Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T12:08:27.073Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Improving Communication for People with Brain Injury in the 21st Century: The Value of Collaboration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 April 2013

Leanne Togher
Leanne Togher*
Affiliation:
NHMRC Senior Research Fellow, Speech Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Australia Chief Investigator, NHMRC Clinical Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Rehabilitation, http://www.ccreaphasia.org.au/ Chief Investigator, NHMRC Centre for Research Excellence in Brain Recovery, http://moving-ahead.com.au/
*
Address for correspondence: Professor Leanne Togher, Discipline of Speech Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, PO Box 170 Lidcombe, NSW 2141, Australia. E-mail: leanne.togher@sydney.edu.au
Get access

Abstract

This paper describes the value of collaboration from two perspectives. The first perspective highlights the benefit of teaching communication partners collaborative communication strategies to facilitate the interactions of people with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Collaborative strategies encompass the provision of collaborative intent, emotional and cognitive support, positive questioning styles and collaborative turn taking. Translating research outcomes into accessible resources is described with reference to the TBI Express website which has video demonstrations of conversation strategies for communication partners of people with TBI. The broader meaning of collaboration is also discussed, with particular focus on the advantages collaboration can provide in advancing rehabilitation outcomes for people with acquired brain injury, their families and social networks. Collaboration is described in terms of encompassing all relevant contributors to the development of research advances, including people with acquired brain injury, their families and social networks, stakeholders, clinicians, peak bodies, students and researchers. Two examples of large-scale research collaborations occurring within Australia are described, including the NHMRC Clinical Centre of Research Excellence in Aphasia Rehabilitation and the NHMRC Moving Ahead Centre for Research Excellence in Brain Recovery, also known as Moving Ahead.

Keywords

traumatic brain injurycommunication partner trainingcollaborationaphasiarehabilitationresearch translation
Type
ASSBI PRESIDENTIAL ADDRESS 2012
Information
Brain Impairment , Volume 14 , Issue 1: State of the art reviews in mental health after traumatic brain injury , May 2013 , pp. 130 - 138
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Australian Academic Press Pty Ltd 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamovich, B., & Henderson, J. (1992). Scales of cognitive ability for traumatic brain injury (Normed edition). Chicago: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar
Behn, N., Togher, L., Power, E., & Heard, R. (2012). Evaluating communication training for paid carers of people with traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 26 (13–14), 1702–1715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bogart, E., Togher, L., Power, E., & Docking, K. (2012). Casual conversations between individuals with traumatic brain injury and their friends. Brain Injury, 26 (3), 221–233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eggins, S., & Slade, D. (1997). Analysing casual conversation. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Guo, Y.E., & Togher, L. (2008). The impact of dysarthria on everyday communication after traumatic brain injury: A pilot study. Brain Injury, 22 (1), 83–97.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haarbauer-Krupa, J., Henry, K., Szekeres, S.F., & Ylvisaker, M. (1985). Cognitive rehabilitation therapy: Late stages of recovery. In Ylvisaker, M. (Ed.), Head injury rehabilitation: Children and adolescents (pp. 311–346). Austin, Texas: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
Hagen, C. (1984). Language disorders in head trauma. In Holland, A. (Ed.), Language disorders in adults (pp. 245–281). San Diego, CA: College Hill Press.Google Scholar
Hartley, L., & Jensen, P. (1991). Narrative and procedural discourse after closed head injury. Brain Injury, 5 (3), 267–285.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jorgensen, M., & Togher, L. (2009). Narrative after traumatic brain injury: a comparison of monologic and jointly-produced discourse. Brain Injury, 23 (9), 727–740.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kagan, A., Black, S., Duchan, J., Simmons-Mackie, N., & Square, P. (2001). Training volunteers as conversational partners using ‘Supported Conversation with Adults with Aphasia’ (SCA): A controlled trial. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 44, 624–638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kertesz, A. (2006). Western Aphasia Battery – Revised (WAB-R). UK: Pearson Psychorp.Google Scholar
McDonald, S., Anderson, V., Ponsford, J., Tate, R., Togher, L., Morgan, A., . . . Murdoch, B. (2012). Moving Ahead: A new Centre of Research Excellence in Brain Recovery, focusing on psychosocial reintegration following traumatic brain injury. Brain Impairment, 13 (2), 256–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prutting, C.A., & Kirchner, D.M. (1987). A clinical appraisal of the pragmatic aspects of language. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 52, 105–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Togher, L. (2000). Giving information: The importance of context on communicative opportunity for people with traumatic brain injury. Aphasiology, 14 (4), 365–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Togher, L., Hand, L., & Code, C. (1997). Analysing discourse in the traumatic brain injury population: Telephone interactions with different communication partners. Brain Injury, 11 (3), 169–189.Google ScholarPubMed
Togher, L., McDonald, S., Code, C., & Grant, S. (2004). Training communication partners of people with traumatic brain injury: a randomised controlled trial. Aphasiology, 18 (4), 313–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Togher, L., McDonald, S., Tate, R., Power, E., & Rietdijk, R. (2009). Training communication partners of people with traumatic brain injury: Reporting the protocol for a clinical trial. Brain Impairment, 10 (2), 188–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Togher, L., McDonald, S., Tate, R., Power, E., & Rietdijk, R. (2010). Measuring the social interactions of people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners: the adapted Kagan scales. Aphasiology, 24 (6–8), 914–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Togher, L., McDonald, S., Tate, R., Power, E., & Riedijk, R. (in press). Training communication partners of people with severe traumatic brain injury improves everyday conversations: A multicenter single blind clinical trial. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine.Google Scholar
Togher, L., McDonald, S., Tate, R., Power, E., Ylvisaker, M., & Riedijk, R. (2011). TBI Express: A social communication training manual for people with TBI and thier communication partners. Sydney: Australian Society for the Study of Brain Impairment.Google Scholar
Togher, L., Power, E., Riedijk, R., McDonald, S., & Tate, R. (2012). An exploration of participant experience of communication training programs for people with traumatic brain injury and their communication partners. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34 (18), 1562–1574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tu, L. V., Togher, L., & Power, E. (2011). The impact of communication partner and discourse task on a person with traumatic brain injury: The use of multiple perspectives. Brain Injury, 25 (6), 560–580.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ylvisaker, M. (1992). Communication outcome following traumatic brain injury. Seminars in Speech and Language, 13 (4), 239–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ylvisaker, M. (1998). Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: Children and adolescents. Boston, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Ylvisaker, M., & Feeney, T. (1998). Collaborative brain injury intervention: Positive everyday routines. San Diego: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Ylvisaker, M., Feeney, T.J., & Urbanczyk, B. (1993a). Developing a positive communication culture for rehabilitation: Communication training for staff and family members. In Durgin, C.J., Schmidt, N.D. & Fryer, L.J. (Eds.), Staff development and clinical intervention in brain injury rehabilitation (pp. 57–81). Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.Google Scholar
Ylvisaker, M., Feeney, T.J., & Urbanczyk, B. (1993b). A social-environmental approach to communication and behavior after traumatic brain injury. Seminars in Speech and Language, 14 (1), 74–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ylvisaker, M., Sellars, C., & Edelman, L. (1998). Rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury in preschoolers. In Ylvisaker, M. (Ed.), Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation. Children and adolescents (pp. 303–329). Newton, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Ylvisaker, M., Szekeres, S., & Feeney, T. (2001). Communication disorders associated with traumatic brain injury. In Chapey, R. (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (4th ed., pp. 745–808). Baltimore, MD: Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
Ylvisaker, M., Turkstra, L.S., & Coelho, C. (2005). Behavioral and social interventions for individuals with traumatic brain injury: A summary of the research with clinical implications. Seminars in Speech and Language, 26 (4), 256–267.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ylvisaker, M., Urbanczyk, B., & Feeney, T.J. (1992). Social skills following traumatic brain injury. Seminars in Speech and Language, 13, 308–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar