Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-11T15:21:56.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determination of fluoride concentration in powdered milk in Iran 2010

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2011

Amir Hossein Mahvi
Affiliation:
School of Public Health and Center for Environmental Research, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Maryam Ghanbarian
Affiliation:
Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran
Marjan Ghanbarian*
Affiliation:
Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran
Ahmad Khosravi
Affiliation:
Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran
Masoud Ghanbarian
Affiliation:
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
*
*Corresponding author: M. Ghanbarian, email ghanbarian1981@yahoo.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

High concentrations of fluoride (F) in powdered milk (formula milk) can have adverse health effects on the body. The F concentration in powdered milk was analysed in Iran in 2010. A total of twelve commercial brands of highly consumed powdered milk were selected to analyse the F content through the standard F ion-selective electrode method. From each brand, three samples with different production dates were selected. The means and standard deviation for F concentration in all the samples was 1·73 (sd 0·3) μg F/g. The minimum and maximum F content in powdered milk brands Humana2 and Humana3 was 1·32 (sd 0·1) and 2·36 (sd 0·3) μg F/g, respectively. The study revealed that there was no significant difference in F concentration in the samples that belonged to various dates. Humana3 had a high F concentration (with an average of 2·36 (sd 0·3) μg F/g), which can be a risk factor for increased dental fluorosis, especially when being prepared using water with a high content of F.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2011

During the production procedure, baby powdered milk is processed as slurry in a rotating cylinder before being dehydrated. The existing water in the slurry vapourises and fluoride (F) remains in the milk. Therefore, the F concentration in the water used during the processing can have an effect on the total F concentration in baby powdered milk. F is an element that can be supplied from foods and drinks. Excessive intake of F is known to cause a wide range of adverse health effects such as damaging the bones and teeth(Reference Dobaradaran, Mahvi and Dehdashti1Reference Fomon, Ekstrand and Ziegler4).

Several previous studies(Reference Dobaradaran, Mahvi and Dehdashti1Reference Mahvi, Zazoli and Younecian3, Reference Burgstahler5Reference Ericsson9) have determined the F content of water, tea, baby foods and milk. Since milk F is absorbable(Reference Ericsson9), measuring F concentration in children's nutrition and milk is essential during the years in which children are at risk for fluorosis. It has been found that to be on the safe side for the risk of fluorosis or dental caries in future, the estimated mean daily F intake should be at or below 0·05 mg F/kg of body weight for nearly all time points through the first 48 months of life(Reference Warren, Levy and Broffitt10). In another survey, it was found that the study group for fluorosis (97 % of which was mild) had significantly greater cumulative F intake from powdered infant formulas and other beverages with added water than did those without fluorosis(Reference Levy, Broffitt and Marshall11).

The purpose of the present study was to quantify the amount of F in the highly consumed baby powdered milk in Iran in 2010.

Subjects and methods

A total of twelve commercial brands of highly consumed powdered milk that included Humana1, Humana2, Humana3, Multi1, Multi2, Bebelac1, Bebelac2, Nan1, Nan2, Sama gold, Sama progres and Biomil were randomly collected from drugstores that were selling the highly consumed baby powdered milk on three different dates. First, the number and types of existing, permitted baby powdered milk available in drugstores were identified.

Samples were analysed in the Central Nutrition Laboratory of Tehran. F content was determined using the standard F ion-selective electrode method. The precision of this method is in the range of 0·02–1900 parts per million with 95 % CI. This type of electrode incorporates a special ion-sensitive membrane, which may be a glass, a crystalline inorganic material or an organic ion exchanger. The membrane interacts specifically with the ion of choice, in our case F, allowing the electrical potential of the half cell to be controlled predominantly by the F concentration. All statistical analyses were performed using the software SPSS (version 16; Chicago, IL, USA).

Results

The result of the analysis of the highly consumed formula milk is demonstrated in Table 1. The mean for F concentration in all the samples was 1·73 (sd 0·3) μg F/g. The highest mean concentration was found in Humana3, with a mean F concentration of 2·36 (sd 0·3) μg F/g. In other brands of formula milk, there was no significant difference in the F content. Humana2 with 1·32 (sd 0·1) μg F/g had the least concentration of F content among all the samples.

Table 1 Total fluoride (F) content of twelve brands of Iranian baby powder milk

(Ranges, mean values and standard deviations)

Discussion

Several studies(Reference Fomon, Ekstrand and Ziegler4, Reference Fomon and Ekstrand12Reference Evans and Darvell14) have revealed that the amount of F received by the children cannot be measured only by examining F-added water, but should also be measured by examining other drinks and foods. Although quantification of the amount of F received by children is very demanding, it is obvious that there is a significant difference in the amount of F from different foods and drinks.

The minimum and maximum F content was 1·32 (sd 0·1) and 2·36 (sd 0·3) μg F/g in Humana2 and Humana3, respectively. Humana3 had considerable amounts of F in comparison with other analysed powdered milk (2·36 (sd 0·3) μg F/g), which can be a risk factor for developing fluorosis, especially when it is prepared with other sources of F such as water.

Therefore, the amount of F should be mentioned on the tin label of the baby powdered milk. Moreover, it may be essential to increase the Ca concentration of these products to reduce F absorption in the stomach and the intestine(Reference Silva Cardoso, Olympio and Granjeiro13).

Another effect of the products with a higher content of Ca is the reduction of the body's capability to absorb F. It should be considered that powdered milk has to be mixed with water for consumption. When the powdered milk is prepared with water containing F, the existing F in the water would be added to the F absorption rate analysis. Thus, F in the water should be considered during the analysis(Reference Silva Cardoso, Olympio and Granjeiro13).

The high levels of F in Humana3 may be the consequence of water consumed in the factory during the production procedure.

During the production procedure, baby powdered milk is processed as a slurry in a rotating cylinder before being dehydrated. The existing water of the slurry vapourises and F remains in the milk(Reference Silva Cardoso, Olympio and Granjeiro13). Therefore, the F concentration in the water used during processing can have an effect on the total F concentration in the baby powdered milk.

Fomon & Ekstrand(Reference Fomon and Ekstrand12) reported that F concentration in infant food that was produced with non-fluoridated water and F-added water was in the range of 0·09–0·2 and 4–6 parts per million, respectively. The present study revealed that F concentration in the analysed products belonging to three different production dates was not significantly different. Measurement of F concentration on various production dates was to prevent any inconsistency that usually occurs during the production process because of unwanted changes in water content. Silva Cardoso et al. (Reference Silva Cardoso, Olympio and Granjeiro13) reported that in the same region F concentration on various production dates was similar.

Another important factor for the development of fluorosis in children is the critical years during which they receive nutrition with F content. Evans & Darvell(Reference Evans and Darvell14) proposed that the central incisor is exposed to a high risk of fluorosis development resulting from consuming nutrition with F content. This risk should be taken into consideration for male infants from 5 to 24 months old and for female infants from 21 to 35 months old. The critical period for incisors is after 12 months in which F absorption from nutrition produced by factories increases(Reference Fomon, Ekstrand and Ziegler4, Reference Evans and Darvell14). The labels on the baby powdered milk and the products of factories catering to children's nutrition should contain information on F concentration in addition to other nutritional facts.

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Iranian government, which made the study possible. There are no conflicts of interest for any of the authors of the present study. M. G. collected the data and wrote the manuscript; A. H. M. designed the study; A. K. analysed the data; Maryam Ghanbarian and Masoud Ghanbarian collected the data and contributed to the manuscript.

References

1 Dobaradaran, S, Mahvi, AH & Dehdashti, S (2008) Fluoride content of bottled drinking water available in Iran. Fluoride 41, 9394.Google Scholar
2 Dobaradaran, S, Mahvi, AH, Dehdashti, S, et al. (2008) Drinking water fluoride and child dental caries in Dashtestan, Iran. Fluoride 41, 220226.Google Scholar
3 Mahvi, AH, Zazoli, MA, Younecian, M, et al. (2006) Fluoride content of Iranian black tea and tea liquor. Fluoride 39, 266268.Google Scholar
4 Fomon, SJ, Ekstrand, J & Ziegler, EE (2000) Fluoride intake and prevalence of dental fluorsis: trend in fluoride intake with special attention to infants. J Public Health Dent 60, 131139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5 Burgstahler, AW (2006) Fluoridated bottled water (editorial). Fluoride 39, 252254.Google Scholar
6 Adair, SM & Wei, HY (1978) Supplemental fluoride recommendations for infants based on dietary fluoride intake. Caries Res 12, 7682.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Buzalaf, MAR, Granjeiro, JM, Damante, CA, et al. (2001) Fluoride content of infant baby powders prepared with deionized, bottled mineral and fluoridated drink water. J Dent Child 68, 3741.Google Scholar
8 Van Winkle, S, Levy, SM & Kiritsy, MC (1995) Water and baby powder fluoride concentrations: significance for infants fed baby powder. Pediatr Dent 17, 305310.Google Scholar
9 Ericsson, Y (1958) State of fluoride in milk and its absorption and retention when administration in milk. Investigations with radio-active fluorine. Acta Odont Scand 16, 5172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10 Warren, JJ, Levy, SM, Broffitt, B, et al. (2010) Consideration on optimal fluoride intake using dental fluorosis and dental caries outcomes – a longitudinal study. Fluoride 43, 253254.Google Scholar
11 Levy, SM, Broffitt, B, Marshall, TA, et al. (2010) Associations between fluorosis of permanent incisors and fluoride intake from infant formula, other dietary sources and dentifrice during early childhood. Fluoride 43, 254255.Google Scholar
12 Fomon, SJ & Ekstrand, J (1999) Fluoride intake by infants. J Public Health Dent 59, 229234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13 Silva Cardoso, VE, Olympio, KPK & Granjeiro, JM (2003) Fluoride content of several breakfast cereals and snacks found in Brazil. J Appl Oral Sci 11, 306310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Evans, WR & Darvell, BW (1995) Refining the estimate of the critical period for susceptibility to enamel fluorosis in human maxillary central incisors. J Publ Health Dent 55, 238249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Table 1 Total fluoride (F) content of twelve brands of Iranian baby powder milk(Ranges, mean values and standard deviations)