Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:38:20.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Genetic endangerment of wild Red Junglefowl Gallus gallus?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

A. Townsend Peterson  and
I. Lehr Brisbin Jr
A. Townsend Peterson
Affiliation:
Natural History Museum, The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045, U.S.A.
I. Lehr Brisbin Jr
Affiliation:
Savannah River Ecology Laboratory, P.O. Drawer E, Aiken, South Carolina 29802, U.S.A.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Domestic chickens were derived from the wild Red Junglefowl Gallus gallus. A survey of 745 museum specimens of Red Junglefowl suggests that most wild populations have been contaminated genetically by introgression of genes from domestic or feral chickens. A male eclipse plumage, which appears to be an indicator of pure wild genotypes, was found in populations in the western and central portions of the species's range, but not in the easternmost populations. Eclipse plumages probably disappeared from extreme south-eastern Asia and the Philippines prior to the advent of intensive scientific collecting (about 1860) and have not been observed in Malaysia and neighbouring countries since the 1920S. Populations exhibiting eclipse plumages were found in north-eastern India as late as the 1960s, but the dense human populations there make their continuing genetic integrity uncertain. These data suggest that surveys of wild and captive populations should be undertaken to assess the genetic integrity of this species. A re-evaluation of the conservation status of Red Junglefowl might then follow.

Type
Research Article
Information
Bird Conservation International , Volume 8 , Issue 4: Special Issue: International Galliformes Symposium , December 1998 , pp. 387 - 394
Copyright
Copyright © Birdlife International 1998

References

Ali, S. and Ripley, S. D. (1987) Compact handbook of the birds of India and Pakistan. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beebe, W. (1926) Pheasants: their lives and homes. Garden City, New York: Doubleday, Page and Co.Google Scholar
Delacour, J. (1977) Pheasants of the world. Second edition Surrey, U.K: World Pheasant Association and Saiga.Google Scholar
Fumihito, A., Miyake, T., Sumi, S., Takada, M., Ohno, S. and Kondo, N. (1994) One subspecies of the Red Junglefowl (Gallus gallus gallus) suffices as the matriarchic ancestor of all domestic breeds. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 91: 12505–12509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnsgard, P. A. (1986) The pheasants of the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnston, R. F., Siegel-Causey, D. and Johnson, S. (1988) European populations of the Rock Dove Columba livia and genotypic extinction. Am. Midi. Natur. 120: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, A. M., AND Stettenheim, P. R. (1972) Avian anatomy. Integument. Part 1. U.S. Dept. Agric. Handbook 362: 1–340.Google Scholar
Morejohn, G. V. (1968) Study of plumage of the four species of the genus Gallus. Condor 70: 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, H. C., AND Kloss, C. B. (1920) On the proper name of the Red Jungle Fowl from peninsular India. Rec. Indian Mus. 19: 13–15.Google Scholar
Stevens, L. (1991) Genetics and evolution of the domestic fowl. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, B., AND Zhou, B.-X. (1989) Did chickens go north? New evidence for domestication. World's Poultry Sci. J. 45: 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar