Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T11:25:16.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Going Dutch: Anaesthetising in the Netherlands and Other Issues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2005

D. T. Cowan
D. T. Cowan
Affiliation:
Anaesthetic Department of Anaesthesia, Northwick Park Hospital, Florence Nightingale School of Nursing and Midwifery, King's College, London, UK
Get access

Abstract

This paper discusses the role, responsibilities and practices of anaesthetic practitioners in the Netherlands in relation to their counterparts in the United Kingdom (UK), these practitioners representing an important yet overlooked section of the health care workforce. This takes place in the context of the UK National Health Service (NHS) modernisation agenda and the European Commission's (EC) aim to enhance the mobility of health care staff throughout the European Union (EU) through standardisation of variations in qualifications, skill levels, methods and working practices (Bologna, 1999; Lisbon Strategy, 2000; EHTAN, 2005).

It is clear that significant disparities remain between anaesthetic practitioners in both countries and that we need to explore ways of arriving at compatibility between the different grades. However, this does not currently appear to be happening at EU level. Despite the huge responsibilities on these practitioners, this sector of the EU health care workforce remains largely invisible and there appears to be no concerted attempt at EU level to develop appropriate competencies for them. Further research is required into this area, including: evaluative studies of policies for service redesign and new roles, professional regulation and the impact on outcomes for health service users.

Type
Original Article
Information
British Journal of Anaesthetic & Recovery Nursing , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 32 - 36
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aiken LH, Buchan J, Sochalski J, Nichols B, Powell M. Trends in international migration. Health Affairs 2004; 23 (3): 69–77.Google Scholar
Bologna Process, 1999. www.bologna-berlin2003.de/pdf/Prague_communiquTheta.pdf
Cowan DT. From anaesthetic nurse to nurse anaesthetist: is this possible in the UK? British Journal of Anaesthe-tic and Recovery Nursing 2003; 4: 7–11.Google Scholar
De Raeve P. The free movement of nurses: a win-win situation if based on ethical recruitment guidelines. Eurohealth 2003; 9 (3): 24–26.Google Scholar
European Commission Directive 2001/19/EC. www.legislation.hmso.gov.uk/
European Healthcare Training and Accreditation Network (EHTAN), 2005. www.kcl.ac.uk/nursing/research/ehtan
Lipley N. Waiting in the wings. Nursing Standard 1999; 13 (39): 12.Google Scholar
Leonardo da Vinci, 2005. www.leonardo.org.uk
Lisbon European Council. Lisbon Strategy, 2000. www.europa.eu.int/comm/lisbon_strategy/index_en.html (accessed July 2004).
O'Dowd A, Chatterjee M. Opening our doors to new EU nurses. Nursing Times 2004; 100 (16): 13–23.Google Scholar
Wallace PGM. Reply to Dr Ruxton, Physician and Anaesthetist. Anaesthesia News 2005; 210: 23–24. www.aagbi. org/pdf/A_News_jan05.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wertheim HFL, Vos MC, Boelens HAM, Voss A, Vandenbroucke-Grauls, Meester MHM, Kluytmans JAJW, van Keulen PHJ, Verbrugh HA. Low prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) at hospital admission in the Netherlands: the value of search and destroy and restrictive antibiotic use. Journal of Hospital Infection 2004; 56: 321–325.Google Scholar