Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T05:42:05.240Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Student-chosen criteria for peer assessment of tertiary rock groups in rehearsal and performance: what's important?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

Diana Blom  and
John Encarnacao
Diana Blom*
Affiliation:
Music, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australiad.blom@uws.edu.au, j.encarnacao@uws.edu.au
John Encarnacao
Affiliation:
Music, University of Western Sydney, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australiad.blom@uws.edu.au, j.encarnacao@uws.edu.au
*
Correspondence to Diana Blom.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The study investigates criteria chosen by music students for peer and self assessment of both the rehearsal process and performance outcome of their rock groups. The student-chosen criteria and their explanations of these criteria were analysed in relation to Birkett's skills taxonomy of ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ skills. In the rehearsal process, students placed an emphasis on ‘soft’ skill issues, and in the performance outcome, on ‘hard’ skill issues. For students and staff, challenges raised include understanding how and whether to assess ‘soft’ skills; that there is a continuum of ‘soft’ and ‘hard’ skills rather than a binary; and ensuring clear understanding of criteria terms.

Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Music Education , Volume 29 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 25 - 43
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BLOM, D. (2008) Teaching class-based music performance at tertiary level: focusing theory on practice. In Bennett, D. & Hannan, M. (Eds), Inside, Outside, Downside Up: Conservatoire Training and Musicians’ Work (pp. 101–109). Perth, Australia: Black Swan.Google Scholar
BLOM, D. & POOLE, K. (2004) Peer assessment of tertiary music performance: opportunities for understanding performance assessment and performing through experience and self-reflection. British Journal of Music Education, 21, 111–125.Google Scholar
BRESLER, L. (2002) Out of the trenches: the joys (and risks) of cross-disciplinary collaborations. In Espeland, M. (Ed.), Focus Areas Report – Samspel – ISME 2002 (pp. 53–77). Bergen, Norway: International Society of Music Education (ISME).Google Scholar
BURRACK, F. (2002) Enhanced assessment in instrumental programs. Music Educators Journal, 88 (6), 27–32.Google Scholar
COLL, R. K. & ZEGWAARD, K. E. (2006) Perceptions of desirable graduate competencies for science and technology new graduates. Research in Science & Technological Education, 24 (1), 29–58.Google Scholar
DAVIDSON, J. W. & KING, E. C. (2004) Strategies for ensemble practice. In Williamon, A. (Ed.), Musical Excellence – Strategies and Techniques to Enhance Performance (pp. 105–122). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
FLICK, U. (2002) An Introduction to Qualitative Research (2nd edition). London: Sage.Google Scholar
FORGAS, J. P. (1985) Interpersonal Behaviour: The Psychology of Social Interaction. Sydney & Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
GOODMAN, E. (2002) Ensemble performance. In Rink, J. (Ed.), Musical Performance – A Guide to Understanding (pp. 152–167). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
GREEN, L. (2002) How Popular Musicians Learn: A Way Ahead for Music Education. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
HUNTER, D. & RUSS, M. (1996) Peer assessment in performance studies. British Journal of Music Education, 13, 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
KARLSEN, S. (2010) BoomTown Music Education and the need for authenticity – informal learning put into practice in Swedish post-compulsory music education. British Journal of Music Education, 27, 35–46.Google Scholar
KOKOTSAKI, D. (2007) Understanding the ensemble pianist: a theoretical framework. Psychology of Music, 35, 641–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LATUKEFU, L. (2009) Peer learning and reflection: strategies developed by vocal students in a transforming tertiary setting. International Journal of Music Education, 27, 124–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LEBLER, D. (2007) Student-as-master? Reflections on a learning innovation in popular music pedagogy. International Journal of Music Education, 25, 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LOCKETT, D. (1996) Assessing performance – descriptive criteria. In Nightingale, P., Te Wiata, I., Toohey, S., Ryan, G., Hughes, C. & Magin, D. (Eds.), Assessing Learning in Universities, (pp. 190–197). Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.Google Scholar
MCPHERSON, G. E. & THOMPSON, W. F. (1998) Assessing music performance: issues and influences. Research Studies in Music Education, 10, 12–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PRICE, H. E. & BYO, J. L. (2002) Rehearsing and conducting. In Parncutt, R. & McPherson, G. E. (Eds.), The Science & Psychology of Music Performance – Creative Strategies for Teaching and Learning (pp. 335–351). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PULMAN, M. (2009) Seeing yourself as others see you: developing personal attributes in the group rehearsal. British Journal of Music Education, 26, 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RYAN, D. (2004) Peer assessment in musical performance: the development, trial and evaluation of a methodology for the Australian tertiary environment. British Journal of Music Education, 21, 89–110.Google Scholar
SEARBY, M. & EWERS, T. (1997) An evaluation of the use of peer assessment in higher education: a case study in the School of Music, Kingston University. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 22, 371–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
STANLEY, M., BROOKER, R. & GILBERT, R. (2002) Examiner perceptions of using criteria in music performance assessment. Research Studies in Music Education, 18, 43–52.Google Scholar
THOMAS, A. & MILLARD, B. (2006) Towards enhancing student learning and examiner reliability with criterion-referenced assessment in the creative arts: the case of music. In Shortland-Jones, B. (Ed.), Enhancing Student Learning: 2006 Evaluations and Assessment Conference Refereed Papers (pp. 129–135). Perth: Curtin University of Technology.Google Scholar
YOUNG, V. M. & COLMAN, A. M. (1979) Some psychological processes in string quartets. Psychology of Music, 7, 12–18.Google Scholar