Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T16:29:39.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Diets high in resistant starch and arabinoxylan modulate digestion processes and SCFA pool size in the large intestine and faecal microbial composition in pigs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 October 2014

Tina S. Nielsen*
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, PO Box 50, DK-8830Tjele, Denmark
Helle N. Lærke
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, PO Box 50, DK-8830Tjele, Denmark
Peter K. Theil
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, PO Box 50, DK-8830Tjele, Denmark
Jens F. Sørensen
Affiliation:
DuPont Industrial Biosciences, Edwin Rahrs Vej 38, DK-8220Brabrand, Denmark
Markku Saarinen
Affiliation:
DuPont Nutrition and Health, Sokeritehtaantie 20, 02460Kantvik, Finland
Sofia Forssten
Affiliation:
DuPont Nutrition and Health, Sokeritehtaantie 20, 02460Kantvik, Finland
Knud E. Bach Knudsen
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Science and Technology, Aarhus University, Blichers Allé 20, PO Box 50, DK-8830Tjele, Denmark
*
*Corresponding author: T. S. Nielsen, email tinas.nielsen@agrsci.dk
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The effects of a high level of dietary fibre (DF) either as arabinoxylan (AX) or resistant starch (RS) on digestion processes, SCFA concentration and pool size in various intestinal segments and on the microbial composition in the faeces were studied in a model experiment with pigs. A total of thirty female pigs (body weight 63·1 (sem 4·4) kg) were fed a low-DF, high-fat Western-style control diet (WSD), an AX-rich diet (AXD) or a RS-rich diet (RSD) for 3 weeks. Diet significantly affected the digestibility of DM, protein, fat, NSP and NSP components, and the arabinose:xylose ratio, as well as the disappearance of NSP and AX in the large intestine. RS was mainly digested in the caecum. AX was digested at a slower rate than RS. The digesta from AXD-fed pigs passed from the ileum to the distal colon more than twice as fast as those from WSD-fed pigs, with those from RSD-fed pigs being intermediate (P< 0·001). AXD feeding resulted in a higher number of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Roseburia intestinalis, Blautia coccoides–Eubacterium rectale, Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus spp. in the faeces sampled at week 3 of the experimental period (P< 0·05). In the caecum, proximal and mid colon, AXD feeding resulted in a 3- to 5-fold higher pool size of butyrate compared with WSD feeding, with the RSD being intermediate (P <0·001). In conclusion, the RSD and AXD differently affected digestion processes compared with the WSD, and the AXD most efficiently shifted the microbial composition towards butyrogenic species in the faeces and increased the large-intestinal butyrate pool size.

Type
Full Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2014 

A dietary pattern characterised by a high intake of fat, proteins from meat, refined carbohydrates and a low intake of non-digestible carbohydrates (dietary fibre, DF), as is typical for many people in affluent societies, is regarded as a significant risk factor for the development of colorectal cancers( Reference Lipkin, Reddy and Newmark 1 ) and for the onset and relapse of inflammatory bowel disease( Reference Spooren, Pierik and Zeegers 2 ). The low content of DF in a Western-style diet (WSD) is a limiting factor for maintaining a viable and diverse microbial community and for the production of small organic molecules such as SCFA, primarily acetate, propionate and butyrate( Reference Wong, de Souza and Kendall 3 ). Especially, butyrate has been suggested to be a main modulator of colonic health and function( Reference Leonel and Alvarez-Leite 4 ), and SCFA has been mostly associated with protection against chemically and dietary-induced colorectal carcinogenic pre-stages in rats( Reference Perrin, Pierre and Patry 5 , Reference Toden, Bird and Topping 6 ). Apart from being the preferred energy source for colonic epithelial cells and the major regulator of cell proliferation and differentiation( Reference Wong, de Souza and Kendall 3 ), butyrate has been shown to exert important actions related to cellular homeostasis, such as anti-inflammatory( Reference Kovarik, Tillinger and Hofer 7 ), antioxidant( Reference Hamer, Jonkers and Bast 8 ) and anti-carcinogenic( Reference Clarke, Young and Topping 9 ) functions. Many of these effects have been related to its action as a histone deacetylase inhibitor( Reference Canani, Di Costanzo and Leone 10 , Reference Fung, Cosgrove and Lockett 11 ).

Identification of DF types that can increase the production of colonic butyrate is therefore of great interest. Resistant starch (RS), which is included in the definition of DF( 12 ), covers a diverse range of starches that are not enzymatically degraded in the small intestine of human subjects, but, instead, fermented in the large intestine, favouring butyrate production( Reference Bird, Conlon and Christophersen 13 ). Recently, a diet high in RS has been shown to modulate microbial composition and increase colonic butyrate concentration in the proximal part of the colon in pigs( Reference Haenen, Zhang and Souza da Silva 14 ). As most micro-organisms prefer to ferment carbohydrate over protein, saccharolytic fermentation occurs predominantly in the proximal colon. Proteolytic fermentation, resulting in the production of potentially harmful metabolites such as NH3, S-containing compounds, indoles and phenols, takes place in the more distal colon where the amount of fermentable carbohydrates is diminished( Reference Hamer, Jonkers and Venema 15 ), and this coincides with the fact that many colonic diseases appear in the distal colon( Reference Jackson-Thompson, Ahmed and German 16 ). A more distal fermentation of dietary carbohydrates is therefore desirable( Reference Kolida, Tuohy and Gibson 17 ), and the challenge is to have a non-digestible carbohydrate substrate delivered to the distal colon for increased microbial fermentation and butyrate production. Arabinoxylans (AX) are another interesting type of DF in this respect. Their structure consists of a backbone of xylose units substituted with arabinose monomers( Reference Izydorczyk and Biliaderis 18 ). These may further be linked to other compounds such as glucuronic acid and ferulic acid, leading to covalent ester bonding between the carboxyl groups of uronic acids and the hydroxyl groups of AX, as well as the formation of diferulic acid bridges between the adjacent AX chains( Reference Izydorczyk and Biliaderis 18 ); altogether, fermentation requires a broad spectrum of enzymes and thereby AX are potential candidates to be a slowly fermentable fibre source( Reference Glitso, Gruppen and Schols 19 ) and a substrate for butyrate production in the distal colon.

It is hypothesised that both RS and AX stimulate butyrate production in the large intestine. In the present study, we investigated the effects of diets enriched in DF as mainly RS or AX compared with a Western-style type of diet high in fat, refined carbohydrates and low in DF on nutrient digestibility, concentration and pool size of fermentation products in various segments of the intestinal tract and faecal microbial composition in pigs as a model for humans. Pigs are shown to be a suitable model for human metabolism in food research( Reference Nielsen, Hartvigsen and Hedemann 20 ), and the anatomy and physiology of the gastrointestinal tract in pigs are regarded as comparable to humans( Reference Miller and Ullrey 21 ).

Materials and methods

Experimental diets

The three dietary treatments were a WSD, an AX diet (AXD) or a RS diet (RSD). The WSD was designed to mimic the diet of many people in affluent societies characterised by being high in sugar, refined grains and saturated fat and low in DF (6 %). The AXD and RSD were formulated to contain high DF (17 %) mainly in the form of AX derived from enzyme-treated wheat bran and rye flakes or type 2 RS from high-amylose maize (HAM-RS2; HI-MAIZE260®, Ingredion Incorporated) and raw potato starch. Before its incorporation into the AXD, wheat bran was treated with xylanases and cellulases to increase the content of AX oligosaccharides (AXOS). AXOS have been shown to have a stimulating effect on intestinal butyrate production in human subjects compared with wheat bran without in situ-produced AXOS( Reference Damen, Cloetens and Broekaert 22 ). Rye flakes were chosen as the main AX supplier because rye is an important cereal in a typical Danish diet, and earlier studies with rye-based diets (whole-grain rye plus rye bran) have shown high butyrate production( Reference Bach Knudsen, Serena and Kjaer 23 ). The sources of RS were chosen to ensure comparability to RS ingredients applied in a human dietary intervention study within this project frame. HAM-RS2 was the main RS source in human diets since it is resistant to cooking and can be incorporated into many foods. RS from raw potato starch is not resistant to cooking and was therefore included in a minor proportion. Overall, the AX and RS ingredients were chosen to simulate the complexity of human diets. The three diets were designed to provide the same amount of energy from fat (30 %) and protein (17 %), while the proportion of energy originating from DF was 3·5 % in the WSD and 9 % in the RSD and AXD (see Tables 1 and 2 for dietary ingredients and chemical composition, respectively).

Table 1 Ingredients of the Western-style diet (WSD), the resistant starch diet (RSD) and the arabinoxylan diet (AXD)

* Ingredion Incorporated.

Arla Foods Ingredients Amba, Viby J.

J. Rettenmaier and Söhne GmbH.

§ Supplied per kg diet: 18·9 mg retinol (vitamin A); 0·15 mg cholecalciferol (vitamin D3); 1038 mg α-tocopherol (vitamin E); 31·5 mg vitamin K; 31·5 mg vitamin B1; 31·5 mg vitamin B2; 157·5 mg d-pantothenic acid (vitamin B5); 315 mg niacin (vitamin B3); 0·79 mg biotin (vitamin B7); 0·315 mg vitamin B12; 47·3 mg vitamin B6; 1260 mg Fe; 225 mg copper sulphate; 630 mg Mn (VA Vit SL/US Anti; Vilomix).

Table 2 Chemical composition and particle size distribution of the Western-style diet (WSD), the resistant starch diet (RSD) and the arabinoxylan diet (AXD)

AX, arabinoxylan; RS, resistant starch; DMSO, dimethyl sulphoxide; AXOS, arabinoxylan oligosaccharides; CHO, carbohydrate.

* RS was determined by the Megazyme assay (Megazyme International).

76 % of the total RS originated from type 2 resistant starch from high-amylose maize and 24 % from raw potato starch calculated using data on RS content from the suppliers of the ingredients.

Determined using the NSP procedure with the addition of DMSO to disperse RS.

§ Calculated as: total NSP+fructans+RS.

Calculated as: total NSP+fructans+RS+lignin+AXOS.

50 g of sample size for each diet.

The enzyme-treated wheat bran was produced by DuPont Industrial Biosciences, Danisco A/S as follows: commercial wheat bran obtained from Lantmännen Cerealia was suspended in water (bran:water ratio 20:80, w/w) in a closed container with a stirring device. DuPont Grindamyl PowerBake 950 (500 parts per million) and DuPont GC220 (5000 parts per million) were added to the suspension, and the temperature was increased to 50°C and stirring was applied. When the temperature reached 50°C, incubation was continued for 3 h. After 3 h, the temperature was increased to 95°C and maintained at 95°C for 10 min to inactivate enzyme activity. Wheat bran was cooled to ambient temperature and dried using a pilot spray dryer and packed in paper bags. The concentration of oligosaccharides in the enzyme-treated wheat bran was 54 g/kg DM. Commercially available rye flakes was purchased from Lantmännen Cerealia and potato starch from KMC and HAM-RS2 from Ingredion Incorporated. Cr2O3 (0·3 %) was included in all diets to calculate the apparent digestibility of DM, nutrients and NSP components. The AXD containing whole-rye flakes was ground through a hammer mill fitted with a 3·5 mm screen. The analysis of the particle size (Retsch AS 200 Control; Retsch GmbH) for each diet is shown in Table 2. All the three diets qualified as finely ground( Reference Choct, Selby and Cadogan 24 ), and small differences in particle size distribution were not considered as a factor that affected the apparent digestibility of nutrients and NSP components and the mean transit time (MTT) of the digesta. Samples of the experimental diets were collected after production at Aarhus University's own feed production unit and stored at − 20°C until analysis.

Animals and feeding

The care and housing of animals used in the present study were in compliance with Danish laws and regulations for the humane care and use of animals in research (The Danish Ministry of Justice, Animal Testing Act, Consolidation Act no. 1306 of 23 November 2007), and performed under the licence obtained from the Danish Animal Experimentation Inspectorate, Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Fisheries. The health of the animals was monitored, and no serious illness was observed.

A total of thirty female pigs (body weight 63·1 (sem 4·4) kg) recruited from the swine herd at the Department of Animal Science, Aarhus University, Foulum, were fed one of three diets (WSD, AXD or RSD) for an experimental period of 3 weeks. The experiment was conducted in two blocks with five animals per treatment in each block. Pigs were housed individually in pens (1·5 × 2·4 m) without manipulative material (straw), with access to water ad libitum and allowed to adapt to the pen for 5 d before the experimental period.

Daily feed allowance for the pigs treated with the RSD and AXD was 2·7 % of average body weight (75 kg), whereas those treated with the WSD were fed 2·44 % of body weight to ensure similar daily amounts of net energy among the three dietary treatments. Pigs were fed manually three times daily at 10.00, 15.00 and 20.00 hours (33·3 % of total ration at each meal) to mimic the human meal pattern. Very few feed leftovers were observed; however, any feed leftovers were registered before the morning feeding and weighed to calculate feed intake. The amount of feed supplied to pigs 1·5 h before slaughter was adjusted slightly to provide equal amounts (300 g) of digestible carbohydrates regardless of diet, in order to obtain as much consistency as possible with the study design developed by Ingerslev et al. ( Reference Ingerslev, Theil and Hedemann 25 ) using the same diets as described here, in a catheterised pig model. A fresh faecal sample was obtained 3 d before slaughter and stored at − 20°C until analysis. Body weight was recorded weekly.

Slaughter and sample collection

Pigs were stunned using a captive bolt pistol and subsequently bled from the jugular vein. The abdominal cavity was opened and the gastrointestinal tract was ligated at the oesophagus and rectum and removed from the carcass. The length of the small intestine was measured and divided into three parts of equal lengths. The content of the distal third (Si3) was collected for analysis, and the entire empty small intestine was weighed. Caecal (Cae) digesta was weighed, and the large intestine (colon) was isolated and the length determined. The positions at 25, 50 and 75 % of the length of the colon (descending) were termed Co1, Co2 and Co3, respectively. Digesta from the colon segments were weighed and the entire empty colon was weighed. pH was measured in the Si3, Cae, Co1, Co2 and Co3 digesta, and samples of the digesta from these intestinal segments were stored at − 20°C until further analysis.

Analytical methods

All chemical analyses on diets were performed in duplicate on freeze-dried material. DM content was determined by drying the samples at 103°C to constant weight, and ash was analysed according to the AOAC method (923.03; AOAC)( 26 ). N was measured by Dumas( Reference Hansen 27 ) and protein calculated as N × 6·25. Gross energy was analysed on a 6300 Automatic Isoperibol Calorimeter System (Parr Instruments). Fat was determined using the Stoldt procedure( Reference Stoldt 28 ). Dietary contents of sugars (glucose, fructose and sucrose) and fructans were analysed as described by Larsson & Bengtsson( Reference Larsson and Bengtsson 29 ). Starch and NSP were analysed essentially as described by Bach Knudsen( Reference Bach Knudsen 30 ) except that acid hydrolysis was performed in 2 m-H2SO4 for 1 h instead of 1 m-H2SO4 for 2 h. AX was calculated as the sum of the arabinose and xylose residues of the NSP procedure mentioned above. AXOS were calculated from arabinose and xylose residues not precipitating in 80 % ethanol when analysing the samples by direct acid hydrolysis of the NSP fraction without prior starch removal and alcohol precipitation and subtracting the values for AX after starch removal and alcohol precipitation( Reference Kasprzak, Lærke and Bach Knudsen 31 ). When the RSD and the individual RSD ingredients were analysed for NSP by the enzymatic–chemical method( Reference Bach Knudsen 30 ), it was found that part of the RS in the RSD and in the HAM-RS2 ingredient was not degraded. Therefore, NSP in the RSD and in the digesta of pigs fed the RSD was subsequently analysed with the addition of dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) to disperse RS( Reference Englyst and Cummings 32 ). The RS estimated with this method is designated as RSDMSO. All the three diets and digesta from RSD-fed pigs were analysed for total RS content with a commercially available kit (Megazyme International Ireland), designated as RSenz. Klason lignin was measured as the sulphuric acid-insoluble residue as described by Theander & Åman( Reference Theander and Åman 33 ). β-Glucan was analysed by the enzymatic–colorimetric method of McCleary & Glennie-Holmes( Reference McCleary and Glennie-Holmes 34 ). Chromic oxide was determined colorimetrically using a Lambda 900 spectrophotometer (Perkin-Elmer GmbH), after oxidation to chromate with sodium peroxide following the procedure of Schürch et al. ( Reference Schürch, Lloyd and Crampton 35 ).

Digesta and faecal samples were analysed for the content of SCFA by GC (HP-6890 Series Gas Chromatograph; Hewlett Packard) using an HP-5 column (30 m × 0·32 mm × 0·25 μm) with 5 % phenylpolysiloxane and 95 % demethylpolysiloxane and a flame ionisation detector, after subjecting the samples to an acid–base treatment followed by diethyl ether extraction and derivatisation, as described by Jensen et al. ( Reference Jensen, Cox and Jensen 36 ).

Faecal microbial composition

DNA from each sample was extracted and purified with a commercial kit (MagMAX™ Total Nucleic Acid Isolation Kit; Applied Biosystems), and DNA concentration was determined by a Nanodrop ND-1000 Full-Spectrum UV/Vis Spectrophotometer (NanoDrop Technologies). Quantitative PCR assays were performed in a total volume of 25 μl containing 1 ×  Power SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), 200 nm of each primer for Lactobacillus spp.( Reference Lahtinen, Forssten and Aakko 37 ), 250 nm of each primer for Faecalibacterium prausnitzii ( Reference Rinttila, Kassinen and Malinen 38 ), and 300 nm of each primer for Roseburia spp.( Reference Makivuokko, Nurmi and Nurminen 39 ) and the Blautia coccoides–Eubacterium rectale group( Reference Rinttila, Kassinen and Malinen 38 ). The 25 μl PCR mix for the Bifidobacterium spp.( Reference Makivuokko, Nurmi and Nurminen 39 ) assay contained 1 ×  TaqMan Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), 300 nm of forward and reverse primers and 200 nm of the minor groove binding probe (with a non-fluorescent black hole quencher). All quantitative PCR contained 1 ng of template DNA. The amplification and detection of DNA were performed with the ABI-PRISM 7500 sequencing detection system (Applied Biosystems). For standard curves, 10-fold dilution series ranging between 10 pg and 1 ng were included in the quantitative PCR assays from the following target species: Bifidobacterium adolescentis DSM 20083; Ruminococcus productus DSM 2950; F. prausnitzii ATCC 27768; Lactobacillus acidophilus ATCC 700396; Roseburia intestinalis DSM 14610. For the determination of DNA, triplicate samples were used and the mean quantity was expressed as log10 genomes per g of sample (wet weight), taking into account the size and the 16S ribosomal DNA copy number of the standard species genome.

Calculations

The apparent digestibility coefficients of nutrients and NSP sugars in the digesta from intestinal segments were calculated relative to Cr2O3 concentration, according to the following equation:

$$\begin{eqnarray} Digestibility\,of\, X = 1 - \frac {Cr_{2}O_{3(Diet)}\times X _{(Dig)}}{Cr_{2}O_{3(Dig)}\times X _{(Diet)}}, \end{eqnarray}$$

where X (Diet) and X (Dig) are the concentrations of the component determined in the diet and digesta, respectively, and Cr2O3(Diet) and Cr2O3(Dig) are the concentrations of chromic oxide in the diet and digesta, respectively.

MTT in the large-intestinal segments was calculated as follows:

$$\begin{eqnarray} MTT = \frac {Cr_{2}O_{3(GI)}\times 24}{Cr_{2}O_{3(day)}}, \end{eqnarray}$$

where Cr2O3(GI) is the concentration of Cr2O3 in the digesta and Cr2O3(day) is the daily intake of Cr2O3.

The pool size of SCFA in the digesta was determined by calculating the daily amount of wet undigested DM passing through the intestinal segment multiplied by the concentration of SCFA in the wet luminal content of the segment. The large-intestinal N pool size was determined by calculating the daily amount of undigested DM passing through the intestinal segment multiplied by the N content of DM in the segment.

Statistical analysis

In the present study, two types of analysis on data were carried out. The first type of analysis was accomplished using the MIXED procedure of SAS (SAS Institute, Inc.) followed by adjustment for multiple comparisons by the Tukey–Kramer post hoc test. The effects of diet on the intestinal segment apparent digestibility of DM, macronutrients, NSP components and on the pool of fermentation metabolites in the digesta were analysed using the following normal mixed model:

$$\begin{eqnarray} X _{( ijkl )} = \mu + \alpha _{( i )} + \beta _{(\, j )} + \gamma _{( k )} + \alpha \gamma _{( ik )} + \nu _{( l )} + \varepsilon _{( ijkl )}, \end{eqnarray}$$

were α(i) is the diet (i= WSD, RSD or AXD); β(j) is the random effect of block (j= 1 or 2); γ(k) is the intestinal segment (k= Si3, Cae, Co1, Co2 or Co3); αγ (ik) is the interaction between diet and intestinal segment; ν(l) is the random component related to the pig (l= 1, 2,…, 30). Pig was included as a random component to account for repeated measurements within pigs. The covariance structure for repeated measures across the gut segments was modelled using variance components and the residual error component is defined as ɛ(ijkl). Levels of significance was reported as being significant when P <0·05. The random effects and residuals were assumed to be normally distributed and independent, and their expectations were assumed to be zero.

The second type of analysis compared the effects of dietary treatments on pig weight gain, intake of nutrients, intestinal tract characteristics at slaughter (length and weight of intestinal segments, digesta pH) and microbial composition in the faeces. This model was accomplished by a simple ANOVA-based on the model:

$$\begin{eqnarray} X _{( ij )} = \mu + \alpha _{( i )} + \beta _{( j )} + \alpha \beta _{( ij )} + \varepsilon _{( ij )}, \end{eqnarray}$$

where α(i) is the diet (i= WSD, RSD or AXD); β(j) is the random effect of the block (j= 1 or 2); αβ (ij) is the interaction between diet and block, and ɛ(ij) denotes the residual error under the same assumptions as in the first statistical model.

Principal component analysis (PCA) with evenly spread 7-fold partial cross-validation after mean centring and unit variance scaling was performed using Evince 2.5.5 software (UmBio AB) to detect distributions and separations among the dietary treatments.

Results

Diets, intake of nutrients and intestinal segments at slaughter

The three diets were formulated to provide equal amounts of fat, protein and energy, of which the RSD and AXD provided equal amounts but different types of DF. This was successfully accomplished except for protein (Table 2). The protein content of the AXD was 40–50 g/kg DM lower than the RSD and WSD, which was due to a higher than expected protein content of wheat flour incorporated into the RSD and WSD compared with our database value. The content of total DF was increased 2·7-fold from the WSD to the RSD and AXD. The RSD had a higher RS content >100 g/kg DM compared with the WSD and AXD. The AXD had a higher AX content >50 g/kg DM compared with the WSD and RSD. The RSenz content in the WSD and AXD was negligible; however, it amounted to 113 g/kg DM in the RSD. The RSDMSO content in the RSD was 64 g/kg DM, thereby constituting 56 % of the RSenz. The arabinose:xylose ratio, which is a simple indicator of AX structure, was similar in both the WSD (0·36) and RSD (0·33), but approximately 67 % higher in the AXD. AXOS constituted 2 g/kg DM in the WSD and RSD and 7 g/kg DM in the AXD.

Due to a slightly higher daily feed allowance, the RSD- and AXD-fed pigs consumed approximately 100 g/d more DM than the WSD-fed pigs (Table 3), whereas the WSD- and RSD-fed pigs consumed 69–75 g/d more (P< 0·001) protein than AXD-fed pigs due to the higher content of protein in their diets. The RSD- and AXD-fed pigs consumed 2·8-fold more (P< 0·001) DF compared with the WSD-fed pigs. The average daily gain was approximately 100 g higher (P< 0·05) for the AXD-fed pigs than for the WSD- and RSD-fed pigs. The high fibre level in the RSD and AXD increased the weight of the entire colon by 18–26 % (P< 0·001) and the weight of the colonic digesta by 54–64 % (P< 0·01) compared with the WSD (Table 3). The weight of the caecum was unaffected by the diet, but the weight of the caecal digesta was significantly increased by the AXD compared with the WSD. RSD feeding resulted in a lower (P= 0·02) luminal pH than the WSD in the caecum; however, in the Co1, feeding of both the fibre diets resulted in a significantly lower luminal pH than the WSD. In the Co2, this pH-lowering effect was only significant for the AXD. No effect of diet on luminal pH was observed in the distal colon.

Table 3 Intake of nutrients and energy, weight gain, weight of the intestinal segments and digesta and pH in the digesta at slaughter for pigs fed the Western-style diet (WSD), the resistant starch diet (RSD) or the arabinoxylan diet (AXD) for 3 weeks (Least-squares mean values with their standard errors, n 10 per group)

CHO, carbohydrate; Cae, caecum; Co1, proximal one-third of the colon; Co2, mid one-third of the colon; Co3, distal one-third of the colon.

a,b,cMean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P <0·05).

Nutrient apparent digestibility, disappearance and transit time

Table 4 shows the apparent digestibility (termed digestibility) of DM, nutrients and selected NSP components and the arabinose:xylose ratio in large-intestinal segments. DM was digested to a higher (P< 0·001) degree in all intestinal segments of WSD-fed pigs than in those of RSD- and AXD-fed pigs, with the feeding of the AXD resulting in the lowest digestibility of DM in all segments. The digestibility of protein was 14–21 % lower (P< 0·001) in AXD-fed pigs throughout the large intestine than in WSD-fed pigs, whereas the RSD-fed pigs showed intermediate protein digestibility. Consequently, 20 v. 6 % of ingested protein was still undigested in the distal colon of AXD- and WSD-fed pigs, respectively. Fat was digested less efficiently (P< 0·001) in all gut segments of AXD-fed pigs than in those of WSD- and RSD-fed pigs, while no differences were observed between the WSD and RSD in any of the segments. The digestibility of starch was not affected by the diet. Only 8 % of NSP was digested in the caecum of RSD-fed pigs, whereas it was 47 % in that of AXD-fed pigs, with intermediate digestibility being observed in WSD-fed pigs. Also, in the three colon segments, the digestibility of NSP was 19–32 % lower (P< 0·001) in RSD-fed pigs than in WSD- and AXD-fed pigs, with the latter two showing comparable NSP digestibilities. RS was only detected in the digesta from RSD-fed pigs. RS was mainly digested in the caecum and only 3 % of RS was still undigested in the distal colon (Table 4). The content of total RS (RSenz), expressed as the percentage of digesta DM, in large-intestinal segments of pigs fed the RSD and the proportion of RSenz constituted by RSDMSO are shown in Fig. 1 . In the caecal digesta, RSDMSO constituted approximately 65 % of RSenz. In the colon segments, RSDMSO constituted 70–100 % of RSenz. For comparison, RSDMSO constituted 56 % of the RSenz in the RSD. In general, AX was digested at a slower rate than RS irrespective of the dietary treatments. There was no difference in the digestibility of AX between the WSD and AXD in any of the gut segments, whereas the digestibility of AX in RSD-fed pigs was somewhat lower (P< 0·001) throughout the large intestine. The arabinose:xylose ratio was 0·6 to 0·75 higher (P< 0·001) in all the gut segments of AXD-fed pigs than in those of RSD- and WSD-fed pigs. Low concentrations of AXOS could be detected in the Si3 digesta of AXD-fed pigs, but not in those of WSD- and RSD-fed pigs. AXOS was only present at trace levels in the caecal digesta of AXD-, WSD- and RSD-fed pigs (data not shown).

Table 4 Digestibility of DM, nutrients and NSP components and the ratio of arabinose:xylose in the different segments of the large intestine of pigs fed the Western-style diet (WSD), the resistant starch diet (RSD) or the arabinoxylan diet (AXD) for 3 weeks (Least-squares mean values with their standard errors, n 10 per treatment)

Cae, caecum; Co1, proximal one-third of the colon; Co2, mid one-third of the colon; Co3, distal one-third of the colon; RSenz, total content of resistant starch.

a,b,cMean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different between the diets (P <0·05).

Fig. 1 Total content of resistant starch (RSenz, ) and proportion of RSenz comprising RSdimethylsulphoxide (RSDMSO, ) in percentage of digesta DM sampled from the caecum (Cae), proximal one-third of the colon (Co1), mid one-third of the colon (Co2) and distal one-third of the colon (Co3) of RS diet-fed pigs (n 10). Mean values are shown.

The daily disappearance of selected dietary constituents and the N pool size in the caecum and colon are shown in Table 5. Diet did not affect the disappearance of fat and protein in the caecum and colon (P= 0·67 and P= 0·21, respectively); however, fat and protein disappeared to a significantly greater extent from the caecum than from the colon. The disappearance of total NSP was four to ten times higher (P< 0·001) in the caecum of AXD-fed pigs than in that of WSD- and RSD-fed pigs; however, there was no diet-induced differences in total NSP disappearance in the colon. There was a comparable amount of the disappearance of total NSP+total RS in the caecum and colon of AXD- and RSD-fed pigs (159 v. 147 g/d, respectively). The disappearance of RSenz was more than twice as high (P= 0·006) in the caecum as that in the colon of RSD-fed pigs. A similar amount of AX disappeared in the caecum and colon of WSD- and RSD-fed pigs. Given the three to four times higher content of AX in the AXD than that in the other diets, the disappearance of AX in both the caecum and colon was significantly higher in AXD-fed pigs and almost three times higher in the caecum. The daily N pool size was significantly higher in both the caecum and colon of AXD-fed pigs, intermediate in RSD-fed pigs and lowest in WSD-fed pigs. The feeding of the RSD and AXD resulted in a comparable but significantly lower MTT in the caecum and proximal part of the colon than the WSD (Table 6). In the Co2 and Co3, the MTT was highest in WSD-fed pigs, intermediate in RSD-fed pigs and lowest in AXD-fed pigs. The MTT from the Si3 to Co3 was less than half (P< 0·001) in AXD-fed pigs compared with WSD-fed pigs, with the MTT being intermediate in RSD-fed pigs.

Table 5 Amounts* of the disappearance of the selected nutrients from the caecum and colon and nitrogen pool size in the caecum and colon of pigs fed the Western-style diet (WSD), the resistant starch diet (RSD) or the arabinoxylan diet (AXD) for 3 weeks (Least-squares mean values with their standard errors, n 10 per treatment)

tNSP, total NSP; RSenz, total content of resistant starch; AX, arabinoxylan.

a,b,cMean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different between the diets (P <0·05).

* Calculated using the average feed intake the day before slaughter and the apparent digestibility of fat, protein, tNSP, RSenz, RSDMSO and AX.

Table 6 Mean transit time (h) in the intestinal segments of pigs fed either the Western-style diet (WSD), the resistant starch diet (RSD) or the arabinoxylan diet (AXD) (Least-squares mean values with their standard errors, n 10 per treatment)

Cae, caecum; Co1, proximal one-third of the colon; Co2, mid one-third of the colon; Co3, distal one-third of the colon; Si3, distal one-third of the small intestine.

a,b,cMean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different between the diets (P <0·05).

Concentration and pool size of SCFA in the digesta

There was no diet-induced difference in the total SCFA concentration of the digesta except in the Co3 where a significantly higher concentration was observed in RSD-fed pigs (107 mmol/kg wet digesta) than in WSD- or AXD-fed pigs (89 and 91 mmol/kg wet digesta, respectively). No differences between the diets were observed for acetate and propionate concentrations in any of the gut segments. Butyrate concentration was higher (P< 0·01) in the caecum (11 mmol/kg wet digesta) and Co1 (16 mmol/kg wet digesta) of AXD-fed pigs than in the caecum (5 mmol/kg wet digesta) and Co1 (9 mmol/kg wet digesta) of WSD-fed pigs, with the concentration being intermediate in those of RSD-fed pigs and not significantly different from the other two groups. No differences in butyrate concentration were observed in the Co2 and Co3. The feeding of the WSD resulted in the significantly highest (2·4 mmol/kg wet digesta) and AXD in the significantly lowest concentration (1·3 mmol/kg wet digesta) of branched-chain fatty acids (BCFA, sum of isobutyrate and isovalerate) in the caecum, whereas there were no diet-induced differences in the other intestinal segments.

Fig. 2 shows the pool size (mmol/d) of total and individual SCFA in various segments of the intestinal tract. The AXD increased (P< 0·05) the pool size of total SCFA by 100 % or more compared with the WSD in all intestinal segments (Fig. 2(A)), with the RSD also increasing the pool size significantly, except in the Si3 and not to the same extent as the AXD in the caecum. A similar trend was observed for the pool size of acetate and propionate, with AXD feeding resulting in a significantly larger pool size than the WSD, except for propionate in the Co3, where an intermediate pool size was observed following the RSD. In the caecum, Co1 and Co2, AXD feeding resulted in a 3- to 5-fold larger (P< 0·001) pool size of butyrate compared with the WSD. In the caecum and Co1, the RSD also increased the butyrate pool significantly (2- to 2·8-fold) compared with the WSD. In the Co3, there was a non-significant increase in butyrate pool size by the AXD compared with the WSD. The pool size of BCFA was 70–100 % higher (P< 0·05) following the AXD in the caecum, Co1 and Co3 compared with the WSD, with an intermediate pool size being observed following the RSD without any difference from the other diets. In the entire large intestine, the AXD most efficiently increased the pool size of total SCFA, propionate and butyrate followed by the RSD and WSD (Table 7).

Fig. 2 Pool size of (A) total SCFA, (B) acetate, (C) propionate, (D) butyrate and (E) branched-chain fatty acids in the distal one-third of the small intestine (Si3), the caecum (Cae) and the proximal, mid and distal one-third of the colon (Co1, Co2 and Co3) of pigs fed one of the three different diets for 3 weeks. Values are least-squares means (n 10 per diet), with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. a,b,cMean values with unlike letters were significantly different within the intestinal segments (P< 0·05). There was a significant effect for diet ((A–E) P< 0·001) and the diet × segment interaction was significant ((A–D) P< 0·001 and (E) P= 0·006). , Western-style diet; , resistant starch diet; , arabinoxylan diet.

Table 7 Pool size (mmol/d) of total and individual SCFA (branched-chain fatty acids; BCFA) in the large intestine (caecum+proximal one-third of the colon+mid one-third of the colon+distal one-third of the colon) in pigs fed either the Western-style diet (WSD), the resistant starch diet (RSD) or the arabinoxylan diet (AXD) (Least-squares mean values with their standard errors)

a,b,cMean values within a row with unlike superscript letters were significantly different (P <0·05).

Microbial composition in the faeces and principal component analysis

Analyses of the microbial composition in the faeces sampled at week 3 of the experiment showed a significantly higher level of F. prausnitzii, R. intestinalis, B. coccoides–E. rectale, Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus spp. in AXD-fed pigs than that in the other two groups, although for Bifidobacterium spp., the RSD was not significantly different from either the AXD or the WSD (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3 Microbial composition in the faeces obtained at week 3 of the experimental period. Values are least-squares means (n 10 per diet), with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. a,bMean values with unlike letters were significantly different within the bacterial species/group (P< 0·05). , Western-style diet; , resistant starch diet; , arabinoxylan diet.

The results of PCA, which transforms a number of correlated variables into a small number of uncorrelated variables, on faecal microbial composition from week 3 of the experimental period and total and individual pool sizes of SCFA in intestinal segments are depicted in Fig. 4(A) and (B). The first and the second principal components were responsible for 63·5 % of the total variance, and there was a clear clustering between the three diets; high, intermediate and low intestinal SCFA production for the AXD, RSD and WSD, respectively. The individual variation was highest for RSD-fed pigs, and from the PCA, one RSD-fed pig, in particular, was identified as an outlier (Fig. 4(A)).

Fig. 4 Principal component (PC) analysis. (A) Score plot of faecal microbial composition and daily pool of total and individual SCFA in various segments of the intestines in pigs fed the Western-style diet (), the resistant starch diet () or the arabinoxylan diet () for 3 weeks. The circle marks the 95 % Hotelling T2 control chart, showing possible outliers. (B) Projection of the parameters in the plane defined by the two first PC (loading plot). Si3, distal one-third of the small intestine; ce, caecum; co1, proximal one-third of the colon; co2, mid one-third of the colon; co3, distal one-third of the colon; tscfa, total scfa; ace, acetate; pro, propionate; but, butyrate; bcfa, branched-chain fatty acids (all pool size); F. prausnitzii, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii; E. rectale, Eubacterium rectale; R. intestinalis, Roseburia intestinalis.

Discussion

In the present study, we investigated the effect of increased amounts of DF from a low level (7 %) in a high-fat refined-carbohydrate WSD to a high level (19 %), provided as either a RSD or AXD, on digestion processes, intestinal SCFA concentration and pool size and on faecal microbial composition. Of specific interest was the formation of butyrate due to its significant role in colonic health( Reference Leonel and Alvarez-Leite 4 ) and as a key player in the microbial–mammalian metabolic axis( Reference Russell, Hoyles and Flint 40 ), providing a possible link between diet, intestinal microbiota and obesity-related metabolic diseases( Reference Brahe, Astrup and Larsen 41 ). We provide evidence that AX from rye flakes and enzyme-treated wheat bran is more efficient than RS from raw potato starch and HAM-RS2 in stimulating the number of butyrate-producing bacteria and in increasing the pool size of butyrate in the caecum, proximal and mid colon and thereby butyrate production. Bach Knudsen & Lærke( Reference Bach Knudsen and Lærke 42 ) showed a positive linear relationship between digested AX and net butyrate absorption in conscious catheterised pigs fed cereal-based bread diets varying in DF composition. This makes it plausible that the effects that we reported on especially butyrate pool size in the digesta are primarily due to AX components in the AXD, rather than other DF constituents in rye flakes and wheat bran, although AX constitutes a smaller proportion of total DF in the AXD (40 %) than RS does in the RSD (61 %).

Dietary fibre characteristics and effects on digestion processes

The two high-DF diets provided equal amounts of DF, but with different chemical compositions and physical characteristics( Reference Izydorczyk and Biliaderis 18 , Reference Annison and Topping 43 ). The structure and degradability of AX depends on its origin( Reference Glitso, Gruppen and Schols 19 , Reference Glitso, Brunsgaard and Hojsgaard 44 , Reference Rose, Patterson and Hamaker 45 ), and AX in the AXD was more substituted than that in the WSD and RSD based on the arabinose:xylose ratio of the diets. We found that AX in the AXD was more readily fermented already in the caecum and continued to be fermented along the large intestine, resulting in an increased substitution of AX in the undigested residue as also found by Glitso et al. ( Reference Glitso, Gruppen and Schols 19 ). In contrast, the structure of AX in the WSD and RSD was equally and hardly changed throughout the large intestine, although it should be noted that the total amount of AX in the WSD and RSD was one-quarter or less the level of AX in the AXD. This confirms that there is not necessarily a linear relationship between the arabinose:xylose ratio and AX degradability, since this also depends on, for example, the number of double substitutions( Reference Bach Knudsen and Lærke 42 ).

RS is defined as any starch or starch-derived material that escapes digestion and absorption in the upper digestive tract, and it comes in many forms with varying physical and organoleptic properties( Reference Higgins and Brown 46 ). The high-amylose maize starch and raw potato starch in the RSD used in the present study belong to the RS2 type of RS; starch granules are inaccessible to amylases due to granule starch structure( Reference Annison and Topping 43 ). In line with other recent pig studies( Reference Haenen, Zhang and Souza da Silva 14 , Reference Jonathan, Haenen and Souza da Silva 47 ) where retrograded tapioca starch was applied as the RS source (RS3 type), we found that RS was mainly degraded in the caecum. The higher proportion of RSDMSO (65–100 % of RSenz) in large-intestinal digesta than in the RSD (56 % of RSenz) indicates that the proportion of RS analysed as RSDMSO was more slowly fermented than the remaining RS in RSenz. Further analysis of individual RS ingredients (HAM-RS2 and raw potato starch) in the RSD is required to more specifically identify the origin of the RSDMSO fraction of RSenz. Giuberti et al. ( Reference Giuberti, Gallo and Moschini 48 ) reported that granule characteristics of potato starch differed from those of HAM-RS2 in having a larger diameter, surface area and volume, so there are likely differences in in vivo fermentability between the two RS sources. In particular, one RSD-fed pig degraded RS to a very low extent in all intestinal segments, and data from this pig were often identified as outliers in the statistical analysis and thus excluded from the dataset. A large individual difference in the ability of the microbiota to ferment RS has also been observed in human RS intervention studies( Reference McOrist, Miller and Bird 49 ).

Protein sources used in the WSD and RSD were identical (wheat flour and whey protein), but the digestibility of protein was lower in all large-intestinal segments of RSD-fed pigs, probably because the fermentation of RS resulted in increased production of microbial biomass and increased secretion of endogenous proteins. In AXD-fed pigs that exhibited an even lower protein digestibility in all large-intestinal segments than in RSD-fed pigs, the same factors are believed to be responsible, with protein originating from rye flakes being more inaccessible for digestion because of structural incorporation into the cell-wall structure, as shown in previous pig studies( Reference Bach Knudsen, Serena and Kjaer 23 , Reference Le Gall, Serena and Jorgensen 50 ). The lower digestibility of protein but also of DM corresponded well with the higher passage rate in all intestinal segments of pigs fed the high-DF diets compared with the WSD, resulting in less time for nutrient degradation and absorption. It is noteworthy that although the transit time from the small intestine to the distal colon is 28 % lower in AXD-fed pigs than in RSD-fed pigs, allowing for less time for microbial fermentation of NSP components, the AXD still results in the largest SCFA pool size. It is well established that soluble DF, which is higher in the AXD than in the other two diets, reduces the digestibility of fat in the small intestine( Reference Johnson 51 ). We found that this effect is persistent throughout the large intestine, similar to what has been reported in another pig study using a rye-based high-DF diet rich in AX( Reference Bach Knudsen, Serena and Kjaer 23 ).

Microbial composition and SCFA pool size

Feeding with the AXD resulted in a higher level of not only the butyrate-producing bacteria F. prausnitzii, R. intestinalis and B. coccoidesE. rectale, but also Bifidobacterium spp. and Lactobacillus spp. in the faeces. Protein disappearance in the large intestine was similar across the diets and the N pool size was highest in the large intestine of AXD-fed pigs despite almost 25 % less protein in the AXD than in the other two diets. Together, these results indicate that the higher number of bacteria associated with carbohydrate fermentation did not occur because of less competition from protein fermentation. In contrast, the larger pool size of BCFA in the large intestine of AXD-fed pigs (Fig. 2) indicates that feeding with the AXD actually resulted in a higher level of protein fermentation, as more protein reach the large intestine. This is supported by the results reported by Ingerslev et al. ( Reference Ingerslev, Theil and Hedemann 25 ) showing that AXD-fed pigs have a significantly higher concentration of BCFA in portal blood, indicating higher BCFA absorption than that in WSD- and RSD-fed pigs. The PCA showed that R. intestinalis was the bacteria mostly responsible for the separation between the diets. In line with the present results, Neyrinck et al. ( Reference Neyrinck, Possemiers and Druart 52 ) showed that a high-fat diet with 10 % long-chain soluble wheat AX increased Roseburia spp. and Bifidobacterium spp. in the caecal digesta of diet-induced obese mice compared with a control diet without AX. RS may also modify the microbial composition in the large intestine. RS from retrograded tapioca starch stimulated F. prausnitzii in the colon content of pigs and had a negative effect on the abundance of R. intestinalis and Lactobacillus ( Reference Haenen, Zhang and Souza da Silva 14 ), whereas RS from high-amylose maize stimulated Bifidobacterium spp. in pigs( Reference Regmi, Metzler-Zebeli and Ganzle 53 ). Although we did not observe any changes in the microbial composition following the RSD, the degradation of NSP in the large intestine was substantially impaired in RSD-fed pigs, which indicates that the existing micro-organisms shifted towards fermenting RS instead of NSP. Since RS itself was primarily utilised in the caecum, it could positively affect colon health by delaying the degradation of other NSP components in the more distal parts of the large intestine.

The shift in the microbial composition of AXD-fed pigs was clearly reflected in the SCFA profile of the intestinal digesta. In general, the concentration of fermentation metabolites measured in the present study is comparable with those found in other studies with pigs fed RS- and AX-enriched diets( Reference Haenen, Zhang and Souza da Silva 14 , Reference Le Gall, Serena and Jorgensen 50 ). Because more than 95 % of the SCFA produced are rapidly absorbed from the intestinal lumen and metabolised by the host, SCFA production would be more precisely estimated if the luminal SCFA pool was coupled to the quantitative measurements of SCFA in portal blood( Reference Theil, Jorgensen and Serena 54 ). By using the same experimental diets as applied in the present study, Ingerslev et al. ( Reference Ingerslev, Theil and Hedemann 25 ) showed that the AXD most efficiently stimulated the absorption of total SCFA and butyrate in the portal blood of multi-catheterised pigs, followed by the RSD and then by the WSD. Based on their results, it seems reasonable that we use the pool of total and individual SCFA in intestinal segments to estimate the daily production of SCFA. In accordance with the results from other studies in pigs( Reference Bach Knudsen and Hansen 55 Reference Govers, Gannon and Dunshea 57 ), we found that the SCFA pool size was low in the distal small intestine, increased in the caecum, peaked in the proximal colon and then declined towards the distal colon. This profile is consistent with greater fermentation of non-digestible carbohydrates occurring in the proximal large intestine (through greater substrate availability) and a decline in the pool size due to the depletion of the substrate and the absorption of SCFA from the digesta to the portal blood.

AX most efficiently increased both butyrate concentration and pool size in the caecum, proximal and mid part of the colon compared with RS. A number of in vitro studies have compared the concentration of SCFA following inoculation of different types of DF with human faeces( Reference Yang, Martinez and Walter 58 , Reference Kaur, Rose and Rumpagaporn 59 ) or in in vitro human gut simulation models( Reference van den Abbeele, Venema and Van De Wiele 60 ). However, only one study has compared the effects of human faecal inoculation with high-amylose maize RS or maize bran AX for 12 h of incubation and found no difference in butyrate production between the two substrates( Reference Yang, Martinez and Walter 58 ). Typical for these in vitro models is that they do not account for the dynamics of SCFA absorption in the intestinal epithelium and that the microbial community has a very short adaptation time to the introduced substrates compared with the present study on pig microbiota conducted during an experimental period of 3 weeks, which makes SCFA concentrations difficult to compare.

Conclusion

In the present study, we report that DF provided as either RS type 2 from high-amylose maize and raw potato starch or AX from rye flakes and enzyme-treated wheat bran has a significant and different influence on digestion processes and on the digestibility of nutrients and NSP components in the large intestine compared with a Western-style control diet low in DF. An AX-rich diet is more efficient than a RS-rich diet in shifting the microbial composition towards butyrogenic species in the faeces and in increasing the pool size of total SCFA and butyrate concentrations in the caecum, proximal and mid colon and in the entire large intestine.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Winnie Østergaard, Lisbeth Märcher, Kasper Bøgild Poulsen, Henri Ahokoski and Thomas Rebsdorf for excellent technical assistance. The authors acknowledge Lantmännen Cerealia A/S for providing rye flakes, and KMC Amba for providing the raw potato starch. The authors also acknowledge Mads Brøgger Pedersen for assistance in the PCA. The study was financially supported by the Danish Strategic Research Council, project ‘Concepts for enhanced butyrate production to improve colonic health and insulin sensitivity’ (project no. 10-093526). The Danish Strategic Research Council had no role in the design and analysis of the study or in the preparation of this manuscript.

The authors’ contributions are as follows: K. E. B. K., H. N. L. and P. K. T. were responsible for project development; T. S. N., P. K. T. conducted the animal experiment; M. S. and S. F. carried out the microbial composition analysis; T. S. N. performed the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript; J. F. S. produced the enzymatically modified wheat bran. All authors contributed, commented and approved the final content of the manuscript.

There are no conflicts of interest.

References

1 Lipkin, M, Reddy, B, Newmark, H, et al. (1999) Dietary factors in human colorectal cancer. Annu Rev Nutr 19, 545586.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2 Spooren, CE, Pierik, MJ, Zeegers, MP, et al. (2013) Review Article: the association of diet with onset and relapse in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 38, 11721187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3 Wong, JM, de Souza, R, Kendall, CW, et al. (2006) Colonic health: fermentation and short chain fatty acids. J Clin Gastroenterol 40, 235243.Google Scholar
4 Leonel, AJ & Alvarez-Leite, JI (2012) Butyrate: implications for intestinal function. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 15, 474479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Perrin, P, Pierre, F, Patry, Y, et al. (2001) Only fibres promoting a stable butyrate producing colonic ecosystem decrease the rate of aberrant crypt foci in rats. Gut 48, 5361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6 Toden, S, Bird, AR, Topping, DL, et al. (2007) Dose-dependent reduction of dietary protein-induced colonocyte DNA damage by resistant starch in rats correlates more highly with caecal butyrate than with other short chain fatty acids. Cancer Biol Ther 6, 253258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7 Kovarik, JJ, Tillinger, W, Hofer, J, et al. (2011) Impaired anti-inflammatory efficacy of n-butyrate in patients with IBD. Eur J Clin Invest 41, 291298.Google Scholar
8 Hamer, HM, Jonkers, DM, Bast, A, et al. (2009) Butyrate modulates oxidative stress in the colonic mucosa of healthy humans. Clin Nutr 28, 8893.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9 Clarke, JM, Young, GP, Topping, DL, et al. (2012) Butyrate delivered by butyrylated starch increases distal colonic epithelial apoptosis in carcinogen-treated rats. Carcinogenesis 33, 197202.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10 Canani, RB, Di Costanzo, M & Leone, L (2012) The epigenetic effects of butyrate: potential therapeutic implications for clinical practice. Clin Epigenetics 4, 4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Fung, KY, Cosgrove, L, Lockett, T, et al. (2012) A review of the potential mechanisms for the lowering of colorectal oncogenesis by butyrate. Br J Nutr 108, 820831.Google Scholar
12 The European Commission (2008) EU and Codex Definitions of dietary fibre – text with comments by N.G. Asp and S. Bryngelsson. http://www.healthgrain.org/webfm_send/48 (accessed March 2014)..Google Scholar
13 Bird, AR, Conlon, MA, Christophersen, CT, et al. (2010) Resistant starch, large bowel fermentation and a broader perspective of prebiotics and probiotics. Benef Microbes 1, 423431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Haenen, D, Zhang, J, Souza da Silva, C, et al. (2013) A diet high in resistant starch modulates microbiota composition, SCFA concentrations, and gene expression in pig intestine. J Nutr 143, 274283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15 Hamer, HM, Jonkers, D, Venema, K, et al. (2008) Review Article: the role of butyrate on colonic function. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 27, 104119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16 Jackson-Thompson, J, Ahmed, F, German, RR, et al. (2006) Descriptive epidemiology of colorectal cancer in the United States, 1998–2001. Cancer 107, 11031111.Google Scholar
17 Kolida, S, Tuohy, K & Gibson, GR (2002) Prebiotic effects of inulin and oligofructose. Br J Nutr 87, Suppl. 2, S193S197.Google Scholar
18 Izydorczyk, MS & Biliaderis, CG (1995) Cereal arabinoxylans: advances in structure and physicochemical properties. Carbohydr Polym 28, 3348.Google Scholar
19 Glitso, LV, Gruppen, H, Schols, HA, et al. (1999) Degradation of rye arabinoxylans in the large intestine of pigs. J Sci Food Agric 79, 961969.Google Scholar
20 Nielsen, KL, Hartvigsen, ML, Hedemann, MS, et al. (2014) Similar metabolic responses in pigs and humans to breads with different contents and compositions of dietary fibers: a metabolomics study. Am J Clin Nutr 99, 941949.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21 Miller, ER & Ullrey, DE (1987) The pig as a model for human nutrition. Annu Rev Nutr 7, 361382.Google Scholar
22 Damen, B, Cloetens, L, Broekaert, WF, et al. (2012) Consumption of breads containing in situ-produced arabinoxylan oligosaccharides alters gastrointestinal effects in healthy volunteers. J Nutr 142, 470477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23 Bach Knudsen, KE, Serena, A, Kjaer, AK, et al. (2005) Rye bread enhances the production and plasma concentration of butyrate but not the plasma concentrations of glucose and insulin in pigs. J Nutr 135, 16961704.Google Scholar
24 Choct, M, Selby, EAD, Cadogan, DJ, et al. (2004) Effects of particle size, processing, and dry or liquid feeding on performance of piglets. Aust J Agric Res 55, 237245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25 Ingerslev, AK, Theil, PK, Hedemann, MS, et al. (2014) Resistant starch and arabinoxylan augment SCFA absorption, but affect postprandial glucose and insulin responses differently. Br J Nutr 111, 15641576.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26 AOAC (1990) Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 15th ed. Arlington, VA: AOAC International.Google Scholar
27 Hansen, B (1989) Determination of nitrogen as elementary N, and alternative to Kjeldahl. Acta Agric Scand 39, 113118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28 Stoldt, W (1952) Worslag zur verinheitlichung der fettbestimmung in lebensmitteln (Suggestion to standardise the determination of fat in foodstuffs). F Seif Anst 54, 206207.Google Scholar
29 Larsson, K & Bengtsson, S (1983) Bestämning av lätttilgängeliga kolhydrater i växtmaterial (Determination of readily available carbohydrates in plant material). In National Laboratory of Agricultural Chemistry Methods Report no. 22 , vol. 22, Uppsala: National Laboratory of Agricultural Chemistry.Google Scholar
30 Bach Knudsen, KE (1997) Carbohydrate and lignin contents of plant materials used in animal feeding. Anim Feed Sci Technol 67, 319338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31 Kasprzak, MM, Lærke, HN & Bach Knudsen, KE (2012) Effects of isolated and complex dietary fiber matrices in breads on carbohydrate digestibility and physiochemical properties of ileal effluent from pigs. J Agric Food Chem 60, 1246912476.Google Scholar
32 Englyst, HN & Cummings, JH (1984) Simplified method for the measurement of total non-starch polysaccharides by gas–liquid-chromatography of constitute sugars as alditol acetate. Analyst 109, 937942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33 Theander, O & Åman, P (1979) Studies on dietary-fibers. 1. Analysis and chemical characterization of water-soluble and water-insoluble dietary-fibers. Swe J Agric Res 9, 97106.Google Scholar
34 McCleary, BV & Glennie-Holmes, M (1985) Enzymatic quantification of (1 → 3)(1 → 4)-β-d-glucan in barley and malt. J Inst Brew 91, 285295.Google Scholar
35 Schürch, AF, Lloyd, LE & Crampton, EW (1950) The use of chromic oxide as an index for determining digestibility of a diet. J Nutr 41, 629636.Google Scholar
36 Jensen, MT, Cox, RP & Jensen, BB (1995) Microbial production of skatole in the hindgut of pigs given different diets and its relation to skatole deposition in the back fat. Anim Sci 61, 293304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37 Lahtinen, SJ, Forssten, S, Aakko, J, et al. (2012) Probiotic cheese containing Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 and Lactobacillus acidophilus NCFM(R) modifies subpopulations of fecal lactobacilli and Clostridium difficile in the elderly. Age (Dordr) 34, 133143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38 Rinttila, T, Kassinen, A, Malinen, E, et al. (2004) Development of an extensive set of 16S rDNA-targeted primers for quantification of pathogenic and indigenous bacteria in faecal samples by real-time PCR. J Appl Microbiol 97, 11661177.Google Scholar
39 Makivuokko, H, Nurmi, J, Nurminen, P, et al. (2005) In vitro effects on polydextrose by colonic bacteria and caco-2 cell cyclooxygenase gene expression. Nutr Cancer 52, 94104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40 Russell, WR, Hoyles, L, Flint, HJ, et al. (2013) Colonic bacterial metabolites and human health. Curr Opin Microbiol 16, 246254.Google Scholar
41 Brahe, LK, Astrup, A & Larsen, LH (2013) Is butyrate the link between diet, intestinal microbiota and obesity-related metabolic diseases? Obes Rev 14, 950959.Google Scholar
42 Bach Knudsen, KE & Lærke, HN (2010) Rye arabinoxylans: molecular structure, physiochemical properties and physiological effects in the gastrointestinal tract. Cereal Chem 87, 353362.Google Scholar
43 Annison, G & Topping, DL (1994) Nutritional role of resistant starch: chemical structure vs physiological function. Annu Rev Nutr 14, 297320.Google Scholar
44 Glitso, LV, Brunsgaard, G, Hojsgaard, S, et al. (1998) Intestinal degradation in pigs of rye dietary fibre with different structural characteristics. Br J Nutr 80, 457468.Google Scholar
45 Rose, DJ, Patterson, JA & Hamaker, BR (2010) Structural differences among alkali-soluble arabinoxylans from maize (Zea mays), rice (Oryza sativa), and wheat (Triticum aestivum) brans influence human fecal fermentation profiles. J Agric Food Chem 58, 493499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46 Higgins, JA & Brown, IL (2013) Resistant starch: a promising dietary agent for the prevention/treatment of inflammatory bowel disease and bowel cancer. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 29, 190194.Google Scholar
47 Jonathan, MC, Haenen, D, Souza da Silva, C, et al. (2013) Influence of a diet rich in resistant starch on the degradation of non-starch polysaccharides in the large intestine of pigs. Carbohydr Polym 93, 232239.Google Scholar
48 Giuberti, G, Gallo, A, Moschini, M, et al. (2013) In vitro production of short-chain fatty acids from resistant starch by pig faecal inoculum. Animal 7, 14461453.Google Scholar
49 McOrist, AL, Miller, RB, Bird, AR, et al. (2011) Fecal butyrate levels vary widely among individuals but are usually increased by a diet high in resistant starch. J Nutr 141, 883889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
50 Le Gall, M, Serena, A, Jorgensen, H, et al. (2009) The role of whole-wheat grain and wheat and rye ingredients on the digestion and fermentation processes in the gut – a model experiment with pigs. Br J Nutr 102, 15901600.Google Scholar
51 Johnson, IT (1992) The influence of dietary fibre on lipid digestion and absorption. In Dietary Fibre – A Component of Food. Nutritional Function in Health and Disease, pp. 167180. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
52 Neyrinck, AM, Possemiers, S, Druart, C, et al. (2011) Prebiotic effects of wheat arabinoxylan related to the increase in bifidobacteria, Roseburia and Bacteroides/Prevotella in diet-induced obese mice. PLoS ONE 6, e20944.Google Scholar
53 Regmi, PR, Metzler-Zebeli, BU, Ganzle, MG, et al. (2011) Starch with high amylose content and low in vitro digestibility increases intestinal nutrient flow and microbial fermentation and selectively promotes bifidobacteria in pigs. J Nutr 141, 12731280.Google Scholar
54 Theil, PK, Jorgensen, H, Serena, A, et al. (2011) Products deriving from microbial fermentation are linked to insulinaemic response in pigs fed breads prepared from whole-wheat grain and wheat and rye ingredients. Br J Nutr 105, 373383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55 Bach Knudsen, KE & Hansen, I (1991) Gastrointestinal implications in pigs of wheat and oat fractions. 1. Digestibility and bulking properties of polysaccharides and other major constituents. Br J Nutr 65, 217232.Google Scholar
56 Marsono, Y, Illman, RJ, Clarke, JM, et al. (1993) Plasma lipids and large bowel volatile fatty acids in pigs fed on white rice, brown rice and rice bran. Br J Nutr 70, 503513.Google Scholar
57 Govers, MJ, Gannon, NJ, Dunshea, FR, et al. (1999) Wheat bran affects the site of fermentation of resistant starch and luminal indexes related to colon cancer risk: a study in pigs. Gut 45, 840847.Google Scholar
58 Yang, J, Martinez, I, Walter, J, et al. (2013) In vitro characterization of the impact of selected dietary fibers on fecal microbiota composition and short chain fatty acid production. Anaerobe 23, 7481.Google Scholar
59 Kaur, A, Rose, DJ, Rumpagaporn, P, et al. (2011) In vitro batch fecal fermentation comparison of gas and short-chain fatty acid production using “slowly fermentable” dietary fibers. J Food Sci 76, H137H142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
60 van den Abbeele, P, Venema, K, Van De Wiele, T, et al. (2013) Different human gut models reveal the distinct fermentation patters of arabinoxylan versus inulin. J Agric Food Chem 61, 98199827.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1 Ingredients of the Western-style diet (WSD), the resistant starch diet (RSD) and the arabinoxylan diet (AXD)

Figure 1

Table 2 Chemical composition and particle size distribution of the Western-style diet (WSD), the resistant starch diet (RSD) and the arabinoxylan diet (AXD)

Figure 2

Table 3 Intake of nutrients and energy, weight gain, weight of the intestinal segments and digesta and pH in the digesta at slaughter for pigs fed the Western-style diet (WSD), the resistant starch diet (RSD) or the arabinoxylan diet (AXD) for 3 weeks (Least-squares mean values with their standard errors, n 10 per group)

Figure 3

Table 4 Digestibility of DM, nutrients and NSP components and the ratio of arabinose:xylose in the different segments of the large intestine of pigs fed the Western-style diet (WSD), the resistant starch diet (RSD) or the arabinoxylan diet (AXD) for 3 weeks (Least-squares mean values with their standard errors, n 10 per treatment)

Figure 4

Fig. 1 Total content of resistant starch (RSenz, ) and proportion of RSenz comprising RSdimethylsulphoxide (RSDMSO, ) in percentage of digesta DM sampled from the caecum (Cae), proximal one-third of the colon (Co1), mid one-third of the colon (Co2) and distal one-third of the colon (Co3) of RS diet-fed pigs (n 10). Mean values are shown.

Figure 5

Table 5 Amounts* of the disappearance of the selected nutrients from the caecum and colon and nitrogen pool size in the caecum and colon of pigs fed the Western-style diet (WSD), the resistant starch diet (RSD) or the arabinoxylan diet (AXD) for 3 weeks (Least-squares mean values with their standard errors, n 10 per treatment)

Figure 6

Table 6 Mean transit time (h) in the intestinal segments of pigs fed either the Western-style diet (WSD), the resistant starch diet (RSD) or the arabinoxylan diet (AXD) (Least-squares mean values with their standard errors, n 10 per treatment)

Figure 7

Fig. 2 Pool size of (A) total SCFA, (B) acetate, (C) propionate, (D) butyrate and (E) branched-chain fatty acids in the distal one-third of the small intestine (Si3), the caecum (Cae) and the proximal, mid and distal one-third of the colon (Co1, Co2 and Co3) of pigs fed one of the three different diets for 3 weeks. Values are least-squares means (n 10 per diet), with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. a,b,cMean values with unlike letters were significantly different within the intestinal segments (P< 0·05). There was a significant effect for diet ((A–E) P< 0·001) and the diet × segment interaction was significant ((A–D) P< 0·001 and (E) P= 0·006). , Western-style diet; , resistant starch diet; , arabinoxylan diet.

Figure 8

Table 7 Pool size (mmol/d) of total and individual SCFA (branched-chain fatty acids; BCFA) in the large intestine (caecum+proximal one-third of the colon+mid one-third of the colon+distal one-third of the colon) in pigs fed either the Western-style diet (WSD), the resistant starch diet (RSD) or the arabinoxylan diet (AXD) (Least-squares mean values with their standard errors)

Figure 9

Fig. 3 Microbial composition in the faeces obtained at week 3 of the experimental period. Values are least-squares means (n 10 per diet), with their standard errors represented by vertical bars. a,bMean values with unlike letters were significantly different within the bacterial species/group (P< 0·05). , Western-style diet; , resistant starch diet; , arabinoxylan diet.

Figure 10

Fig. 4 Principal component (PC) analysis. (A) Score plot of faecal microbial composition and daily pool of total and individual SCFA in various segments of the intestines in pigs fed the Western-style diet (), the resistant starch diet () or the arabinoxylan diet () for 3 weeks. The circle marks the 95 % Hotelling T2 control chart, showing possible outliers. (B) Projection of the parameters in the plane defined by the two first PC (loading plot). Si3, distal one-third of the small intestine; ce, caecum; co1, proximal one-third of the colon; co2, mid one-third of the colon; co3, distal one-third of the colon; tscfa, total scfa; ace, acetate; pro, propionate; but, butyrate; bcfa, branched-chain fatty acids (all pool size); F. prausnitzii, Faecalibacterium prausnitzii; E. rectale, Eubacterium rectale; R. intestinalis, Roseburia intestinalis.