lesson in the limitations of field experiments: shrubsteppe birds and habitat alteration. Ecology 67: 365–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiens, J. A., Stenseth, N. C., Van Home, B. and Ims, R. A. (1993) Ecological mechanisms and landscape ecology. Oikos 66: 369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolda, H. (1990) Food availability for an insectivore and how to measure it. Stud. Avian Biol. 13: 38–43.Google Scholar