Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:31:41.482Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Composition of the human foetus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2010

Sharad V. Apte  and
Leela Iyengar
Sharad V. Apte
Affiliation:
National Institute of Nutrition, Indian Council of Medical Research, Jamai-Osmania, Hyderabad-7 (A.P.), India
Leela Iyengar
Affiliation:
National Institute of Nutrition, Indian Council of Medical Research, Jamai-Osmania, Hyderabad-7 (A.P.), India
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. The body composition was determined of forty-one fetuses of different gestational ages born to mothers belonging to a low socio-economic group of the population.

2. With increasing gestational age the water content fell from 88% at 28 weeks to 76% at term; the fat content increased from 2.1% to 11.2% and the protein content increased from 6.9 to 9.3%.

3. The changes in body composition were more closely related to body-weight than to gestational age.

4. The calcium, Phosphorus and magnesium contents of the body per unit fat-free weight progressively increased with gestational age, and at term the values appeared to be considerably lower than those reported in the literature. The Ca:P ratio was constant at different body-weights.

5. The body iron content per unit of fat-free weight increased marginally with increasing gestational age. The value was almost 30% lower than the values reported from elsewhere.

6. It is suggested that chemical composition and nutrient stores of the developing foetus can be considerably influenced by the state of maternal nutrition.

Type
Clinical and Human Nutrition
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 27 , Issue 2 , March 1972 , pp. 305 - 312
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1972

References

Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (1960). Oficial Methods of Analysis 9th ed., p.84. Washington, DC: Association of Official Agricultural ChemistsGoogle Scholar
Clark, E. P. & Collip, J. B. (1925). J. biol. Chem. 63, 461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Givens, M. H. & Macy, I. G. (1933). J. biol. Chem. 102, 7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iob, V. & Swanson, W. W. (1934). Am. J. Dis. Child. 47, 302.Google Scholar
Iyengar, J. & Apte, S. V. (1972). Br. J. Nutr. 27, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, H. J., Sloan, R. E., Hoffman, W. & Saunders, C. (1951). Hum. Biol. 23, 61.Google Scholar
Orange, M. & Rhein, H. C. (1951). J. biol. Chem. 189, 379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oser, B. L. (1965). Hawk's Physiological Chemistry 14th ed., p.1219. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Venkatachalam, P. S. (1962). Bull. Wld Hlth Org. 26, 193.Google Scholar
Widdowson, E. M. (1968). In Biology of Gestation Vol. 2, p. 23 [Asah, N. S., editor]. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Widdowson, E. M. & Dickerson, J. W. T. (1964). In Mineral Metabolism Vol. 2, Part A The Elements, Processes and Systems p.26 [Comer, C. L. and F., Bronner, editors]. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Widdowson, E. M. & Spray, C. M. (1951). Arch Dis. Childh. 26, 205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, S. Y. (1928). J. biol. Chem. 77, 409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar