Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T01:00:35.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Round and round we go: an ‘action’ ride on the rehearsing and performing cycle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2012

Mark Pulman
Mark Pulman*
Affiliation:
University of Huddersfield, University Campus Barnsley, Church Street Barnsley, S70 2AN, UKm.pulman@hud.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article discusses the use of action research cycles on a course involving groupwork rehearsing and performance. The aim was to explore various pedagogic aspects of the activities and improve tutor practice. This account of four action research spirals, taking place over a 10-year period of rehearsing and performing, considers their management and operation including activities, interventions, data collection, reflection and re-planning. Conducting action research spirals of this length can raise issues about combining the roles of tutor and researcher, balancing action and reflection, and managing an extensive and varied data corpus. Employing several cycles in an action research inquiry however, allows the retracing of previous interventions, and a fine-tuning of the process. A spiral of cycles, incorporating interventions, together with informal and structured reflection, can be effective in improving practice and adding strength and depth to the inquiry. This study also offers a contribution towards filling the gap in the literature on lengthy cyclical action research studies.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Music Education , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , July 2012 , pp. 213 - 231
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

AL-QURA'N, M., HAIKAL, M., REZEQ, M., SHALABI, N., FATHI, S. & GHOUSH, S. (2001) The development and implementation of a sixth grade geology unit through collaborative action research. Educational Action Research, 9, 395–411.Google Scholar
BASKERVILLE, R. & PRIES-HEJE, J. (1999) Grounded action research: a method for understanding IT in practice. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 9, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BOWL, M., COOKE, S. & HOCKINGS, C. (2008) Researching across boundaries and borders: the challenges for research. Educational Action Research, 16, 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BOYATZIS, R. (1998) Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
BROWN, S., Ed. (1998) Peer Assessment in Practice. Birmingham: Staff and Educational Development Association.Google Scholar
BRUNER, J. (1983) Child's Talk. Learning to Use Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
CAIN, T. (2008) The characteristics of action research in music education. British Journal of Music Education, 25, 283–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CAIN, T. (2010) Music teachers’ action research and the development of Big K knowledge. International Journal of Music Education, 28, 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CARR, W. & KEMMIS, S. (1986) Becoming Critical: Education, Knowledge and Action Research. Philadelphia: The Falmer Press.Google Scholar
CHARMAZ, K. (2000) Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In Denzin, K. & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 509–536). CA: Sage.Google Scholar
CHARMAZ, K. (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
CONWAY, C. M. & BORST, J. (2001) Action research in music education. Applications of Research in Music Education, 19 (2), 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ELLIOTT, J. (2009) Building educational theory through action research. In Noffke, S. & Somekh, B. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Educational Action Research (pp. 28–38). London: Sage.Google Scholar
GALLAS, K. (1998) Sometimes I Can Be Anything: Power, Gender and Identity in a Primary School Classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
GORARD, S. & TAYLOR, C. (2004) Combining Methods in Social and Educational Research. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
GREEN, L. (2002) How Popular Musicians Learn: A Way Ahead for Music Education. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
GUBA, E. & LINCOLN, Y. (1994) Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In Denzin, N. & Lincoln, Y. (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 485–499). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
HEALE, G. (2003) Applying theory to practice: an action research resource pack for professionals. Clinical Chiropractic, 6, 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KEMBER, D., LEUNG, D., JONES, A., YUEN LOKE, A., McKAY, J., SINCLAIR, K., TSE, H., WEBB, C., WONG, M. & YEUNG, E. (2000) Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 25, 381–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LEWIN, K. (1946) Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2 (4), 34–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDONOUGH, J. & McDONOUGH, S. (1997) Research Methods for English language teachers. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
McNIFF, J. (1988) Action Research: Principles and Practice. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNIFF, J., LOMAX, P. & WHITEHEAD, J. (1996) You and Your Action Research Project. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNIFF, J. & WHITEHEAD, J. (2006) All You Need to Know About Action Research. London: Sage.Google Scholar
NORTON, L. (2009) Action Research in Teaching and Learning. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'BRIEN, N. & MOULES, T. (2007) So round the spiral again: a reflective participatory research project with children and young people. Educational Action Research, 15, 385–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'SULLIVAN, M. (2002) Action research and the transfer of reflective approaches to in-service education and training (INSET) for unqualified and underqualified primary teachers in Namibia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 523–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PULMAN, M. (2008) Knowing Yourself Through Others: Peer Assessment in Popular Music. Unpublished PhD Thesis. Sheffield Hallam University.Google Scholar
PULMAN, M. (2009) Seeing yourself as others see you: developing personal attributes in the group rehearsal. British Journal of Music Education, 26, 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
REIS-JORGE, J. (2007) Teachers’ conceptions of teacher-research and self-perceptions as enquiring practitioners – a longitudinal case study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 402–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ROBSON, C. (2002) Real World Research. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
SHARP, S. (2006) Deriving individual student marks: a tutor's assessment of group work. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 31, 329–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SOMEKH, B. (2006) Action Research: A Methodology for Change and Development. Maidenhead: Open University Press.Google Scholar
SOMEKH, B. & ZEICHNER, K. (2009) Action research for educational reform: remodelling action research theories and practice in local contexts. Educational Action Research, 17, 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VYGOTSKY, L. (1978) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
WADSWORTH, Y. (1997) Everyday Evaluation on the Run. Australia: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
WALLACE, M. (1991) Training Foreign Language Teachers. A Reflective Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
WALLACE, M. (1998) Action Research for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar