Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2021
This article examines the most controversial of the activities of the India Meteorological Department (IMD): long-term seasonal forecasting for the South Asian subcontinent. Under the pressure of recurrent famines, in 1886 the imperial IMD commenced annual issue of monsoon predictions several months in advance, focused on one variable: rainfall. This state service was new to global late nineteenth-century meteorology, attempted first and most rigorously in India. Successive IMD leaders adapted the forecast in light of scientific and infrastructural developments, continuously revising the underlying methods of its production. All methods failed to achieve accurate prevision. Nevertheless, the imperatives of economic administration, empire and public demand compelled IMD scientists to continue annual publication of this unreliable product. This article contends that the seasonal forecast is best understood as an enduring ritual of good governance in a monsoonal environment. Through analysis of newspaper controversies, it suggests that although the seasonal forecast was the most compelling justification for the IMD's imperial and global importance, its limitations undercut popular trust in modern meteorology. Finally, this case illustrates the centrality of ‘tropical meteorology’ to the historical development of modern atmospheric science.
1 Markham, Clements, A Memoir on the Indian Surveys, 2nd edn, London: W.H. Allen and Co., 1878, p. 302Google Scholar.
2 On the 1876–8 South Indian famine as a global event and the GOI's decision to prioritize free-market ideologies over humanitarian famine relief see Davis, Mike, Late Victorian Holocausts: El Niño Famines and the Making of the Third World, London: Verso, 2001, pp. 25–59Google Scholar.
3 Anderson, Katharine, Predicting the Weather: Victorians and the Science of Meteorology, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2005, pp. 264–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Porter, Theodore, The Rise of Statistical Thinking, 1820–1900, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1986, pp. 272–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Blanford, Henry F., ‘The eleven-year periodical fluctuation of the Carnatic rainfall’, Nature (1887) 36, pp. 227–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
5 Henry Blanford, Memorandum on the Establishment of a Uniform Meteorological System for India, Archive Y23.D2 (Fragment No. 4), pp. 21–9, UK National Meteorological Library & Archive (subsequently NMLA).
6 On nineteenth-century developments in statistics see Porter, op. cit. (3), pp. 270–314; Foucault, Michel, The Order of Things, New York: Vintage, 1973Google Scholar; Gigerenzer, Gerd, Swijtink, Zeno, Porter, Theodore, Daston, Lorraine, Beatty, John and Krüger, Lorenz, The Empire of Chance: How Probability Changed Science and Everyday Life, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
7 Editorial, The Pioneer, 10 August 1899, p. 1.
8 Banerji, S.K., ‘Methods of foreshadowing monsoon and winter rainfall in India’, Indian Journal of Meteorology & Geophysics (1950) 1(1), pp. 4–14, 14 (emphasis mine)Google Scholar.
9 The architects of these frameworks, emerging from post-colonial studies and the history of technology, include Said, Edward, Orientalism, New York: Pantheon Books, 1978Google Scholar; Headrick, Daniel R., The Tools of Empire: Technology and European Imperialism in the Nineteenth Century, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1981Google Scholar; Cohn, Bernard, Colonialism and Its Forms of Knowledge: The British in India, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996Google Scholar; Scott, James, Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1999Google Scholar. On the transcendent power of ‘science’ as a ‘sign’ of modern power see Prakash, Gyan, Another Reason: Science and the Imagination of Modern India, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1999CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
10 Administrators classified forecasts as ‘B files’ to be destroyed after seven years. Only a few specimens remain at the National Archives of India (subsequently NAI). Fortunately, the NMLA preserved nearly all IMD forecasts from 1890 until 1971.
11 These associations are made in Locher, Fabien, ‘Les météores de la modernité: La dépression, le télégraphe et la prévision savante du temps (1850–1914)’, Revue d'histoire moderne et contemporaine (2009) 56(4), pp. 77–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
12 Amrith, Sunil, Unruly Waters: How Rains, Rivers, Coasts and Seas Have Shaped Asia's History, New York: Basic Books, 2018, pp. 91–112, 137–44, 262–7Google Scholar.
13 Early twentieth-century ‘long-term’ forecasts issued by the US Weather Bureau speculated on weekly, rather than seasonal weather: Pietruska, Jamie, Looking Forward: Prediction and Uncertainty in Modern America, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2017, pp. 108–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
14 On the history of ‘tropical meteorology’ see, for example, Cushman, Gregory, ‘The imperial politics of hurricane prediction: from Calcutta and Havana to Manila and Galveston, 1839–1900’, in Lawrence, Mark, Bsumek, Erika and Kinkela, David (eds.), Nation-States and the Global Environment, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, pp. 137–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Williamson, Fiona, ‘Weathering the empire: meteorological research in the early British Straits Settlements’, BJHS (2015) 48(3), pp. 475–92CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed; Mahony, Martin, ‘The “genie of the storm”: cyclonic reasoning and the spaces of weather observation in the southern Indian Ocean, 1851–1925’, BJHS (2018) 51(4), pp. 607–33CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.
15 Mahony, Martin and Cagliotti, Angelo Matteo, ‘Relocating meteorology’, History of Meteorology (2017) 8, pp. 1–14Google Scholar. For a sense of the multiple cultures of meteorology at the turn of the twentieth century see Anderson, op. cit. (3); James Rodger Fleming, Vladimir Jankovic and Deborah R. Coen (eds.), Intimate Universalities: Local and Global Themes in the History of Weather and Climate, Sagamore Beach: Science History Publications/USA, 2006; Pietruska, op. cit. (13).
16 Coen, Deborah, Climate in Motion: Science, Empire, and the Problem of Scale, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2018CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
17 See Appadurai, Arjun, ‘Number in the colonial imagination’, in Breckenridge, Carol A. and van der Veer, Peter (eds.), Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament: Perspectives on South Asia, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1993, pp. 314–39Google Scholar; Wilson, Jon, India Conquered: Britain's Raj and the Chaos of Empire, London: Simon & Schuster UK Ltd, 2016Google Scholar.
18 As they explained, it was ‘to some extent compelled to assume the position of a reforming Department … one of its main duties should be to take up and carry into effect such of the proposals of the Famine Commission’. GOI Revenue and Agriculture, Note of the Principal Measures of Administration under Consideration …, Calcutta: Government Printing, 1893, p. 1.
19 The commission was chaired by the formidable Anglo-Indian statesman, and Blanford's personal ally, General Richard Strachey. Report of the Indian Famine Commission, Part I: Famine Relief, London, 1880, pp. 8–9.
20 On India as a ‘natural laboratory’ for meteorology see Anderson, op. cit. (3), pp. 235–84.
21 For diverse characterizations of ‘the monsoon’ see Rajamani, Imke, Perneau, Magrit and Schofield, Katherine Butler (eds.), Monsoon Feelings: A History of Emotions in the Rain, New Delhi: Niyogi Books, 2018Google Scholar; Zimmermann, Francis, ‘Monsoon in traditional culture’, in Fein, Jay S. and Stephens, Pamela L. (eds.), Monsoons, New York: Wiley, 1987, pp. 51–76Google Scholar.
22 The direct transliteration of the word ‘monsoon’ (mānsūn) in the IMD's English–Hindi glossary testifies to the recent introduction of the concept of a synoptic, dynamic phenomenon into north Indian languages. Bharat Mausam Vigyan Vibhag, Mausam Vigyan Shabdavali, 3rd edn, Office of the Director General: New Delhi, 2005 (first published 1980).
23 This summary draws from Charu Singh, ‘Configuring the monsoon: meteorology and famine in colonial India’ (2010), unpublished M.Phil. thesis, Jawaharlal Nehru University.
24 On this terminological difficulty see Simpson, George C., ‘The south-west monsoon’, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society (1921) 47(199), pp. 151–71, 151CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
25 ‘Monsoon prospects’, Times of India, 11 June 1914 (emphasis mine).
26 Anderson, op. cit. (3), pp. 83–130. For a genealogy of the term ‘forecast’ see Walter Friedman, Fortune Tellers: The Story of America's First Economic Forecasters, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. ix–xi.
27 New scholarship is rethinking the fundamental role of ‘the future’ in the functioning of capitalist (and socialist) economies. See Friedman, op. cit. (26); Beckert, Jens, Imagined Futures: Fictional Expectations and Capitalist Dynamics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2016CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pietruska, op. cit. (13).
28 Blanford, op. cit. (5), pp. 21–9.
29 Crop forecasts were produced at the imperial level from at least 1890–1.
30 For an overview of government finances see Kumar, Dharma, ‘The fiscal system’, in Kumar, Dharma and Desai, Meghnad (eds.), Cambridge Economic History of India, c.1751–c.1970, vol. 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008, pp. 905–44Google Scholar.
