Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T03:31:26.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison and evaluation of mechanistic rumen models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

A. Bannink ,
H. De Visser  and
A. M. Van Vuuren
A. Bannink
Affiliation:
DLO-Institute for Animal Science and Health, Department of Ruminant Nutrition, PO Box 65, NL 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
H. De Visser
Affiliation:
DLO-Institute for Animal Science and Health, Department of Ruminant Nutrition, PO Box 65, NL 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
A. M. Van Vuuren
Affiliation:
DLO-Institute for Animal Science and Health, Department of Ruminant Nutrition, PO Box 65, NL 8200 AB Lelystad, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Mechanistic rumen models of Baldwin (1995), Danfæer (1990) and Dijkstra et al. (1992) were compared on identical inputs that were derived from trials with lactating dairy cows fed on grass herbage. Consistent differences were detected between models and between predicted and observed outputs. None of the models seemed to predict all nutrient flows best. The models particularly differed in the representation of microbial metabolism: degradation of insoluble substrate, fermentation of substrate into volatile fatty acids, and incorporation of substrate into microbial matter. Differences amongst models in the prediction of these processes compensated for each other and consequently all models predicted the duodenal flow of non-NH3 N, microbial N and organic matter reasonably well. Large differences remained in the prediction of individual nutrient flows, however, and it was stressed that in order to enhance prediction of the profile of nutrient flows, the mechanisms of microbial metabolism need to be tested on their ability to describe the intraruminal transactions. However, this requires more-detailed information on individual nutrient flows and on the microbial or non-microbial origin of duodenal contents. Parameter inputs for physical and chemical feed properties were identified that are improperly defined in extant models or susceptible to error. The description of these feed characteristics needs to be developed further and become identifiable for a wide range of dietary conditions.

Keywords

RumenModelsLactation
Type
Animal Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 78 , Issue 4 , October 1997 , pp. 563 - 581
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1997

References

REFERENCES

Argyle, J. L. & Baldwin, R. L. (1988) Modeling of the rumen water kinetics and effects on rumen pH changes. Journal of Dairy Science 71, 1178–1188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baldwin, R. L. (1995) Modelling Ruminant Digestion and Metabolism. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R. L., Lucas, H. L. & Cabrera, R. (1970) Energetic relationships in the formation and utilization of fermentation end-products. In Physiology of Digestion and Metabolism in the Ruminant, pp. 319–334 [Phillipson, A. T., Annison, E. F., Amstrong, D. G., Balch, C. C., Cromline, R. S., Hardy, R. S., Hobson, P. N., Keynes, R. D., editors]. Newcastle upon Tyne: Oriel Press.Google Scholar
Baldwin, R. L., Thornley, J. H. M. & Beever, D. E. (1987) Metabolism of the lactating cow. II. Digestive elements of a mechanistic model. Journal of Dairy Research 54, 107–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bannink, A. & de Visser, H. (1995) Comparison of mechanistic rumen models on microbial metabolism. In Methods in Modelling Herbivore Nutrition. Satellite of IVth International Symposium on the Nutrition of Herbivores [Sauvant, D., editor]. Paris, France: Institut National Agronomique Paris-Grignon and Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique.Google Scholar
Bosch, M. W. (1991) Influence of Stage of Maturity of Grass Silages on Digestion Processes in Dairy Cows. PhD Thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
Broderick, G. A. & Merchen, N. R. (1992) Markers for quantifying microbial protein synthesis in the rumen. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 2618–2632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Czerkawski, J. W. (1986) An Introduction to Rumen Studies. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Danfæer, A. (1990) A Dynamic Model of Nutrient Digestion and Metabolism in Lactating Dairy Cows. PhD Thesis, Report 671, National Institute of Animal Science, Denmark.Google Scholar
De Peters, E. J. & Morris, J. G. (1984) Discussion: rumen digestion and digestion end products. In Modeling Ruminant Digestion and Metabolism. Proceedings of the Second International Workshop, pp. 63–68 [Baldwin, R. L., Bywater, A. C., editors]. Davis, California: University of California.Google Scholar
Dijkstra, J. (1994) Simulation of the dynamics of protozoa in the rumen. British Journal of Nutrition 72, 679–699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dijkstra, J., Neal, H. D., St, C., Beever, D. E. & France, J. (1992) Simulation of nutrient digestion, absorption and outflow in the rumen: model description. Journal of Nutrition 122, 2239–2256.Google Scholar
Goswami, A. K. & Willcox, J. S. (1969) Effect of applying increasing levels of nitrogen to ryegrass. I. Composition of various nitrogenous fractions and free amino acids. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 20, 592–595.Google Scholar
McLeod, M. N. & Minson, D. J. (1988) Large particle breakdown by cattle eating ryegrass and alfalfa. Journal of Animal Science 66, 992–999.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murphy, M. R., Baldwin, R. L. & Koong, L. J. (1982) Estimation of stoichiometric parameters for rumen fermentation of roughage and concentrate diets. Journal of Animal Science 55, 411–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neal, H. D., St, C., Dijkstra, J. & Gill, M. (1992) Simulation of nutrient digestion, absorption and outflow in the rumen: model evaluation. Journal of Nutrition 122, 2257–2272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nocek, J. E. & Tamminga, S. (1991) Site of digestion of starch in the gastrointestinal tract of dairy cows and its effect on milk yield and composition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3598–3629.Google Scholar
Poppi, D. P., Minson, D. J. & Ternouth, J. H. (1981) Studies of cattle and sheep eating leaf and stem fractions of grasses. III. The retention time in the rumen of large feed particles. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 32, 123–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, C. K., Harmon, D. L. & Cecava, M. J. (1994) Absorption and delivery of nutrients for milk protein synthesis by portal-drained viscera. Journal of Dairy Science 77, 2787–2808.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Russell, J. B. (1984) Factors influencing competition and composition of the rumen bacterial flora. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Herbivore Nutrition in the Subtropics and Tropics, pp. 313–345 [Gilchrist, F. C. M., Mackie, R. I., editors]. Craighall: The Science Press.Google Scholar
Sauvant, D. & Ramangasoavina, B. (1991) Rumen modelling. In Rumen Microbial Metabolism and Ruminant Digestion, pp. 283–296 [Jouany, J.-P., editor]. Paris, France: Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique.Google Scholar
Siddons, R. C., Beever, D. E. & Nolan, J. V. (1982) Comparison of methods for the estimation of microbial nitrogen in duodenal digesta of sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 48, 377–389.Google Scholar
Speckhart, F. H. & Green, W. L. (1976) A Guide to Using CSMP– the Continuous System Modeling Program. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Van Gylswyk, N. O. & Schwartz, H. M. (1984) Microbial ecology of the rumen of animals fed high-fibre diets. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Herbivore Nutrition in the Subtropics and Tropics, pp. 359–377 [Gilchrist, F. C. M., Mackie, R. I., editors]. Craighall: The Science Press.Google Scholar
Van Vuuren, A. M., Krol-Kramer, F., van der Lee, R. A. & Corbijn, H. (1992) Protein digestion and intestinal amino acids in dairy cows fed fresh Lolium perenne with different nitrogen contents. Journal of Dairy Science 75, 2215–2225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Vuuren, A. M., van der Koelen, C. J. & Vroons-de Bruin, J. (1993) Effects of partial replacement of ryegrass by concentrates high in starch or fiber on protein digestion and intestinal amino acids in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science 76, 2692–2700.Google Scholar
Voigt, J., Schönhusen, U., Krawielitzki, R. & Piatkowski, B. (1991) Comparison of 15N, amino acid profile, RNA, DAPA and D-alanine as markers for microbial nitrogen flowing to the duodenum of dairy cows. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Protein Metabolism and Nutrition. European Association of Animal Production Publication no. 59, pp. 71–73. Herning, Denmark: EAAP.Google Scholar
Woodford, S. T. & Murphy, M. R. (1988) Dietary alteration of particle breakdown and passage from the rumen in lactating dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 71, 687–696.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed