Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-dwch4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-25T10:55:39.825Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Extracts and Comments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2024

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Information

Type
Other
Information
Blackfriars , Volume 17 , Issue 199 , October 1936 , pp. 777 - 786
Copyright
Copyright © 1936 Provincial Council of the English Province of the Order of Preachers

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 But we may recall that a Blackfriars contributor has written: “Largo Caballero, for all his Marxist paraphernalia of clenched fists and Red flags, his wild talk of civil war, and his soubriquet of ‘the Spanish Lenin,’ is of no deeper dye than the English Labour Party.” (April, 1936, Page 292.)

2 “We have no wish to repudiate anything we have written on the subject” is all that The Universe (September 18) had to say when we pointed out the misrepresentation. Indeed, the offence is repeated on the same page which reproduces News Review's misquotation of the first seven lines of p. 705 of BLACKFRIARS omitting the crucial phrases “on that account” and “not only does not follow, but.” No indication is given that the passage has been mutilated and its meaning, in consequence, seriously falsified.—Penguin.