Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T11:41:58.104Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

BARNA National Audit on Staffing in the Post Anaesthetic Care Unit – Results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 December 2012

Pat Smedley
Pat Smedley*
Affiliation:
BARNA President
Get access

Abstract

This general audit on staffing the Post Anaesthetic Care Unit (PACU) was commissioned as a result of discussions around staffing held at two British Anaesthetic and Recovery Nurses Association (BARNA) Talks seminars in November 2009 and March 2010. Audit forms were sent to all BARNA members and made available on its website. One hundred audit forms were returned. The audit results clearly indicated that many problems exist in ensuring safe and appropriate staffing in the PACU at all times. The audit results highlighted the need for BARNA to take a lead in promoting information to inform PACU staff planning and to make this information freely available on its website.

Type
Audit Report
Information
British Journal of Anaesthetic & Recovery Nursing , Volume 13 , Issue 3-4 , August 2012 , pp. 48 - 57
Copyright
Copyright © British Association of Anaesthetic and Recovery Nursing 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Association for Perioperative Practitioners (AfPP). Standards Staffing for Patients in the Perioperative Setting Association for Perioperative Practice, 2008.Google Scholar
American Society of Peri-Anesthesia Nurses (2010–2012). Perianesthesia Nursing Standards and Practice Recommendations. Available at: www.aspan.org/clinicalpractice/patientclassification/tabid/4191/default.aspx [Accessed 1 September 2012].Google Scholar
Bishop, J, Llewellyn, L. Delayed discharge audit – paper presented at BARNA conference. British Journal of Anaesthetic and Recovery Nursing, 2012; 13: [online].Google Scholar
British Anaesthetic and Recovery Nurses Association [BARNA]. BARNA Standards of Practice [reviewed 2012]. London: British Anaesthetic and Recovery Nurses Association.Google Scholar
Dexter, Fet al. Strategies to reduce delays in admission into a post anaesthesia care unit from operating rooms. Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing 2005; 20(2): 92–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurst, K. Selecting and Applying Methods for Estimating the Size and Mix of Nursing Teams. A Systematic Review of the Literature Commissioned by the Department of Health. Leeds: Nuffield Institute for Health, 2003.Google Scholar
Iacono, M. Perianesthesia staffing…thinking beyond the numbers. Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing 2006; 21: 346–352.Google Scholar
Jenkins, J. Eliminating common PACU delays. Journal of Healthcare Information Management 2007; 21(2): 53–58.Google Scholar
Kiekkas, Pet al. Nursing activities and use of time in the Post Anaesthesia Care Unit. Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing 2005; 20(5): 311–321.Google Scholar
O'Brien, A, Benger, J. Patient dependency in emergency care: do we have the nurses we need? Journal of Clinical Nursing 2007; 16(11): 2081–2087.Google Scholar
Royal College of Anaesthetists (2009). Royal College of Anaesthetists guidance on the provision of anaesthesia services for Post-operative Care. Available at: http://www.rcoa.ac.uk/docs/GPAS-Post.pdf [Accessed 1 September 2012].Google Scholar
Sheward, Let al. The relationship between UK hospital nurse staffing and emotional exhaustion and job dissatisfaction. Journal of Nursing Management 2005; 13: 51–60.Google Scholar
Smedley, P. Safe staffing in the post anaesthetic care unit: no magic formula. British Journal of Anaesthetic and Recovery Nursing 2010; 11(1): 3–8.Google Scholar
Waters, A, Andalo, D. Mix and Match. Nursing Standard 2003; 18(1): 12–17.Google Scholar