Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T13:54:52.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Citations and ‘impact factor’ – the Holy Grail

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Paul Trayhurn
Paul Trayhurn
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3GA, UK, p.trayhurn@liverpool.ac.uk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Editorial
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 88 , Issue 1 , July 2002 , pp. 1 - 2
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 2002

References

Adams, D (2002) The counting house. Nature 415, 726–729.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durnin, JV & Rahaman, MM (1967) The assessment of the amount of fat in the human body from measurements of skinfold thickness. British Journal of Nutrition 21, 681–689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jackson, AS & Pollock, ML (1978) Generalized equations for predicting body density of men. British Journal of Nutrition 40, 497–504.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Seglen, PO (1997) Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal 314, 498–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar