Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T07:16:18.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Professional collaboration in the Wider Opportunities instrumental programme

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 November 2018

Ann Barbara Johnstone*
Affiliation:
2 The Dell, Bexley, Kent. DA5 2AG Corresponding author. Email: b.a.johnstone@btinternet.com

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a study (Johnstone, 2016) which investigated the nature of professional collaboration between the visiting instrumental teacher and the primary school class teacher in the Wider Opportunities instrumental programme. The potential for exchanging knowledge appears to be significant when the visiting instrumental teacher is regarded as an expert in music and the class teacher as an expert in pedagogy. The analysis was influenced by underpinning theoretical perspectives based on professional collaboration (Whittington, 2003b; Hartas, 2004; Evans, 2011) and showed impoverished collaboration, even though some teachers wished for closer involvement. The unique nature of the study and its findings highlighted critical issues related to the necessity for discussions and sharing expertise between teachers, and the need for clearer communication between the local music education hub and the schools.

Type
Articles
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BAMFORD, A. & GLINKOWSKI, P. (2010) Wow, It's Music Next. Impact Evaluation of Wider Opportunities Programme in Music at Key Stage 2. Full Report. Leeds: Federation of Music Services. (FMS) www.thefms.org (accessed 17/12/2011).Google Scholar
BEDFORD, D., JACKSON, C. R. & WILSON, E. (2008) New partnerships for learning: Teachers’ perspectives on their developing professional relationships with teaching assistants in England. Journal of In-Service Education, 34 (1), 725.Google Scholar
BIOTT, C. & EASEN, P. (1994) Collaborative Learning in Staffrooms and Classrooms. London: David Fulton.Google Scholar
BRAUN, V. & CLARKE, V. (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2) 77101. ISSN Google Scholar
BRAUN, V. & CLARKE, V. (2012) Thematic analysis. In Cooper, H. (ed.), APA Handbook of Research Methods in Psychology. Vol 2: Research Design. American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
BRITISH EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ASSOCIATION (BERA) (2011) Ethical Guidelines for Educational Research. London: British Educational Research Association.Google Scholar
BUBB, S. & EARLEY, P. (2007) Leading and Managing Continuing Professional Development (2nd edn.) London: Paul Chapman Publishing.Google Scholar
BURT, R. (2011) A Collaborative approach to planning, teaching and learning. In Beach, N., Evans, J., & Spruce, G. (eds.), Making Music in the Primary School. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
COHEN, L., MANION, L. & MORRISON, K. (2007) Research Methods in Education (6th edn.) Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
DALKIR, K. (2011) Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice (2nd edn.) Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION (DfE) (2011) The Importance of Music. A National Plan for Music Education. London: DfE.Google Scholar
DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION & SKILLS (DfES) (2001) Schools Achieving Success. Nottingham: DfES.Google Scholar
DEPARTMENT FOR EDUCATION & SKILLS (DfES) (2006) Instrumental and Vocal Tuition at Key Stage 2. Making it Work in Your School. Nottingham:DfESGoogle Scholar
EVANS, J. (2011) Collaboration: Setting the scene. In Beach, N., Evans, J. & Spruce, G. (eds.), Making Music in the Primary School. Whole Class Instrumental and Vocal Teaching. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
FAUTLEY, M. (2011) The Wider Opportunities Programme in Birmingham Schools. Initial Findings. Unpublished Report. Birmingham City University, Centre for Research in Education.Google Scholar
FIELDING, M., BRAGG, S., CRAIG, J., CUNNINGHAM, I., ERAUT, M., GILLINSON, S., HORNE, M., ROBINSON, C. & THORP, J. (2005) Factors Influencing the Transfer of Good Practice. University of Sussex & Demos. Department for Education and Skills. Research Report RR615.Google Scholar
FITZGERALD, D & KAY, J. (2008) Working Together in Children's Services. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
GASPER, M. (2010) Multi-Agency Working in the Early Years. Challenges and Opportunities. London: Sage.Google Scholar
HALLAM, R. (2011) Effective partnership working in music education: Principles and practice. International Journal of Music Education, 29 (2), Sage publications.Google Scholar
