Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 November 2011
This article reports a study of the distribution of Romano-British coarse wares in southern England. The term coarse wares, as used here, includes all wares except colour-coated or painted fabrics, samian and mortaria. These coarse wares were examined in the hope that a detailed study would provide some information about local marketing processes, or at least indicate what was the maximum amount of information that could be obtained from existing pottery-distributions by the methods employed. An area was chosen, the south and west, where a large number of site collections have been recovered. Pottery from as many sites as possible in museums and private collections was examined with the aim of finding exceptionally distinctive types whose distributions could be reliably plotted and whose percentages in each assemblage counted.
1 The material for this study was examined in 1972. I should like to thank most sincerely all the curators and private collectors who made the work possible.
2 Hodder, I., forthcoming, ‘The distribution of Savernake ware’, Wilts. Arch. Mag. (1974)Google Scholar.
3 Jope, E. M., in Foster, I. L. and Alcock, L. (eds.), Culture and Environment (1963). 327-50.Google Scholar
4 Hodder, I.. forthcoming, op. cit. (note 2).Google Scholar
5 and 6 Hodder, I., forthcoming, op. cit. (note 2).Google Scholar
7 Alonso, W., ‘Location theory’, in Friedmann, J. and Alonso, W. (eds.), Regional Development and Planning: a Reader (1964), 78-106Google Scholar.
8 Alonso, W., op. cit., 98.Google Scholar
9 I. Hodder, forthcoming, ‘The distributions of two types of Romano-British coarse pottery in the West Sussex region’, in Sussex Arch. Coll. See also appendix.
10 Hodder, I., op. cit. (note 9), fig. 4.Google Scholar
11 Berry, B. J. L., The geography of Market Centres and Retail Distribution (1967), 41Google Scholar. See also Hodder, , op. cit. (note 9).Google Scholar
12 Trans. Wares. Arch. Soc. 3, i (1967), 15–28.Google Scholar
13 I should like to thank A. Garrard for his help in examining the sherds.
14 PPS xxxiv (1968), 414–26.Google Scholar
15 Johnston, D. E., Antiq. Journ. xlix (1969), 75–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Johnston, D. E., op. cit. (note 15), 75.Google Scholar
17 Patourel, H. E. J. le, Medieval Archaeology xii (1968), 101–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18 Berry, B. J. L., op. cit. (note 11), 94.Google Scholar
15 Frere, S. S., Britannia, A History of Roman Britain (1967), 263.Google Scholar
20 Hodder, I., in Clarke, D. L. (ed.), Models in Archaeology (1972), 902.Google Scholar
21 Lowther, A. W. G., Roman Relief-Patterned Flue- Tiles Found in Surrey, and Others of this Type Found in Southern England (Research papers of the Surrey Archaeological Society i) (1948).Google Scholar
22 Hodder, I., op. cit. (note 9).Google Scholar
23 Williams, J. H., ‘Roman building materials in south-east England’, Britannia ii (1971), 178.Google Scholar
24 Williams, J. H., op. cit. (note 23), 178.Google Scholar
25 Williams, J. H., Trans. Bristol and Gloucs. Arch. Soc. xc (1971), 95–119.Google Scholar
26 Smith, D. J., in Rivet, A. L. F. (ed.), The Roman Villa in Britain (1969)Google Scholar; see also Hodder, , op. cit. (note 20), 903.Google Scholar
27 The percentages of Oxford and New Forest wares in the walled towns and a number of other important sites were provided by M. Fulford.
28 See also Swan, V., in Current Research in Romano-British Coarse Pottery (C.B.A. Research Report x) (1973), 123–4.Google Scholar
29 See also Young, G. J., in Current Research in Romano-British Coarse Pottery (C.B.A. Research Report x) (1973). 111.Google Scholar
30 Young, C. J., Oxoniensia xxxvii (1972), 23.Google Scholar
31 Wedlake, W. J., Excavations at Camerton, Somerset (1958), 87.Google Scholar
32 Fulford, M., Britannia iv (1973), 160–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33 Information from P. V. Webster.
34 Bellamy, C. V. and Patourel, H. E. J. le, Medieval Archaeology xiv (1970), 104–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar, H. E. J. le Patourel, op. cit. (note 17).
35 Connah, D. B., Archaeological News Letter vii (1964), 235–7Google Scholar. See also Berks, . Arch. Journ. lx (1962), 118.Google Scholar
36 Finds in Reading Museum.
37 Britannia ii (1971), 284.Google Scholar
38 Archaeological Review (1966).Google Scholar
39 Cunliffe, B., Proc. Hants. Field Club and Arch. Soc. xxii (1961), 8–24.Google Scholar
40 Green, T. K., Sussex Arch. Coll. cviii (1970), 23–38.Google Scholar
41 Gillam, J. P., in Swoboda, E. (ed.), Carnuntina (1956), 64-77Google Scholar.
42 For further examples see Hartley, K. F., Current Research in Romano-British Coarse Pottery (C.B.A. Research Report x) (1973), 39–51.Google Scholar
43 Gillam, J. P., Antiq. Journ. xix (1939), 429–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kay, S. O., Derbyshire Arch. Journ. lxxxii (1962), 21–42.Google Scholar
44 Webster, P. V., Arch. Aeliana 1 (1972), 191–203.Google Scholar
45 Brodribb, G., Sussex Arch. Coll. cvii (1969), 102–25.Google Scholar
46 R. A. H. Farrar, ‘The techniques and sources of Romano-British black-burnished ware’, and Peacock, D. P. S., ‘The black-burnished pottery industry in Dorset’, in Current Research in Romano-British Coarse Pottery (C.B.A. Research Report x) (1973), 67–103 and 414–26.Google Scholar
47 Webster, G., Antiq. Journ. xxxv (1955), 199–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
48 Beavis, J., Proc. Dorset Mat. Hist, and Arch. Soc. xcii (1971), 181–204.Google Scholar
49 Lawson, A. J.. The Artifacts of Kimmeridge Shale and Jet from Roman Silchester, B.Sc. Honours Thesis, Cardiff (1972).Google Scholar