31 Guy Fleetwood Wilson, ‘Financial statement for 1909–1910’, Gazette of India Extraordinary, 22 March 1909, p. 24.
32 The issue of gambling was a sensitive one for imperial governors, who had enacted controversial anti-rain-betting legislation in Calcutta in 1897. Birla, Ritu, Stages of Capital: Law, Culture, and Market Governance in Late Colonial India, Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2009, pp. 144–98Google Scholar.
33 Guy Fleetwood Wilson, ‘Speech of the honourable Finance Minister introducing the financial statement for 1910–1911’, Gazette of India Extraordinary, 25 February 1910, p. 20.
34 L. Abrahams, ‘Memorandum and supplementary notes on the location and management of the general balances of the GOI …’, in Appendices to the Interim Report of the Commissioners, Royal Commission on Indian Finance and Currency, London: HM's Stationery Office, 1913, vol. 1, pp. 9–10.
35 See Goswami, Manu, Producing India: From Colonial Economy to National Space, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
36 Pietruska, op. cit. (13), p. 3.
37 E.B. Garriott, ‘Long-range weather forecasts’, in Proceedings of the Third Convention of Weather Bureau Officials Held at Peoria, Ill., Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1904, pp. 38–41.
38 David Day, The Weather Watchers: 100 Years of the Bureau of Meteorology, Carlton, Victoria: Melbourne University Publishing, 2007, pp. 17–46. In Habsburg Austria, by contrast, leading atmospheric scientists refused to engage in forecasting. Coen, op. cit. (16), pp. 197–9.
39 Medhora went on to suggest that India's national income forecast would never truly become a useful figure until it could be distinguished from the meteorological one, a feat which could only be achieved through industrial policy. Medhora, Phiroze B., ‘Economic forecasting in India’, Economic and Political Weekly (1970) 5(35), pp. M83–M88, M83Google Scholar.
40 Normand, Charles, ‘Monsoon seasonal forecasting’, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society (1953) 79(342), pp. 463–73, 463CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
41 For an overview of the year-by-year changes in monsoon forecasting methods over this period see P. Jagannathan, Seasonal Forecasting in India: A Review, Poona: Meteorological Office, 1960.
42 Blanford had begun to advance this theory in his 1882–3 administration report. GOI Department of Revenue & Agriculture (Meteorology) (subsequently R&A (Met)), December 1883, File No. 23, British Library, India Office Records (subsequently BLIOR).
43 Blanford worried that data from 1880 did not support his theory, although he ultimately determined it to be ‘an exception that proves the rule’. H.F.B., ‘An Indian weather forecast’, Nature (1883) 29, pp. 77–9.
44 Blanford, Henry F., ‘II. On the connexion of the Himalaya snowfall with dry winds and seasons of drought in India’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (1884) 37, pp. 3–22Google Scholar.
45 John Eliot, ‘The meteorological forecast: to the editor’, The Pioneer, 23 October 1899, p. 6.
46 Eliot, op. cit. (45).
47 Gilbert T. Walker to GOI, 17 October 1904, GOI R&A (Met), January 1905, File No. 91 of 1904, BLIOR. Eliot had trained in mathematics and physics at Cambridge University and campaigned for his successor be a first-class mathematician. Walker, too, studied and lectured at Cambridge before his recruitment.
48 Gilbert Walker to GOI, 1 May 1907, GOI R&A (Met), June 1907, File No. 38, NAI.
49 GOI R&A (Met), January 1907, File No. 122 of 1906, BLIOR.
50 Walker, Gilbert, Statement of Actual Rainfall in June, July, August, and September 1907, Simla: Government Central Branch Press, 1907, pp. 7–8, NMLAGoogle Scholar.
51 Walker's ‘discovery’ of the southern oscillation has attracted scholarly attention. Grove, Richard, ‘The East India Company, the Raj, and the El Niño: the critical role played by colonial scientists in establishing the mechanisms of global climate teleconnections, 1770–1930’, in Grove, Richard, Damodaran, Vinita and Sangwan, Satpal (eds.), Nature and the Orient: The Environmental History of South and Southeast Asia, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998, pp. 301–23Google Scholar; Davis, op. cit. (2), pp. 213–38; George Adamson, ‘The discovery of ENSO’, in Richard Grove and George Adamson (eds.), El Niño in World History, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2017, pp. 107–38.
52 S.K. Banerji, Memorandum Regarding the Probable Amount of Monsoon Rainfall in 1933, Poona, 1933, NMLA.
53 For an account of how British empire enabled the first ‘global’ views of weather see Mahony, Martin, ‘For an empire of “all types of climate”: meteorology as an imperial science’, Journal of Historical Geography (2016) 51, pp. 29–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
54 For a thorough explanation of these mathematical methods see S.R. Savur, ‘The performance test’, Sankhyā (1938) 4(1), pp. 49–52.
55 Normand, op. cit. (40), p. 463.
56 GOI Industries & Labour (Meteorology), 1934, File No. G-680(25), No. 50, NAI. This exchange came at a tense moment for the India Office, as Parliamentary negotiations over the Government of India Act were reaching a conclusion.
57 Here, I focus primarily on coverage in The Pioneer, Amrita Bazar Panjika, Friend of India, and the Times of India, using the digitized databases ProQuest Historical Newspapers, Gale Historical Newspapers and World Newspapers Archive.
58 Editorial, The Pioneer, 10 August 1899, p. 1.
59 Editorial, The Pioneer, 10 June 1899, p. 2; The Pioneer, op. cit. (58).
60 Editorial, The Pioneer, 4 October 1899, p. 1 (emphasis mine).
61 The vast world of indigenous weather forecasting authorities is becoming clearer through new research. Charu Singh has made the most significant contribution in her work on Mithalala Vyasa's ‘Vedic’ Sanskrit scientific treatise Vṛṣṭiprabodha (Rain Knowledge) (1908), subtitled ‘Indian meteorology’. It is notable that Vyasa's astrological writings found a ready audience following the 1899 IMD forecast debacle. Charu Singh, ‘Science, Hindi print, and agricultural improvement in colonial north India’ (2015), unpublished PhD dissertation, Jawaharlal Nehru University.
62 John Eliot, ‘The meteorological forecast: to the editor’, The Pioneer, 23 October 1899, p. 6 (emphasis mine).
63 ‘Meteorology and its critics’, Friend of India & Statesman, 16 November 1899, p. 4.
64 Eliot, op. cit. (62).
65 On the decision to make the forecasts confidential see GOI R&A (Met), July 1902, File No. 65, NAI.
66 Eliot, op. cit. (62).
67 Certain English-language presses published yearly forecasts by Clements between 1902 and 1914. See, for example, ‘Indian weather forecasts: the claims of Mr. Hugh Clements’, Times of India, 30 June 1902, p. 4. Clements solicited funding to come to India in 1909 to demonstrate the efficacy of his lunar techniques, but the government declined. GOI R&A (Met), October 1909, File No. 54, BLIOR.
68 Gieryn, Thomas, Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line, Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1999Google Scholar.
69 ‘Wireless telegraphy and the weather’, Amrita Bazar Patrika, 1 February 1906, p. 4.
70 William Digby, Natural Law in Terrestrial Phenomena: A Study in the Causation of Earthquakes, Volcanic Eruptions, Wind-Storms, Temperature, Rainfall, with a Record of Evidence, London: WM. Hutchinson & Co., 1902.
71 Attention is being paid to the development of particular colonial sciences in South Asia, which make for fruitful comparison. For example, Chakrabarti, Pratik, Bacteriology in British India: Laboratory Medicine and the Tropics, Rochester, NY: University of Rochester Press, 2012Google Scholar; Kumar, Prakash, Indigo Plantations and Science in Colonial India, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2012CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
72 Editorial, Indian Journal of Meteorology & Geophysics (1950) 1(1), pp. 1–3, 3.
73 Banerji, op. cit. (8), pp. 14.
74 Normand, op. cit. (40), pp. 473 (emphasis mine).
75 Gilbert Walker, ‘On long-range forecasting’, in Report of the Conference of Empire Meteorologists, London, August 20–September 3, 1929, London: HM's Stationery Office, 1930, pp. 137–8.
76 In 2005, a team of India's most prominent scientists concluded that their predictions were no more accurate than they had been in 1932. Gadgil, Sulochandra, Rajeevan, M. and Nanjundiah, Ravi, ‘Monsoon prediction: why yet another failure?’, Current Science (2005) 88(9), pp. 1389–400Google Scholar.
77 On ‘tropicality’ as a discourse of ‘difference’ see Arnold, David, The Tropics and the Traveling Gaze: India, Landscape, and Science, Seattle: University of Washington Press, 2006Google Scholar.