Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T14:14:12.837Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Addition of pearl barley to a rice-based diet for newly weaned piglets increases the viscosity of the intestinal contents, reduces starch digestibility and exacerbates post-weaning colibacillosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Deborah E. Hopwood ,
David W. Pethick ,
John R. Pluske  and
David J. Hampson
Deborah E. Hopwood
Affiliation:
Animal Resources Centre, Murdoch Drive, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia
David W. Pethick
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia
John R. Pluske
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia
David J. Hampson*
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary and Biomedical Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia 6150, Australia
*
*Corresponding author: fax +61 8 9310 4144, Email d.hampson@murdoch.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The purposes of the present study were to investigate the effects of feeding a cereal grain containing NSP on body growth and the intestinal microenvironment of recently weaned pigs, and to examine resultant associations with pathogenic Escherichia coli in the intestinal tract. In Expt 1, pearl barley, a grain rich in soluble NSP, was incorporated (250, 500 or 750 g/kg diet) into a low-fibre control diet based on cooked white rice and fed for 7–10 d following weaning. Consumption of pearl barley did not significantly alter piglet live-weight gain compared with the control cooked rice diet, but it accelerated large intestinal growth and fermentation, decreased ileal starch digestibility and increased intestinal viscosity. Expt 2 was conducted to determine whether these differences would favour proliferation of enterotoxigenic E. coli, the bacterium causing post-weaning colibacillosis (PWC). Three groups of pigs were weaned onto diets based on cooked white rice, rice with 500 g pearl barley/kg, or rice with 500 g pearl barley/kg supplemented with exogenous enzymes (Porzyme(tm) 8100; Danisco, Marlborough, Wilts., UK). Pigs were inoculated orally with haemolytic E. coli serovar O8;K87;K88 after weaning. Animals eating the pearl barley had increased viscosity of the intestinal contents, greater intestinal colonisation with the E. coli strain and more diarrhoea than pigs fed the rice-only diet. The enzymes did not reduce viscosity or protect from PWC. The results suggest that pearl barley alters the intestinal microenvironment and predisposes to PWC, whilst a low-viscosity, highly digestible diet based on cooked white rice is protective.

Keywords

Pearl barleyNon-starch polysaccharidesIntestinal viscosityDiarrhoeaEscherichia coliWeaner pigs
Type
Research Article
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 92 , Issue 3 , September 2004 , pp. 419 - 427
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2004

References

Argenzio, RA, Moon, HW, Kemeny, LJ & Whipp, SCColonic compensation in transmissible gastroenteritis of swine. Gastroenterology (1984) 86, 1501–1509.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bach Knudsen, KE, Borgjensen, B & Andersen, JOGastrointestinal implications in pigs of wheat and oat fractions 2. Microbial activity in the gastrointestinal tract. Br J Nutr (1991) 65, 233–248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bach Knudsen, KE & Hansen, IGastrointestinal implications in pigs of wheat and oat fractions 1. Digestibility and bulking properties of polysaccharides and other major constituents. Br J Nutr (1991) 65, 217–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bedford, MR, Patience, JF, Classen, HL & Inborr, JThe effect of dietary enzyme supplementation of rye-and barley-based diets on digestion and subsequent performance in weanling pigs. Can J Anim Sci (1992) 72, 97–105.Google Scholar
Bedford, MR & Schultze, HExogenous enzymes for pigs and poultry. Nutr Res Rev (1998) 11, 91–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bertschinger, HU & Eggenberger, EEvaluation of low nutrient, high fibre diets for the prevention of porcine Escherichia coli enterotoxaemia. Vet Microbiol (1978) 3, 281–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhatty, RSNonmalting uses of barley Barley: In Barley:Chemistry and Technology, 355–402 [MacGregor, AWandBhatty, RS, editors]. St Paul, MO: American Association of Cereal Chemists, Inc. (1993)Google Scholar
Brown, NJ, Worlding, J, Rumsey, RDE & Read, NWThe effect of guar gum on the distribution of a radiolabelled meal in the gastrointestinal tract of the rat. Br J Nutr (1988) 59, 223–231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolduan, G, Jung, H, Schnabel, E & Schneider, RRecent advances in the nutrition of weaner piglets. Pig News Info (1988) 9, 381–385.Google Scholar
Campbell, RG, Taverner, MR & Mullaney, PDThe effect of dietary concentrations of digestible energy on the performance and carcass characteristics of early-weaned pigs. Anim Prod (1975) 21, 285–294.Google Scholar
Cherbut, C, Albina, E, Champ, M, Coublier, JL & Lecannu, GAction of guar gums on the viscosity of digestive contents and on the gastrointestinal motor function in pigs. Digestion (1990) 46, 205–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Choct, M & Annison, GAnti-nutritive effect of wheat pentosans in broiler chickens: roles of viscosity and gut microflora. Br Poult Sci (1992) 33, 821–834.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crump, MH, Argenzio, RA & Whipp, SCEffects of acetate on absorption of solute and water from the pig colon. Am J Vet Res (1980) 41, 1565–1568.Google ScholarPubMed
Dierick, NA & Decuypere, JAEnzymes and growth in pigs. In Principles of Pig Science, 169–195 [Cole, DJA, Wiseman, JandVarley, MA, editors]. Nottingham: Nottingham University Press. (1994)Google Scholar
Dierick, NA & Decuypere, JAMode of action of exogenous enzymes in growing pig nutrition. Pig News Info (1996) 17, 41N–48N.Google Scholar
Diez-Gonzalez, F, Callaway, TR, Kizoulis, MG & Russell, JBGrain feeding and the dissemination of acid-resistant Escherichia coli from cattle. Science (1998) 281, 1666–1668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dritz, SS, Goodband, RD, Nelssen, Jl, Tokach, MD & Kerr, CAComparison of carbohydrate sources for the early weaned pig. J Anim Sci (1994) 72, Suppl 2 132.Google Scholar
Durmic, Z, Pethick, DW, Mullan, BP, Accioly, JM, Schulze, H & Hampson, DJEvaluation of large-intestinal parameters designed to reduce the occurrence of swine dysentery. Br J Nutr (2002) 88, 159–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Durmic, Z, Pethick, DW, Pluske, JR & Hampson, DJChanges in bacterial populations in the colon of pigs fed different sources of dietary fibre, and the development of swine dysentery after experimental infection. J Appl Microbiol (1998) 85, 574–582.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Efird, RC, Armstrong, WD & Herman, DLThe development of digestive capacity in young pigs: effects of age and weaning system. J Anim Sci (1982) 55, 1380–1387.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Francis, DHEnterotoxigenic Esherichia coli infections in pigs and its diagnosis. J Swine Health Prod (2002) 10, 171–175.Google Scholar
Gill, BP, Mellange, J & Rooke, Growth performance and apparent nutrient digestibility in weaned piglets offered wheat-, barley- or sugar-beet pulp-based diets supplemented with food enzymes. Anim Sci (2000) 70, 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampson, DJPostweaning Esherichia coli in pigs. In Escherichia coli in Domestic Animals and Humans, 171–191. [Gyles, CL, editors]. Wallingford: CAB International. (1994)Google Scholar
Hampson, DJ, Robertson, ID, La, T, Oxberry, SL & Pethick, DWInfluences of diet and vaccination on colonisation of pigs with the intestinal spirochaete Brachyspira (Serpulina) pilosicoli. Vet Microbiol (2000) 73, 75–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hopwood, DE, Pethick, DW & Hampson, DJIncreasing the viscosity of the intestinal contents stimulates proliferation of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and Brachyspira pilosicoli in weaner pigs. Br J Nutr (2002) 88, 523–532.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, BB & Jorgensen, HEffect of dietary fiber on microbial activity and microbial gas production in various regions of the gastrointestinal tract of pigs. Appl Environ Microbiol (1994) 60, 1897–1904.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Longland, AC, Carruthers, J & Low, AGThe ability of piglets 4 to 8 weeks old to digest and perform on diets containing two contrasting sources of non-starch polysaccharide. Anim Prod (1994) 58, 405–410.Google Scholar
McDonald, DE, Pethick, DW, Mullan, BP & Hampson, DJIncreasing viscosity of the intestinal contents alters small intestinal structure and intestinal growth, and stimulates proliferation of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli in newly-weaned pigs. Br J Nutr (2001) 86, 487–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, DE, Pethick, DW, Pluske, JR & Hampson, DJAdverse effects of soluble non-starch polysaccharide (guar gum) on piglet growth and experimental colibacillosis im67mediately after weaning. Res Vet Sci (1999) 67, 245–250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Research Council Nutrient Requirements of Domestic Animals, No. 2, Nutrient Requirements of Swine. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. (1988)Google Scholar
Partridge, GRIn-feed enzymes and antibodies. Pig Vet J (1993) 31, 34–50.Google Scholar
Pluske, JRPsychological and nutritional stress in pigs at weaning: production parameters, the stress response, and histology and biochemistry of the small intestine. PhD Thesis, University of Western Australia. (1993)Google Scholar
Pluske, JR, Durmic, Z, Pethick, DW, Mullan, BP & Hampson, DJConfirmation of the role of rapidly fermentable carbohydrates in the expression of swine dysentery in pigs after experimental infection. J Nutr (1998) 128, 1737–1744.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pluske, JR, Pethick, DW, Durmic, Z, McDonald, DE, Mullan, BP & Hampson, DJDiseases and conditions in pigs, horses and chickens arising from incomplete digestion and absorption of carbohydrates. InRecent Advances in Animal Nutrition in Australia '97, 33–53.[Corbett, JL, Choct, M, Nolan, JVandRowe, JB, editors]. University of New England, Armidale: Department of Animal Science. (1997)Google Scholar
Pluske, JR, Siba, PM, Pethick, DW, Durmic, A, Mullan, BP & Hampson, DJThe incidence of swine dysentery in pigs can be reduced by feeding diets that limit the amount of fermentable substrate entering the large intestine. J Nutr (1996) 126, 2920–2933.Google ScholarPubMed
Prohaszka, L & Baron, F (1980) The predisposing role of high protein supplies in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli infections in weaned pigs. Zbl Vet Med B 27, 222–232.Google ScholarPubMed
Siba, PM, Pethick, DW & Hampson, DJPigs experimentally infected with Serpulina hyodysenteriae can be protected from developing swine dysentery by feeding them a highly digestible diet. Epidemiol Infect (1996) 116, 207–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, HW & Halls, SThe production of oedema disease and diarrhoea in weaned pigs by the oral administration of Escherichia coli: factors that influence the course of the experimental disease. J Med Microbiol (1968) 1, 45–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spiller, GA (1993) CRC Handbook of Dietary Fiber and Human Nutrition. Boca Raton FL: CRC Press, Inc.Google Scholar
van Beers-Schreurs HMG (1996) The changes in the function of the large intestine of weaned pigs. PhD Thesis University of Utrecht.Google Scholar
van Beers-Schreurs, HMG, Nabuurs, MJA, Vellenga, L, Wensing, T & Breukink, HJRole of the large intestine in the pathogenesis of diarrhoea in weaned pigs. Am J Vet Res (1998) 59, 696–703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed