Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:13:20.924Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

‘Like a baby with a box of matches’: British scientists and the concept of ‘race’ in the inter-war period

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 August 2005

GAVIN SCHAFFER
Affiliation:
The University of Portsmouth, School of Social, Historical and Literary Studies, Milldam, Burnaby Road, Portsmouth, Hants PO1 3AS, UK. E-mail: Gavin.Schaffer@port.ac.uk.

Abstract

Historians of science have often presented the inter-war period as a time when British scientific communities radically questioned existing scholarship on ‘race’. The ascendancy of genetics, and the perceived need to challenge Nazi ‘racial’ theory have been highlighted as pivotal issues in shaping this British revision of ‘racial’ ideas. This article offers a detailed analysis of British scientific thinking in the inter-war period. It questions whether historians have exaggerated or oversimplified the prevalence of anti-‘racial’ reform. It uses a wide range of scientific writings to consider issues of continuity and change in ‘racial’ thinking in mainstream British scientific communities. The article probes the relationship between science and politics, focusing on the extent to which ideological factors affected both the scientific agenda and conclusions as regards ‘racial’ issues. Far from dismissing the idea that events in the inter-war period triggered changes in the way in which British scientists dealt with ‘race’, the article argues that the seeds of the post-Second World War international scientific rejection of ‘race’ were sown in inter-war Britain amid considerable ambivalence and discord.

We must remember that the investigator, whether a biologist, an economist, or a sociologist, is himself a part of history, and that if he ever forgets he is a part of history he will deceive his audience and deceive himself.J. B. S. Haldane, Heredity and Politics, 1938

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2005 British Society for the History of Science

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like to thank the AHRB for funding this research and the Parkes Centre for Jewish/Non Jewish Studies at the University of Southampton for providing such an excellent environment for study. I am also very grateful for the help of the history team at the University of Portsmouth, C. H. Thatcher, M. A. Liebmann and the editorial team at the BJHS.