Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T16:56:50.114Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

International employment schemes for people with mental health problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Bob Grove*
Affiliation:
Mental Health Europe, Brussels, email doctorbobgrove@aol.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

It has been recognised that work is a positive factor for mental health since the days of Galen (2nd century CE). It was central to the theories and practice of William Tuke at the Retreat in York (founded 1796) and has continued in different forms as a therapy and/or a form of rehabilitation ever since. These forms can be usefully divided into four main categories: sheltered work, vocational training, transitional employment (or work experience) and supported employment. These broad categories have been adapted to different cultures and economic circumstances across the world. There are advantages and disadvantages to all forms, but the burgeoning research literature of the past 20 years does show that when it comes to finding people paid work in the open labour market, supported employment is markedly more successful than other methods.

Type
Special Papers
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists 2015

References

Boardman, J. & Rinaldi, M. (2013) Difficulties in implementing supported employment for people with severe mental health problems. British Journal of Psychiatry, 203, 247249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E. & Becker, D. R. (2008) An update on randomized controlled trials of evidence-based supported employment. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 31, 280290.Google Scholar
Bond, G. R., Drake, R. E. & Becker, D. R. (2012) Generalizability of the individual placement and support (IPS) model of supported employment outside the US. World Psychiatry, 11, 3239.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burns, T., Catty, J. & EQOLISE Group (2008) IPS in Europe: the EQOLISE trial. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 31, 313317.Google Scholar
Crowther, R., Marshall, M., Bond, G. R., et al (2001) Vocational rehabilitation for people with severe mental illness. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2, CD003080. Available at http://summaries.cochrane.org/CD003080/SCHIZ_vocational-rehabilitation-for-people-with-severe-mental-illness (accessed September 2015).Google Scholar
Heslin, M., Howard, L., Leese, M., et al (2011) Randomized controlled trial of supported employment in England: 2 year follow-up of the Supported Work and Needs (SWAN) study. World Psychiatry, 10, 132137.Google Scholar
Knapp, M., Patel, A., Curran, C., et al (2013) Supported employment: cost-effectiveness across six European sites. World Psychiatry, 12, 6068.Google Scholar
Macias, C., Rodican, C. F., Hargreaves, W. A., et al (2006) Supported employment outcomes of a randomized controlled trial of ACT and clubhouse models. Psychiatric Services, 57, 14061415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, A. (2004) The rise of social cooperatives in Italy. Voluntas, 15, 243263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, R. & Mandiberg, J. (2006) An update on affirmative businesses or social firms for people with mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 57, 10. Available at http://ps.psychiatryonline.org/article.aspx?articleID=97136 (accessed September 2015).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.