Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:32:26.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of ammonia treatment of wheat straw with or without supplementation of potato protein on intake, digestion and kinetics of comminution, rumen degradation and passage in steers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

S. J. Oosting ,
P. J. M. Vlemmix  and
J. Van Bruchem
S. J. Oosting
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Husbandry, Section Tropical Animal Production, Agricultural University, P.O. Box 338, NL 6700 AH Wageningen, The Netherlands
P. J. M. Vlemmix
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Human Physiology, Agricultural University, Haarweg 10, NL 6709 PJ Wageningen, The Netherlands
J. Van Bruchem
Affiliation:
Department of Animal and Human Physiology, Agricultural University, Haarweg 10, NL 6709 PJ Wageningen, The Netherlands
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Untreated wheat straw (UWS) or ammoniated wheat straw without (AWS) or with (AWSP) a supplement of potato protein of a low rumen degradability was fed to three steers according to a 3 × 3 Latin square design. All rations were supplemented with sugar-beet pulp and minerals. Voluntary organic matter intake (OMI, g/kg0.75 per d) was 67.8, 76.0 and 80.1 for whole rations (51.1, 59.7 and 59.2 for straw) for UWS, AWS and AWSP respectively, which was significantly higher for AWS and AWSP than for UWS. Organic matter digestibility (OMD, g/kg) was 561, 596 and 625 for the respective rations UWS, AWS and AWSP, also significantly higher for AWS and AWSP than for UWS. The increased voluntary intake and digestion of ammoniated wheat-straw-based rations were associated with a significantly higher potentially degradable fraction (D) of neutral detergent fibre (NDF) in offered straw (556 and 661 g/kg for untreated and ammoniated wheat straw respectively) and in the rumen pool (469, 555 and 554 g/kg for UWS, AWS and AWSP respectively). Isolated small rumen particles (retained on sieves with a pore size < 1.25 and > 0.041 mm) had a significantly lower D of NDF (average 588 g/kg) than isolated large rumen particles (average 663 g/kg). Fractional rates of degradation of NDF did not differ significantly either between untreated and ammonia-treated wheat straw offered (2.9 and 2.6%/h respectively) or between rumen pools (1.8, 1.7 and 2.1 %/h for UWS, AWS and AWSP respectively). Rations based on ammoniated wheat straw had a significantly higher rumen NH3-N concentration than UWS. Although the rumen pool size of total contents differed significantly between treatments, those of dry and organic matter and of cell wall constituents were not significantly different. The proportion of rumen dry matter passing through a sieve with a pore size of 1.25 mm averaged 0.684 over rations (not significantly different between rations). Daily rumination (96 min) and eating (52 min) times/kg NDF ingested did not differ between rations. The rate of comminution of large particles estimated from the disappearance of indigestible NDF in large rumen particles from the rumen of animals without access to feed was 4.1, 6.3 and 7.1 %/h for UWS, AWS and AWSP respectively. These values were not significantly different. The fractional rate of passage estimated from the faecal excretion of Cr-NDF was 5.4, 6.1 and 6.3%/h for UWS, AWS and AWSP respectively (significantly higher for AWS and AWSP than for UWS) but the turnover rate of indigestible NDF did not differ between treatments.

Keywords

Ammonia treatmentWheat strawRate of passageRate of degradationRumen pool size
Type
Nutritional effects of treating straw with ammonia
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 72 , Issue 1 , July 1994 , pp. 147 - 165
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1994

References

REFERENCES

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Aitchisson, E., Gill, M., France, J. & Dhanoa, M. S. (1986). Comparison of methods to describe the kinetics of digestion and passage of fibre in sheep. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 37, 1065–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosch, M. W., Lammers-Wienhoven, S. C. W., Bangma, G. A., Boer, H. & van Adrichem, P. W. M. (1993 a). Influence of stage of maturity of grass silages on digestion processes in dairy cows. 2. Rumen contents, passage rates, distribution of rumen and faecal particles and mastication activity. Livestock Production Science 32, 265–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosch, M. W., Tamminga, S. & van Bruchem, J. (1992). Dietary and animal factors affecting rumen capacity in dairy cows. Archives of Animal Breeding 34, 469–481.Google Scholar
Bosch, M. W., Tamminga, S., Post, G., Leffering, C. P. & Muylaert, J. M. (1993 b). Influence of stage of maturity of grass silages on digestion processes in diary cows. 1. Comparison, nylon bag degradation rates, fermentation characteristics, digestibility and intake. Livestock Production Science 32, 245–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, B. O. (1989). DBSTAT User's Guide. Wageningen: Department of Animal Husbandry, Agricultural University.Google Scholar
Cheeson, A., Gordon, A. H. & Lomax, J. A. (1983). Substituent groups linked by alkali-labile bonds to arabinose and xylose residues of legume, grass and cereal straw cell walls and their fate during digestion by rumen micro-organisms. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 34, 1330–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottyn, B. G. & De Boever, J. L. (1988). Upgrading of straw by ammoniation. Animal Feed Science and Technology 21, 287–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dias-da-Silva, A. A. & Sundsterl, F. (1986). Urea as a source of ammonia for improving the nutritive value of wheat straw. Animal Feed Science and Technology 14, 67–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doyle, P. T. (1983). Digestion of treated crop residues and the need for nutrient additions in balanced rations using such residues. In The Utilisaiion of Fibrous Crop Residues, pp. 69–85 [Pearce, G. R., editor]. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar
Doyle, P. T. & Panday, S. B. (1990). The feeding value of cereal straws for sheep. 111. Supplementation with minerals or minerals and urea. Animal Feed Science and Technology 29, 29–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, A. R. (1977). Nutritional status and intake regulation in sheep. VII. Relationships between the voluntary intake of herbage by sheep and the protein/energy ratio in the digestion products. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 28, 907–915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goering, H. K. & van Soest, P. J. (1970). Forage Fiber Analysis. Agricultural Handbook no. 379. Washington DC: Agricultural Research Service, US Department of Agriculture.Google Scholar
Hespell, R. B. & Bryant, M. P. (1979) Efficiency of rumen microbial growth: influence of some theoretical and experimental factors on YATP. Journal of Animal Science 49, 1640–1659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaske, M., Hatiboglu, S. & Engelhardt, W. V. (1992). The influence of density and size of particles on rumination and passage from the reticulo-rumen of sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 67, 235–244.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kennedy, P. M. & Poppi, D. P. (1984). Critical particle size in sheep and cattle. In Techniques in Particle Size Analysis of Feed and Digesta in Ruminants, p. 170 [Kennedy, P. M., editor]. Edmonton: Canadian Society of Animal Science.Google Scholar
Ketelaars, J. J. M. H. & Tolkamp, B. J. (1992). Toward a new theory of feed intake regulation in ruminants. 1.Causes of differences in voluntary feed intake; critique of current views. Livestock Production Science 30, 269–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, V. C., Dhanoa, M. S., Hartley, R. D. & Keene, A. S. (1990). Relationships between chemical composition, digestibility in vitro and cell-wall degradability of wheat straw treated with different amounts of ammonia and water at elevated temperature. Animal Feed Science and Technology 27, 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrisson, I. M. (1983). The effect of physical and chemical treatments on the degradation of wheat and barley straws by rumen liquor-pepsin and pepsin-cellulase systems. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 34, 1323–1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oosting, S. J., Verdonk, J. M. H. J. & Spinhoven, G. G. B. (1989). Effect of supplementary urea, glucose and minerals on the in vitro degradation of low quality feeds. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science 2, 583–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olrskov, E. R., Kay, M. & Reid, G. W. (1989). Prediction of intake of straw and performance by cattle from chemical analysis, biological measurements and degradation characteristics. In: Evaluation of Straws in Ruminant Feeding, pp. 155–163 [Chenost, M. and Reiniger, P., editors]. Barking, Essex: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
Poppi, D. P., Norton, B. W., Minson, D. J. & Henricksen, R. E. (1980). The validity of the critical size theory for particles leaving the rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambridge) 94, 275–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, P. H., Fadel, J. G. & Tamminga, S. (1986). Evaluation of mathematical models to describe neutral detergent residue in terms of its susceptibility to degradation in the rumen. Animal Feed Science and Technology 15, 249–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheiner, D. (1976). Determination of ammonia and Kjeldahl nitrogen by indophenol method. Water Research 10, 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silva, A. T., Greenhalgh, J. F. D. & Orskov, E. R. (1989). Influence of ammonia treatment and supplementation on the intake, digestibility and weight gain of sheep and cattle on barley straw diets. Animal Production 48, 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutherland, T. M. (1987). Particles separation in the forestomachs of sheep. In Aspects ofDigestive Physiology in Ruminants, pp. 43–73 [Dobson, A. and Dobson, M. J., editors]. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Ternrud, I. E. (1987). Degradation of untreated and alkali-treated straw polysaccharides in ruminants. PhD Thesis, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.Google Scholar
Tolkamp, B. J. & Ketelaars, J. J. M. H. (1992). Towards a new theory of feed intake regulation in ruminants. 2.Costs and benefits of feed consumption: an optimization approach. Livestock Production Science 30, 297–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uden, P., Colluci, P. E. & van Soest, P. J. (1980). Investigation of chromium, cerium and cobalt as markers in digesta. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 31, 625–632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Soest, P. J. (1982). Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. Corvallis, Oregon: O & B Books.Google Scholar
Von Keyserlingk, M. A. G. & Mathison, G. W. (1989). Use of the in situ technique and passage rate constants in predicting voluntary intake and apparent digestibility of forages by steers. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 69, 973–987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldo, D. R., Smith, L. W., Cox, E. L., Weinland, B. T. & Lucas, H. L. Jr. (1971). Logarithmic normal distribution for description of sieved forage materials. Journal of Dietary Science 54, 1465–1469.Google Scholar
Welch, J. G. (1982). Rumination, particle size and passage from the rumen. Journal of Animal Science 54, 885–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weston, R. H. (1982). Animal factors affecting feed intake. In Nutritional Limits to Animal Production from Pastures, pp. 183–198. [Hacker, J. B., editor]. Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Zorrilla-Rios, J., Horn, G. W. & McNew, R. W. (1991). Nutritive value of ammoniated wheat straw fed to cattle. Journal of Animal Science 69, 283–294.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed