Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T05:47:34.655Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An investigation into effective string teaching in a variety of learning contexts: a single case study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2007

Evangeline Kai-Wen Cheng  and
Colin Durrant
Evangeline Kai-Wen Cheng
Affiliation:
School of Arts and Humanities, Institute of Education, University of London, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, UKevangelinecheng@gmail.com, C.Durrant@ioe.ac.uk
Colin Durrant
Affiliation:
School of Arts and Humanities, Institute of Education, University of London, 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, UKevangelinecheng@gmail.com, C.Durrant@ioe.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study aims to explore and investigate the factors that contribute to effective instrumental teaching and to understand the interdependence and interactions between these factors. The study obtained data using qualitative research tools from a series of individual and group instrumental teaching observations and a semi-structured interview with an instrumental teacher operating in a variety of teaching contexts. Findings from the study suggest that a great number of factors are required for instrumental teaching and learning to be effective. These factors interweave with each other and form a creative teaching style for the subject. The research indicated that it is helpful for the teachers to focus on pupils' learning processes rather than only on their learning outcomes. When real learning occurs, it is a positive experience for both teachers and pupils with long-term benefits in other areas of learning.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Music Education , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , July 2007 , pp. 191 - 205
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abeles, H., Goffi, J. & LEVASSEUR, S. (1992) ‘The components of effective applied instruction’, The Quarterly Journal of Music Teaching and Learning, 3, 2, 17–23.Google Scholar
AIGEN, K. (1995) ‘Principles of qualitative research’, in Wheeler, B. (Ed), Music Therapy Research: Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives. Phoenixville: Barcelona Publishers.Google Scholar
ATLAS, G., TAGGART, T. & GOODELL, D. (2004) ‘The effects of sensitivity to criticism on motivation and performance in music students’, British Journal of Music Education, 21, 1, 81–7.Google Scholar
BARRY, N. H. (1992) ‘The effects of practice strategies, individual differences in cognitive style, and gender upon technical accuracy and musicality of student instrumental performance’, Psychology of Music, 20, 2, 112–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BISESI, T. & RAPHAEL, T. (1995) ‘Combining single-subject experimental designs with qualitative research’, in Nauman, S. & McCormick, S. (Eds), Single-Subject Experimental Research: Applications for Literacy. Delaware: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
CREECH, A. & HALLAM, S. (2003) ‘Parent–teacher–pupil interactions in instrumental music tuition: a literature review’, British Journal of Music Education, 20, 1, 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DELAMONT, S. (1992) Fieldwork in Educational Settings – Methods, Pitfalls and Perspectives. London: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
DUKE, R. & MADSEN, C. (1991) ‘Proactive versus reactive teaching: focusing observation on specific aspects of instruction’, Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 108, 1–14.Google Scholar
DURRANT, C. (2003) Choral Conducting: Philosophy and Practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
GORMAN, D. (1999) Working with a Violinist: An Account of a Lesson. http://www.learningmethods.com/violin.htmGoogle Scholar
GRANT, J. & DRAFALL, L. (1991) ‘Teacher effectiveness research: a review and comparison’, Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 108, 31–48.Google Scholar
HALLAM, S. (1998) Instrumental Teaching – A Practical Guide to Better Teaching and Learning. Oxford: Heinemann Educational Publishers.Google Scholar
HAMANN, D., LINEBURGH, N. & PAUL, S. (1998) ‘Teaching effectiveness and social skill development’, Journal of Research in Music Education, 46, 1, 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HAMEL, J., DUFOUR, S. & FORTIN, D. (1993) Case Study Methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HOWARD, G. (1996) ‘Kodály strategies for instrumental teachers’, Music Educators’ Journal, March, 27–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JORGENSEN, H. (2001) ‘Instrumental learning: is an early start a key to success?’, British Journal of Music Education, 18, 3, 227–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KRATOCHWILL, T. (1992) ‘Single-case research design and analysis: an overview’, in Kratochwill, T. & Levin, J. (Eds), Single-Case Research Design and Analysis – New Directions for Psychology and Education. New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
MACKWORTH-YOUNG, L. (1990) ‘Pupil-centred learning in piano lessons: an evaluated action-research programme focusing on the psychology of the individual’, Psychology of Music, 18, 73–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MAWER, D. (1999) ‘Bridging the divide: embedding voice-leading analysis in string pedagogy and performance’, British Journal of Music Education, 16, 179–95.Google Scholar
MILLS, J. & SMITH, J. (2003) ‘Teachers’ beliefs about effective instrumental teaching in schools and higher education’, British Journal of Music Education, 21, 5–27.Google Scholar
McPHERSON, G. & McCORMICK, J. (2000) ‘The contribution of motivational factors to instrumental performance in a music examination’, Research Studies in Music Education, 15, 31–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NELSON, S. (1985) ‘The Tower Hamlets Project’, British Journal of Music Education, 2, 69–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NEUMAN, W. L. (2003) Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
NIELSEN, S. (1999) ‘Learning strategies in instrumental music practice’, British Journal of Music Education, 16, 275–91.Google Scholar
O'NEILL, S. & SLOBODA, J. (1997) ‘The effects of failure on children's ability to perform a musical test’, Psychology of Music, 25, 18–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PITTS, S., DAVIDSON, J. & McPHERSON, G. (2000) ‘Developing effective practise strategies: case studies of three young instrumentalists’, Music Education Research, 2, 1, 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
REID, A. (2001) ‘Variation in the ways that instrumental and vocal students experience learning music’, Music Education Research, 3, 1, 25–40.Google Scholar
RIFE, N., SHNEK, Z., LAUBY, J. & LAPIDUS, L. (2001) ‘Children's satisfaction with private music lessons’, Journal of Research in Music Education, 49, 1, 21–32.Google Scholar
ROSTVALL, A. & WEST, T. (2003) ‘Analysis of interaction and learning in instrumental teaching’, Music Education Research, 5, 3, 213–26.Google Scholar
SCHMIDT, M. (1998) ‘Defining ‘good’ music teaching: four student teachers’ beliefs and practices’, Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 138, 19–46.Google Scholar
THOMPSON, K. (1984) ‘An analysis of group instrumental teaching’, British Journal of Music Education, 1, 2, 153–71.Google Scholar
THURMAN, L. & WELCH, G. (Eds) (2000) Bodymind and Voice: Foundations of Voice Education. Minneapolis, MN: The VoiceCare Network.Google Scholar
TRAVERS, M. (2001) Qualitative Research Through Case Studies. London: SAGE Publications.Google Scholar
TSCHANNEN-MORAN, M., HOY, A. & HOY, W. (1998) ‘Teacher efficacy: its meaning and measure’, Review of Educational Research, 68, 2, 202–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
YARBROUGH, C. & PRICE, H. (1989) ‘Sequential patterns of instruction in music’, Journal of Research in Music Education, 37, 3, 179–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar