Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:10:14.577Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Merging With-Profits and Unit-Linked Life Funds in a Proprietary Company: Actuarial Considerations Based on a Case Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2011

R.M. Paul
R.M. Paul
Affiliation:
9 Braid Farm Road, Edinburgh, EH10 6LG, U.K. Tel: +44 (0)131 447 3482; Fax: +44 (0)131 447 1973
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In the current financial climate takeovers of proprietary life companies by other life companies, amalgamations of mutuals and demutualisations have become more and more prevalent. However in respect of takeovers, the process does not end with the purchase, but normally results in the transfer of the long-term business of one of the companies to the other. To optimise synergy and administrative efficiency, there may be a need to reconstruct the amalgamated funds.

The author has been involved as Appointed Actuary and internal project manager in such transfers of business within proprietary companies and has also acted as an independent actuary and as an external project manager for other transfers. One of these transfers involved four companies transacting both with-profits and unit-linked business in which the interests of both policyholders and shareholder had to be protected. He considered this transfer to be of sufficient interest to merit the preparation of a paper discussing the issues which arose. Although the paper is principally based on that transfer as a case study, relevant and related factors arising in other transfers have been included where appropriate, as have references to the role of the actuary before, during and after reconstruction.

In the case study, the scheme of transfer and the associated reconstruction of corporate structure involved merging three separate with-profits funds, merging many unit-linked funds (including unitised with-profits) and, subject to appropriate compensation, rationalisation of the rights to surplus attributable to both with-profits policyholders and shareholder.

Keywords

Transfer of BusinessSection 49Restructuring Life CompaniesMerging With-Profits FundsRights to Surplus
Type
Sessional meetings: papers and abstracts of discussions
Information
British Actuarial Journal , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , 01 August 1996 , pp. 623 - 702
Copyright
Copyright © Institute and Faculty of Actuaries 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Burdon, P.V. (1991). From FS Assurance to Britannia Life: a case study. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 62, 431—453.Google Scholar
Evenett, H. (1995). Transfers of life insurance portfolios in the United Kingdom. International Insurance Law Review.Google Scholar
Faculty of Actuaries Bonus and Valuation Research Group (1991). Restructuring mutuals — principles and practice. T.F.A. 43, 167–277.Google Scholar
Hunter, J.R. & Jones, E.J. (1986). Merging life funds. T.F.A. 40, 170–248.Google Scholar
Needleman, P.D. & Roff, T.A. (1995). Asset shares and their use in the financial management of a with-profits fund. B.A.J. 1, 603–688.Google Scholar
Needleman, P.D. & Westall, G. (1991). Demutualisation of a United Kingdom mutual life insurance company. J.I.A. 118, 321–128 and T.F.A. 43, 278–375.Google Scholar
O'Neill, J.E. & Froggatt, H.W. (1993). Unitised with profits — Gamaliel's advice. J.I.A. 120, 415–469.Google Scholar
Pell, M. (1991). Transfers of United Kingdom long term business. Staple inn Actuarial Society.Google Scholar
Salmon, I.A. & Fine, A.E.M. (1991). Reflections on a takeover of a United Kingdom insurer: a case study. J.I.A. 118, 59–170.Google Scholar
Working Party of the Life Assurance Joint Committee of the Institute and the Faculty of Actuaries (1994). Life insurance company takeovers. J.I.A. 121, 199–258.Google Scholar