Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T10:18:25.358Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Risk Assessment in the Post Anaesthetic Care Unit Using Critical Incident Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2009

Get access

Extract

It is generally accepted that the theatre is a highly technical and complex environment where clinical risks need to be managed effectively to ensure safe practice and to limit liability and litigation. Although anaesthesia and post anaesthesia care has long been the focus of risk management, the potential for errors and adverse events remains high. When errors occur, it is important to analyse the causes, so that preventative measures can be taken and similar incidents do not reoccur. This article sets out to examine and evaluate the process of reflection using a critical incident approach. A model of reflective practice, as suggested by Johns [1996] has been used to structure this paper. A critical incident is described and key issues arising from it are discussed and reflected upon. This incident was chosen because important clinical and risk management issues were highlighted.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © British Association of Anaesthetic and Recovery Nursing 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, I D [1999] Care of the Critically 111 Surgical Patient London: ArnoldGoogle Scholar
Badger, T G [1999] Quality management within a cost–constrained service Journal of Nursing Management 7 [6] 323329Google Scholar
Bassett, C and Makin, L [Eds] [2000] Caring for the Seriously 111 Patient London: ArnoldGoogle Scholar
Campbell, L [2001] Don ′t blame the icebergs British Journal of Perioperative Nursing 11 [3] 119123Google Scholar
Clough, J [1998] Assessing and controlling risk Nursing Standard 12[31] 5052Google Scholar
Fulbrook, S [1995] Duty of care [3] British Journal of Theatre Nursing 5 [7] 3435Google Scholar
Glaze, J [1998] Developing nursing practice through reflection British Journal of Theatre Nursing 7 917Google Scholar
Johns, C [1996] Using a reflective model of nursing and guided reflection Nursing Standard 11 [2] 3438Google Scholar
Meurier, C E [2000] Understanding the nature of errors in nursing: using a model to analyse critical incident reports of errors which had resulted in an adverse or potentially adverse events Journal of Advanced Nursing 32 [1] 202–207Google Scholar
McNeil, B [1999] Clinical governance: the whys, whats and hows for theatre practitioners British Journal of Theatre Nursing 9 [5] 209216Google Scholar
Parley, K and Corrigan, P [1999] Quality Improvement in Healthcare London: Stanley ThornesGoogle Scholar
Lipley, N [2001] Safe landing Nursing Standard 15[34] 1112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reason, J [1995] Chapter 5 Understanding adverse events: Human factors IN Vincent, C A [Ed] [1995] Clinical Risk Management London: BMJ PublishingGoogle Scholar
Starritt, T [1999] Patient assessment in recovery British Journal of Theatre Nursing 9[12] 593595Google Scholar
Wilson, J [1995] Clinical risk management in theatres. Professional practice: Are you a team player? British Journal of Theatre Nursing 4 [11] 57Google Scholar