Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:09:17.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effect of fishmeal supplementation of a straw-based diet on growth and calorimetric efficiency of growth in heifers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2007

Isabelle Ortigues ,
T. Smith ,
M. Gill ,
S. B. Cammell  and
N. W. Yarrow
Isabelle Ortigues
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Shinfield, Reading, Berkshire RG2 9AQ
T. Smith
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Shinfield, Reading, Berkshire RG2 9AQ
M. Gill
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
S. B. Cammell
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Hurley, Maidenhead, Berkshire SL6 5LR
N. W. Yarrow
Affiliation:
AFRC Institute for Grassland and Animal Production, Shinfield, Reading, Berkshire RG2 9AQ
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Thirty-two 160 kg dairy heifers were used to measure the effects of increasing dietary protein content on growth and heat production. A basal diet containing (g/kg) 550 sodium hydroxide-treated straw, 220 barley, 220 sugarbeet pulp and 10 urea was offered with 0, 76 and 152 g fishmeal/kg dry matter of the basal diet (F0, F1 and F2 levels respectively). The three diets were each given at two levels of feeding (low, L; high, H): 57.6 g/d per kg metabolic body-weight (W0.75) for the LF0 diet and 74.7 g/d per kg W0.75 for the HFO diet. Apparent digestibility of the diets increased in response to the addition of fishmeal. Mean dry matter digestibility values were 0.67, 0.67, 0.69, 0.66, 0.68 and 0.69 and those for acid-detergent fibre digestibility were 0.60, 0.63, 0.66, 0.58, 0.60 and 0.65 for diets LF0, LF1, LF2, HF0, HF1 and HF2 respectively. Nitrogen retention increased in response to both fishmeal and feeding level. Live-weight gains were 170, 296, 434 g/d for the LF0, LF1 and LF2 diets and 468, 651 and 710 g/d for the HF0, HF1 and HF2 diets respectively. There were significant effects of increasing the plane of feeding and the level of fishmeal in the diet on live-weight gain. Dietary effects on live-weight gains were accompanied by increases in mean energy retention of 23, 45, 82, 94, 160 and 152 kJ/d per kg W0.75 for diets LF0, LF1, LF2, HF0, HF1 and HF2 respectively, but no definite evidence was obtained that dietary supplementation with fishmeal modified the efficiency of utilization of metabolizable energy for growth.

Keywords

FishmealStrawEnergy utilizationGrowthHeifer
Type
Energy and Protein Metabolism
Information
British Journal of Nutrition , Volume 64 , Issue 3 , November 1990 , pp. 639 - 651
Copyright
Copyright © The Nutrition Society 1990

References

Agricultural Research Council (1980). The Nutrient Requirements of Ruminant Livestock. Farnham Royal, Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Agricultural Research Council (1984). Report of the Protein Group of the Agricultural Research Council Working Party on the Nutrient Requirements of Ruminants. Farnham Royal, Slough: Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux.Google Scholar
Anderson, P. T., Bergen, W. G., Merkel, R. A. & Hawkins, D. R. (1988). The effects of dietary crude protein level on rate, efficiency and composition of gain of growing beef bulls. Journal of Animal Science 66, 1990–1996.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Balch, C. C. (1967). Problems in predicting the value of non-protein nitrogen as a substitute for protein in rations for farm animals. World Review of Animal Production 3, 84–91.Google Scholar
Barry, T. N. (1981). Protein and metabolism in growing lambs fed on fresh ryegrass (Lolium perenne)-clover (Trifolium repens) pasture ad lib. 1. Protein and energy deposition in response to abomasum infusion of casein and methionine. British Journal of Nutrition 46, 521–532.Google ScholarPubMed
Black, J. L., Gill, M., Thornley, J. H. M., Beever, D. E. & Oldham, J. D. (1987). Simulation of the metabolism of absorbed energy yielding nutrients in young sheep; the efficiency of utilization of lipid and amino acid. Journal of Nutrition 117, 116–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaxter, K. L. & Boyne, A. W. (1978). The estimation of the nutritive value of feeds as energy sources for ruminants and the derivation of feeding systems. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 90, 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brouwer, E. (1965). Report of sub-committee on constants and factors. In Energy Metabolism, European Association of Animal Production Publication no. 11 pp. 441–443 [Blaxter, K. L., editor]. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Cammell, S. B., Beever, D. E., Skelton, K. V. & Spooner, M. C. (1981). The construction of open-circuit calorimeters for measuring gaseous exchange and heat production in sheep and young cattle. Laboratory Practice 30, 115–119.Google Scholar
Cammell, S. B., Thomson, D. J., Beever, D. E., Haines, M. J., Dhanoa, M. S. & Spooner, M. C. (1986). The efficiency of energy utilization in growing cattle consuming fresh perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne cv. Melle) or white clover (Trifolium repens cv. Blanca). British Journal of Nutrition 55, 669–680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cochran, W. G. & Cox, G. M. (1957). Experimental Designs. New York: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Cottritl, B. R., Beever, D. E., Austin, A. R. & Osbourn, D. F. (1982). The effect of protein and non-protein nitrogen supplements to maize silage on total amino acid supply in young cattle. British Journal of Nutrition 48, 527–541.Google Scholar
Geay, Y. & Robelin, J. (1979). Variation of meat production capacity in cattle due to genotype and level of feeding: genotype-nutrition interaction. Livestock Production Science 6, 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gill, M. & Beever, D. E. (1982). The effect of protein supplementation on digestion and glucose metabolism in young cattle fed on silage. British Journal of Nutrition 48, 37–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gill, M., Thornley, J. H. M., Black, J. L., Oldham, J. D. & Beever, D. E. (1984). Simulation of the metabolism of absorbed energy-yielding nutrients in young sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 52, 621–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartsook, E. W. & Hershberger, T. V. (1971). Interactions of major nutrients in whole animal energy metabolism. Federation Proceedings 30, 1466–1473.Google ScholarPubMed
MacRae, J. C. & Lobley, G. E. (1986). Interactions between energy and protein. In Control of Digestion and Metabolism in Ruminants, pp. 367–385 [Milligan, L., Grovum, W. L. and Dobson, A., editors]. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
MacRae, J. C., Smith, J. S., Dewey, P. J. S., Brewer, A. C., Brown, D. S. & Walker, A. (1985). The efficiency of utilization of metabolizable energy and apparent absorption of amino acids in sheep given spring-and autumn-harvested dried grass. British Journal of Nutrition 54, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oldham, J. D. & Smith, T. (1981). Protein-energy interrelationships for growing and for lactating cattle. In Protein Contribution of Feedstuffs for Ruminants: Application to Feed Formulation, pp. 103–130 [Miller, E. L., Pike, I. H. and Van Es, A. J. H., editors]. London: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Ortigues, I. (1987). Nutrient supply, growth and calorimetric efficiency in heifers offered straw rich diets. PhD Thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Ortigues, I., Smith, T., Oldham, J. D. & Gill, M. (1988). The effects of fishmeal on growth and calorimetric efficiency in heifers offered straw-based diets. In Energy Metabolism, pp. 65–68 [Van der Honing, Y. and Close, W. H., editors]. Wageningen: Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation.Google Scholar
Ørskov, E. R., McDonald, I., Grubb, D. A. & Pennie, K. (1976). The nutrition of the early weaned lamb. IV. Effects on growth rate, food utilization and body composition of changing from a low to a high protein diet. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 86, 411–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribeiro, J. M. C. R., MacRae, J. C. & Webster, A. J. F. (1981). An attempt to explain differences in the nutritive value of spring- and autumn-harvested dried grass. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 40, 12A.Google Scholar
Robb, J., Evans, P. J. & Fisher, C. (1980). A study of the nutritional energetics of sodium hydroxide treated straw pellets in rations fed to growing lambs. In Energy Metabolism, pp. 63–67 [Mount, L. E., editor]. London: Butterworths.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooke, J. A. & Armstrong, D. G. (1987). The digestion by cattle of silage and barley diets containing increasing quantities of fishmeal. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 109, 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T. (1978). The utilization of poor quality roughages by yearling dairy heifers. PhD Thesis, University of Reading.Google Scholar
Smith, T. (1979). The collection of faeces and urine from steers. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 30, 215–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T., Broster, V. J. & Hill, R. E. (1980 a). A comparison of sources of supplementary nitrogen for young cattle receiving fibre rich diets. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 687–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, T., Broster, W. H. & Siviter, J. W. (1980 b). An assessment of barley straw and oat hulls as energy sources for yearling cattle. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 95, 677–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steen, R. W. J. (1985). Protein supplementation of silage-based diets for calves. Animal Production 41, 292–300.Google Scholar
Sutton, J. D. & Johnson, V. W. (1969). Fermentation in the rumen of cows given rations containing hay and flaked maize or rolled barley in widely different proportions. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 73, 459–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terry, R. A. & Outen, G. E. (1973). The determination of cell-wall constituents in barley and maize. Chemistry and Industry 23, 1116–1117.Google Scholar
Thomson, D. J., Haines, M. J., Austin, A. R., Cammell, S. B., Beever, D. E., Dhanoa, M. S. & Barnes, R. L. (1983). The voluntary intake, gain, tissue retention and efficiency of energy and protein utilization by Friesian steers of fresh perennial ryegrass and white clover. Animal Production 36, 501.Google Scholar
Van Soest, P. J. (1963). Use of detergents in the analysis of fibrous feeds. II. A rapid method for the determination of fibre and lignin. Journal of the Association of Official Agricultural Chemists 46, 829–835.Google Scholar
Vermorel, M. & Bickel, H. (1980). Utilization of feed energy by growing ruminant animals. Annales de Zootechnie 29, (n° hors sérié) 127–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wainman, F. W., Smith, J. S. & Dewey, P. J. S. (1975). The nutritive value for sheep of ruminant diet AA6, a complete cob diet containing 30% barley straw. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 84, 109–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, D. M. & Norton, B. W. (1971). The utilization of the metabolizable energy of diets of different protein content by the milk-fed lamb. Journal of Agricultural Science, Cambridge 77, 363–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitelaw, F. G., Milne, J. S., Ørskov, E. R. & Smith, J. S. (1986). The nitrogen and energy metabolism of lactating cows given abomasal infusions of casein. British Journal of Nutrition 55, 537–556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed