Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:06:55.345Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

RE: Impact on psychiatrists in intellectual disability of Court of Protection orders for section 49 (Mental Capacity Act) reports: online survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 February 2023

Niraj Singh
Affiliation:
Consultant Psychiatrist in Intellectual Disability, Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust, and Executive Committee Member, Royal College of Psychiatrists, UK. Email: nirajsingh1@nhs.net
Asit Biswas
Affiliation:
Consultant Psychiatrist in Intellectual Disability, Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust, and Vice-Chair of the Faculty of Intellectual Disability, Royal College of Psychiatrists, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Correspondence
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Royal College of Psychiatrists

In response to this article in the BJPsych Bulletin Reference Perera, Leyland and Coshever1, we note with great concern the statistics on the impact of section 49 reports on intellectual disability psychiatrists. Of the 104 psychiatrists who responded, 65.4% had been ordered to undertake a section 49 report; 51.5% of those had been asked to provide an opinion outside their subjective expertise, 25% were somewhat or fully confident in writing reports and 85% stated that they experienced stress as a result. This is a huge indictment of the impact that section 49 reports have had on workforce well-being. Psychiatrists with already heavy workloads in stretched services have little recourse or ability to negotiate these instructions. We therefore support and reinforce the proposals put forward by Perera et al.

  1. (a) Training must be provided to doctors in mental capacity assessment and section 49 report writing.

  2. (b) A dedicated section 49 report team should be available within trusts. A specialty-specific psychiatrist should be recruited to prepare those reports, which are not limited to intellectual disability psychiatry but also extend to old age psychiatry, neuropsychiatry, brain injury services and adult mental health among others. Where warranted, neuropsychological expertise must be available as part of the team for cognitive testing.

  3. (c) Where a psychiatrist cannot be recruited to prepare these reports, time must be incorporated into job planning.

  4. (d) Trusts should continue to survey the impact of this workload.

  5. (e) Terms of arrangement must be developed by trusts in order to ensure psychiatrists have adequate support and time to prepare section 49 reports.

  6. (f) Administrative support needs to be provided for the reports both for documentation and communication with the legal team.

Declaration of interest

None

References

Perera, S, Leyland, N, Coshever, J. Impact on psychiatrists in intellectual disability of Court of Protection orders for section 49 (Mental Capacity Act) reports: online survey. BJPsych Bull [Epub ahead of print] 2 Mar 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjb.2022.10.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.