HALLAM, S & ROGERS, K. (2016) The impact of instrumental music learning on attainment at age 16: A pilot study. British Journal of Music Education, 33 (3), 247261.Google Scholar
HANDSCOMB, G. (2007) Collaboration and enquiry: Sharing practice. In Bubb, S. & Earley, P.. Leading and Managing Continuing Professional Development (2nd edn.) London: Paul Chapman Publishing.Google Scholar
HARTAS, D. (2004) Teacher and speech-language therapist collaboration: Being equal and achieving a common goal? Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 20 (1), 3354.Google Scholar
HENLEY, D. (2011) Music Education in England. A Review by Darren Henley for the Department for Education and the Department for Culture, Media and Sport. London: DfE.Google Scholar
HOWITT, D. & CRAMER, D. (2011) Introduction to Research Methods in Psychology (3rd edn.) Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education Ltd.Google Scholar
HUXHAM, C. & VANGEN, S. (2005) Managing to Collaborate. The Theory and Practice of Collaborative Advantage. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
JOHNSTONE, B. A. (2016) Teachers Working Together in the Wider Opportunities Instrumental Programme in the Primary School. Unpublished Doctorate in Education (EdD) thesis. University of Greenwich.Google Scholar
LAMONT, A., DAUBNEY, A. & SPRUCE, G. (2012) Singing in primary schools: Case studies of good practice in whole class vocal tuition. British Journal of Music Education, 29 (2), 251268.Google Scholar
LAVE, J. & WENGER, E. (1991) Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
LEATHARD, A. (2003) Introduction. In Leathard, A. (ed.), Interprofessional Collaboration. From Policy to Practice in Health and Social Care. Hove, East Sussex: Brunner–RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
MAYNARD, T. (2001) The student teacher and the school community of practice. A consideration of ‘learning as participation’. Cambridge Journal of Education, 31 (1), 3952.Google Scholar
MEADS, G. & BARR, H. (2005) Learning together. In Meads, G. & Ashcroft, J. with Barr, H., Scott, R. & Wild, A., The Case for Interprofessional Collaboration in Health and Social Care. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
MILES, M. B. & HUBERMAN, A. M. (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd edn.) Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.Google Scholar
OFFICE FOR STANDARDS IN EDUCATION (OFSTED). (2004) Tuning In: Wider Opportunities in Specialist Instrumental Tuition for Pupils in Key Stage 2. An Evaluation of Pilot Programmes in 12 Local Education Authorities. London: Ofsted.Google Scholar
OFFICE FOR STANDARDS IN EDUCATION (OFSTED). (2009) Making More of Music. An Evaluation of Music in Schools 2005–08. London: Ofsted. Reference no.080235Google Scholar
OFFICE FOR STANDARDS IN EDUCATION (OFSTED). (2012) Music in Schools: Wider Still, and Wider. Quality and Inequality in Music Education 2008–11. Manchester: Ofsted. Reference no. 110158.Google Scholar
PALMER, T., EVANS, J & SPRUCE, G. (2011) Collaborative music teaching and learning. In Beach, N., Evans, J. & Spruce, G., Making Music in the Primary School. Abingdon, Oxon: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
PRITCHARD, A & WOOLLARD, J. (2010) Constructivism and Social Learning. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
SKYRME, D. J. (1999) Knowledge Networking. Collaborative Enterprise. Oxford: Butterworth–Heinemann.Google Scholar
THOMAS, G. (2011) How to do your Case Study. A Guide for Students and Researchers. London: SageGoogle Scholar
TRINITY GUILDHALL & THE OPEN UNIVERSITY. (2009) KS2 Music CPD Programme Team Autumn 2009. www.ks2music.org.uk, www.trinitycollege.com (accessed 31/10/2011).Google Scholar
TRINITY GUILDHALL & THE OPEN UNIVERSITY (2011) KS2 Music CPD Programme. What is Wider Opportunities? www.ks2music.org.uk, www.trinitycollege.com (accessed 31/10/11).Google Scholar
WENGER, E. (1998) Communities of Practice. Learning, Meaning and Identity. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
WENGER, E., MCDERMOTT, R. & SNYDER, W. M. (2002) Cultivating Communities of Practice. A Guide to Managing Knowledge. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
WHITTINGTON, C. (2003a) Collaboration and partnership in context. In Weinstein, J., Whittington, C. & Leiba, T., Collaboration in Social Work Practice. London: Jessica Kingley Publishers.Google Scholar
WHITTINGTON, C. (2003b) A model of collaboration. In Weinstein, J., Whittington, C. & Leiba, T., Collaboration in Social Work Practice. London: Jessica Kingley Publishers.Google Scholar
ZESERSON, K. (2012) Partnerships in music education. So – who is the teacher? In Philpott, C. & Spruce, G. (eds.), Debates in Music Teaching. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar