Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:55:58.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of fat supplementation on voluntary food intake and rumen metabolism in sheep

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2007

J. Kowalczyk
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
E. R. ørskov
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
J. J. Robinson
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
C. S. Stewart
Affiliation:
The Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn, Aberdeen AB2 9SB
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

1. In an experiment in which a high-fat supplement was given in the dry form to lambs offered dried grass ad lib., both the voluntary intake and digestibility of the dried grass were reduced. When the high-fat supplement was given in a liquid suspension so that the rumen was by-passed, the voluntary intake and digestibility of the dried grass were not significantly altered.

2. The effect of injecting an emulsion of tallow into the rumen of sheep on rumen metabolism was studied in another experiment. Increasing the fat supplementation lowered the rate of digestion of both dried grass and cotton thread, lowered markedly the concentration of rumen ammonia, and raised the proportion of propionic acid in the rumen.

Type
Papers on General Nutrition
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1977

References

REFERENCES

Atkinson, T., Fowler, V. R., Garton, G. A. & Lough, K. A. (1972). Analyst Lond. 97, 562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, P. C. (1972). The influence of the method of feeding of fat and lactose on digestibility and voluntary intake of dried grass in the young ruminant lamb. Thesis, University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
Bailey, P. C. & Ørskov, E. R. (1974). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 33, 45A.Google Scholar
Brooks, C. C., Garner, G. B., Gehrke, C. W., Muhrer, M. E. & Pfander, W. H. (1954). J. Anim. Sci. 13, 758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bull, L. S. (1971). Proc. Univ. Md Nutr. Conf. Feed Mfrs 20.Google Scholar
Czerkawski, J. W. (1973). J. aqric. Sci., Camb. 81, 517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, J., Mathieson, J. & Boyne, A. W. (1970). Analyst Lond. 95, 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliwell, G. (1957). J. gen. Microbiol. 17, 153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, C. (1973). J. agric. Sci. Camb. 81, 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Itaya, K. & Ui, M. (1965). J. Lipid Res. 6, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehrez, A. Z. & Ørskov, E. R. (1976). Proc. Nutr. Soc. 35, 41A.Google Scholar
Mercer, J. C. & Annison, E. F. (1976). In Protein Metabolism and Nutrition, EAAP no. 16. [Cole, C. D. A. editor]. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R. & Benzie, D. (1969). Br. J. Nutr. 23, 415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shaw, J. C. & Ensor, W. L. (1959). J. Dairy Sci. 42, 1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storry, J. E., Brumby, P. E., Hall, A. J. & Johnson, V. W. (1974). J. Dairy Res. 57, 61.Google Scholar
Updegraff, D. M. (1969). Analyt. Biochem. 32, 420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. (1963). J. Ass. off. agric. Chem. 46, 829.Google Scholar
Whitehead, R., Cooke, G. H. & Chapman, B. T. (1967). Technical Symposium 2, 337. Technicon Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Whitelaw, F. G., Hyldgaard-Jensen, J., Reid, R. S. & Kay, M. G. (1970). Br. J. Nutr. 24, 179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar