Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T10:43:32.213Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determining the Effective Length of Stay for Post-operative Patients in the PACU through the Location of Influencing Factors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2009

Y. Kol*
Affiliation:
Chief Nurse Executive, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
A. Filhaver
Affiliation:
PACU Charge Nurse, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
S. Shitrit
Affiliation:
Manager of Nursing, Surgical Division, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
L. Rubin
Affiliation:
PACU Deputy Charge Nurse, Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel
Get access

Abstract

Objectives:

(1) Estimating actual post-anaesthesia care units (PACU) length of stay (LOS) for patients after general and regional anaesthesia. (2) Estimating appropriate PACU LOS for patients after general and regional anaesthesia. (3) Measuring the gap between actual and appropriate PACU LOS and identifying the main factors affecting LOS.

Background:

The patient’s post-operative clinical condition, type of anaesthetic and type of surgery dictate post-operative care and monitoring requirements. There is no consensus in the literature regarding the ‘Gold Standard’ for discharging patients from PACU. Some studies focus on PACU LOS as a secondary outcome when comparing different anaesthetic methods and locating factors delaying patient discharge.

Methodology:

This was a prospective study with 580 patients, mainly undergoing planned surgery. The data was gathered from patient records, maintaining anonymity for six months.

Results:

Required LOS following regional anaesthesia was longer than following general anaesthesia. The gap between actual and appropriate LOS was 0.17 hours. The main reason for delay was waiting for transport assistance.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Association of Anaesthetic and Recovery Nursing 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrete, JA, Kroulik, D. A postanesthesia recovery score. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1970; 49 (6): 924934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bothner, U, Georgieff, M, Schwilk, B. The impact of minor perioperative anesthesia – related incidents, events, and complications on postanesthesia care unit utilization. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1999; 89: 506513.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruce, M. A study in time: performance improvement to reduce excess holding time in PACU. Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing 2000; 15 (4): 237244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Imarengiaye, CO, Song, D, Prabhu, AJ, Chung, F. Spinal anesthesia: functional balance is impaired after clinical recovery. Anesthesiology 2003; 98 (2): 511515.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marcon, E, Kharraja, S, Smolski, N, Luquelt, B, Viale, JP. Determining the number of beds in the postanesthesia care unit: a computer simulation flow approach. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2003; 96: 14151423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGrath, B, Chung, F. Postoperative recovery and discharge. Anesthesiology Clinics of North America 2003; 21 (2): 367386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palvin, DJ, Kapp, SE, Polissar, NL. Factors affecting discharge time in adult outpatients. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1998; 87: 816826.Google Scholar
Panagiotis, K, Poulopoulou, M, Papahatzi, A, Panagiotis, S. Is postanesthesia care unit length of stay: increased in hypothermic patients? AORN 2005; 81 (2): 379392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strichartz, GR, Berde, CB. Local anesthetics. In: Miller, RD (ed.). Miller’s Anesthesia (6th edn). Philadelphia: Elsevier, 2005, 573603.Google Scholar
Waddle, J, Evers, AS, Piccirillo, JF. Postanesthesia care unit length of stay: quantifying and assessing dependent factors. Anesthesia and Analgesia 1998; 87: 628633.Google ScholarPubMed