Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:34:04.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Australia’s nutrition transition 1961-2009: a focus on fats - CORRIGENDUM

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2015

Shaan S. Naughton ,
Michael L. Mathai ,
Deanne H. Hryciw  and
Andrew J. McAinch
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content. As you have access to this content, full HTML content is provided on this page. A PDF of this content is also available in through the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Type
Erratum/Corrigendum
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 114 , Issue 6 , 28 September 2015 , pp. 997
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2015 

(First published online 30 June 2015)

doi:10.1017/S0007114515001907, Published by Cambridge University Press June 2015

The figure legend for Linoleic acid content in animal products (Fig. 4) in the paper by Naughton et al. ( Reference Naughton, Mathai and Hryciw 1 ) was incorrectly labelled. It should have had poultry consumption highlighted with a grey coloured triangle rather than a black triangle to avoid confusion with milk consumption. Corrected figure is displayed below.

Fig. 4. Animal product linoleic acid content. Major animal source linoleic acid availability expressed as average annual g/d per capita of linoleic acid for the period 1961-2009. , eggs; , pork; , poultry; , milk; , lamb; , beef.

References

1. Naughton, SS, Mathai, ML, Hryciw, DH, et al. (2015) Australia’s nutrition transition 1961-2009: a focus on fats. Br J Nutr, 1–10.Google ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 4. Animal product linoleic acid content. Major animal source linoleic acid availability expressed as average annual g/d per capita of linoleic acid for the period 1961-2009. , eggs; , pork; , poultry; , milk; , lamb; , beef.