Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:22:54.542Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Breath hydrogen after ingestion of the bulk sweeteners sorbitol, isomalt and sucrose in chocolate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Adam Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Salford, Tlie Crescent, Salford M.5 4WT
Albert Zumbe
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Salford, Tlie Crescent, Salford M.5 4WT
David Storey
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Salford, Tlie Crescent, Salford M.5 4WT
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The effect of eating chocolate containing sugar alcohols as sweetening agents on colonic fermentation has been investigated by monitoring breath H2 levels. Levels were compared with those occurring after the consumption of normal, sugar-containing chocolate. Ten healthy volunteers aged 19 to 21 years ingested equal amounts of either sorbitol, isomalt or sucrose incorporated into standard chocolate bars. Breath H2 levels after consumption of chocolate containing either sorbitol or isomalt were significantly higher than those after consumption of chocolate containing sucrose (P < 0.001). After consumption of chocolate containing sorbitol, double the mean estimated volume of breath H2 was produced over 6 h compared with that produced after eating chocolate containing isomalt. Taken together with results relating to the incidence of intolerance symptoms, these findings demonstrate that sorbitol is associated with greater colonic fermentation compared with isomalt.

Type
Breath hydrogen responses to bulk sweeteners
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1994

References

Bond, J. H. & Levitt, M. D. (1972). Use of pulmonary hydrogen (H,) measurements to quantitate carbohydrate absorption. Journal of Clinical Investigation 51, 12191225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fritz, M., Siebert, G. & Kaspar, H. (1985). Dose dependence of breath hydrogen and methane in healthy volunteers after ingestion of a commercial disaccharide mixture Palatinit. British Journal of Nutrition 54, 389400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gart, J. J. (1969). An exact test for comparing matched proportions in crossover designs. Biometrika 56, 7580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grenby, T. H. (1983). Nutritive sucrose substitutes and dental health. In: Developments in Sweeteners, pp. 5182 [Grenby, T. H., Parker, K. J. and Lindley, M. G., editors]. Barking, Essex: Applied Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Grenby, T. H., Philips, A. & Mistry, M. (1989). Studies of the dental properties of lactitol compared with five other bulk sweeteners in vitro. Caries Research 23, 315319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grupp, U. & Siebert, G. (1978). Metabolism of hydrogenated palatinose, an equimolar mixture of α-D-glucopyranosido-l-6-sorbitoland α-D-glucopyranosido-l-6-mannitol. Research in Experimental Medicine (Berlin) 173, 261278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyams, S. (1983). Sorbitol intolerance : An unappreciated cause of functional gastrointestinal complaints. Gastroenterology 84, 3033.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kalbermatten, N., Ravussin, E., Maeder, E., Geser, C., Jequier, E. & Felber, J. P. (1980). Comparison of glucose, fructose, sorbitol and xylitol utilisation in humans during insulin suppression. Metabolism 1, 6266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNeil, N. I. (1984). The contribution of the large intestine to energy supplies in man. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 39, 338342.Google ScholarPubMed
Nilsson, U. & Jagerstad, M. (1987). Hydrolysis of lactitol, maltitol and Palatinit by human intestinal biopsies. British Journal of Nutrition 58, 199206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nutrition Council of the Netherlands (1987). The Energy Value of Sugar Alcohols: Recommendation of the Committee on Polyalcohols. The Hague: Department of Health.Google Scholar
Paul, A. A. & Southgate, D. A. T. (1978). McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 4th ed. London: H.M. Stationery Office.Google Scholar
Russell, A. L. (1974). Carbohydrates as a causative factor in dental caries: Epidemiological evidence. In Sugars in Nutrition, pp. 635643 [Sipple, H. L. and McNutt, K. W., editors]. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Saunders, D. R. & Wiggins, H. S. (1981). Conservation of mannitol, lactulose and raffinose by the human colon. American Journal of Physiology 241, G397–G402.Google ScholarPubMed
Spengler, M., Somogyi, J. C., Pletcher, E. & Boehme, K. (1987). Tolerability, acceptance and energetic conversion in isomalt (Palatinit) in comparison with sucrose. Aktuelle Ernahrungsmedizin 6 (12), 210214.Google Scholar
Stephen, A. M., Haddad, A. C. & Philips, S. F. (1983). Passage of carbohydrate into the colon: Direct measurements in humans. Gastroenterology 85, 589595.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone-Dorshaw, T. & Levitt, M. D. (1987). Gaseous response to ingestion of a poorly absorbed fructo- oligosaccharide sweetener. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 46, 6165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swan, D. C., Davidson, P. & Albrink, M. J. (1966). Effect of simple and complex carbohydrate on plasma non-esterified fatty acids, plasma sugar and plasma insulin during oral carbohydrate tolerance tests. Lancet 9, 6063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tadesse, K. & Eastwood, M. A. (1978). Metabolism of dietary fibre components in man assessed by breath hydrogen and methane. British Journal of Nutrition 40, 393395.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thiebaud, D., Jacot, E., Schmitz, H., Spengler, M. & Felber, J. P. (1984). Comparative study of isomalt and sucrose by means of indirect calorimetry. Metabolism 33, 808813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed